• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

讲英语和西班牙语的弱势老年群体报告了许多进行预先护理计划的障碍。

English and Spanish-speaking vulnerable older adults report many barriers to advance care planning.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Aug;69(8):2110-2121. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17230. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.17230
PMID:34061370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8373705/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Advance care planning (ACP) rates are low in diverse, vulnerable older adults, yet little is known about the unique barriers they face and how these barriers impact ACP documentation rates.

DESIGN

Validated questionnaires listing patient, family/friend, and clinician/system-level ACP barriers and an open-ended question on ACP barriers.

SETTING

Two San Francisco public/Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand two hundred and forty-one English and Spanish-speaking patients, aged 55 and older, with two or more chronic conditions.

MEASUREMENTS

The open-ended question on ACP barriers was analyzed using content analysis. We conducted chart review for prior ACP documentation. We used chi-square/Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and logistic regression to assess associations between ACP barriers and demographic characteristics/ACP documentation.

RESULTS

Participant mean age was 65 ± 7.4 years; they were 74% from racial/ethnic minority groups, 36% Spanish-speaking, and 36% with limited health literacy. A total of 26 barriers were identified (15 patient, 4 family/friend, 7 clinician/system-level), and 91% reported at least one ACP barrier (mean: 5.6 ± 4.0). The most common barriers were: (patient-level) discomfort thinking about ACP (60%), wanting to leave health decisions to "God" (44%); (family/friend-level) not wanting to burden friends/family (33%), assuming friends/family already knew their preferences (31%); (clinician/system-level) assuming doctors already knew their preferences (41%), and mistrust (37%). Compared with those with no barriers, participants with at least one reported barrier were more likely to be from a racial/ethnic minority group (76% vs 53%), Spanish-speaking (39% vs 6%), with fair-to-poor health (48% vs 34%), and limited health literacy (39% vs 9%) (p < 0.001 for all). Participants who reported barriers were less likely to have ACP documentation (adjusted odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [0.42, 0.98]).

CONCLUSION

English- and Spanish-speaking older adults reported 26 unique barriers to ACP, with higher barriers among vulnerable populations, and barriers were associated with lower ACP documentation. Barriers must be considered when developing customized ACP interventions for diverse older adults.

摘要

背景/目的:在多样化、弱势的老年人群体中,预先医疗指示(ACP)的普及率较低,但人们对他们所面临的独特障碍知之甚少,也不清楚这些障碍如何影响 ACP 文件记录率。

设计

使用列出患者、家属/朋友和临床医生/系统层面 ACP 障碍的有效问卷和一个关于 ACP 障碍的开放式问题。

地点

旧金山两家公立/退伍军人事务部医院。

参与者

1241 名年龄在 55 岁及以上、患有两种或两种以上慢性疾病的讲英语和西班牙语的患者。

测量方法

使用内容分析法分析 ACP 障碍的开放式问题。我们对之前的 ACP 文件记录进行了图表审查。我们使用卡方检验/Wilcoxon 秩和检验和逻辑回归来评估 ACP 障碍与人口统计学特征/ACP 文件记录之间的关联。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为 65±7.4 岁;他们中 74%来自少数族裔群体,36%讲西班牙语,36%有有限的健康素养。共确定了 26 个障碍(15 个患者、4 个家庭/朋友、7 个临床医生/系统层面),91%的人报告了至少一个 ACP 障碍(平均 5.6±4.0)。最常见的障碍是:(患者层面)不愿意考虑 ACP(60%),希望将健康决策留给“上帝”(44%);(家属/朋友层面)不想给朋友/家人带来负担(33%),假设朋友/家人已经知道他们的偏好(31%);(临床医生/系统层面)假设医生已经知道他们的偏好(41%)和不信任(37%)。与没有障碍的参与者相比,报告至少有一个障碍的参与者更有可能来自少数族裔群体(76% vs. 53%),讲西班牙语(39% vs. 6%),健康状况一般或较差(48% vs. 34%),健康素养有限(39% vs. 9%)(p<0.001)。报告障碍的参与者更不可能有 ACP 文件记录(调整后的优势比=0.64,95%置信区间[0.42, 0.98])。

结论

讲英语和西班牙语的老年患者报告了 26 种独特的 ACP 障碍,弱势群体的障碍更高,障碍与较低的 ACP 文件记录率有关。在为多样化的老年患者制定定制的 ACP 干预措施时,必须考虑到这些障碍。

