Suppr超能文献

改善预立医疗照护计划流程的临床框架:从患者自我认定的障碍入手。

A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients' self-identified barriers.

作者信息

Schickedanz Adam D, Schillinger Dean, Landefeld C Seth, Knight Sara J, Williams Brie A, Sudore Rebecca L

机构信息

University of California at San Francisco, 94121, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Jan;57(1):31-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02093.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore barriers to multiple advance care planning (ACP) steps and identify common barrier themes that impede older adults from engaging in the process as a whole.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING

General medicine clinic. San Francisco County.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred forty-three English and Spanish speakers aged 50 and older (mean 61) enrolled in an advance directive preference study.

MEASUREMENT

Six months after reviewing two advance directives, self-reported ACP engagement and barriers to each ACP step were measured with open- and closedended questions using quantitative and qualitative (thematic content) analyses.

RESULTS

Forty percent of participants did not contemplate ACP, 46% did not discuss with family or friends, 80% did not discuss with their doctor, and 90% did not document ACP wishes. Six barrier themes emerged: perceiving ACP as irrelevant (84%), personal barriers (53%), relationship concerns (46%), information needs (36%), health encounter time constraints (29%), and problems with advance directives (29%). Some barriers were endorsed at all steps (e.g., perceiving ACP as irrelevant). Others were endorsed at individual steps (e.g., relationship concerns for family or friend discussions, time constraints for doctor discussion, and problems with advance directives for documentation).

DISCUSSION

Perceiving ACP to be irrelevant was the barrier theme most often endorsed at every ACP step. Other barriers were endorsed at specific steps. Understanding ACP barriers may help clinicians prioritize and address them and may also provide a framework for tailoring interventions to improve ACP engagement.

摘要

目的

探讨多步骤预先照护计划(ACP)的障碍,并确定阻碍老年人全面参与该过程的常见障