相似文献

1
English and Spanish-speaking vulnerable older adults report many barriers to advance care planning.讲英语和西班牙语的弱势老年群体报告了许多进行预先护理计划的障碍。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Aug;69(8):2110-2121. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17230. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
2
Empowering Older Adults to Discuss Advance Care Planning During Clinical Visits: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.赋权老年人在临床就诊期间讨论预立医疗照护计划:PREPARE 随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16405. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
3
Improving advance care planning for English-speaking and Spanish-speaking older adults: study protocol for the PREPARE randomised controlled trial.改善英语和西班牙语老年人群的预立医疗照护计划:PREPARE随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 11;6(7):e011705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011705.
4
Health Literacy Matters More Than Experience for Advance Care Planning Knowledge Among Older Adults.健康素养对老年人的预先医疗照护规划知识比经验更重要。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2151-2156. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16129. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
5
The PREPARE for Your Care program increases advance care planning engagement among diverse older adults with cancer.PREPARE 关爱计划提高了不同癌症老年患者的预先护理计划参与度。
Cancer. 2021 Oct 1;127(19):3631-3639. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33676. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
Engaging Diverse English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults in Advance Care Planning: The PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.参与式准备计划研究:一项针对不同英语和西班牙语老年人群体的随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1616-1625. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4657.
7
Quality and Satisfaction With Advance Care Planning Conversations Among English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults.英语和西班牙语老年患者的预先医疗照护计划谈话的质量和满意度。
J Palliat Med. 2023 Oct;26(10):1380-1385. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0565. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
8
A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients' self-identified barriers.改善预立医疗照护计划流程的临床框架:从患者自我认定的障碍入手。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Jan;57(1):31-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02093.x.
9
Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PREPARE网站与易读的预立医疗指示对退伍军人预立医疗照护计划文件记录及参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1607.
10
Engagement in multiple steps of the advance care planning process: a descriptive study of diverse older adults.参与预先护理计划过程的多个步骤:对不同老年人的描述性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jun;56(6):1006-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01701.x. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitated Versus Patient-Directed Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.晚期癌症患者中促进式与患者主导的预先护理计划:一项随机临床试验
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Mar 19:OP2500046. doi: 10.1200/OP-25-00046.
2
Achieving goal-concordant care: Formal and informal advance care planning for White, Black, and Hispanic older adults.实现目标一致的护理:针对白人、黑人及西班牙裔老年人的正式和非正式的预先护理计划。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Aug;72(8):2412-2422. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18971. Epub 2024 May 18.
3
Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.全科医疗中的复杂预立医疗计划干预措施(ACP-GP):一项整群随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jan 25;74(739):e78-e87. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0022. Print 2024 Feb.
4
Quality and Satisfaction With Advance Care Planning Conversations Among English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults.英语和西班牙语老年患者的预先医疗照护计划谈话的质量和满意度。
J Palliat Med. 2023 Oct;26(10):1380-1385. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0565. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
5
Knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions of elderly individuals regarding advance care planning: Questionnaire development and testing.老年人对预先医疗指示的知识、态度和行为意向:问卷的制定和测试。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0272351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272351. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review.剖析预先医疗照护计划结果的复杂性:我们了解什么,又该往何处去? 范围性回顾。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jan;69(1):234-244. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16801. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
2
Introducing Goals of Patient Care in Residential Aged Care Facilities to Decrease Hospitalization: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.引入住院老年护理机构患者护理目标以减少住院率:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Oct;20(10):1318-1324.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
3
Cluster-randomised trial of a nurse-led advance care planning session in patients with COPD and their loved ones.COPD 患者及其家属的护士主导的预立医疗照护计划会议的群组随机试验。
Thorax. 2019 Apr;74(4):328-336. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211943. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
4
Advance care planning after hospital discharge: qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers from patient interviews.出院后预先医疗照护计划:对患者访谈中促进因素和障碍因素的定性分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Dec 5;17(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0379-0.
5
Healthcare Providers' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practice Behaviors for Educating Patients About Advance Directives: A National Survey.医疗服务提供者在就预先医疗指示对患者进行教育方面的态度、知识和实践行为:一项全国性调查。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 May;36(5):387-395. doi: 10.1177/1049909118813720. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
Engaging Diverse English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults in Advance Care Planning: The PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.参与式准备计划研究:一项针对不同英语和西班牙语老年人群体的随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1616-1625. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4657.
7
Physicians' Views on Advance Care Planning and End-of-Life Care Conversations.医生对预先医疗照护计划和临终关怀谈话的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(6):1201-1205. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15374. Epub 2018 May 23.
8
Provider Tools for Advance Care Planning and Goals of Care Discussions: A Systematic Review.用于预先护理计划和护理目标讨论的医疗服务提供者工具:一项系统综述。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Aug;35(8):1123-1132. doi: 10.1177/1049909118760303. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
9
Facilitators and Barriers for Advance Care Planning Among Ethnic and Racial Minorities in the U.S.: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.美国少数族裔和种族群体中预先护理计划的促进因素和障碍:当前文献的系统综述
J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Oct;20(5):1277-1287. doi: 10.1007/s10903-017-0670-9.
10
Advance care planning for patients with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review of preferences and practices.慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的预先医疗照护计划:偏好与实践的系统评价。
Thorax. 2018 Mar;73(3):222-230. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209806. Epub 2017 Nov 6.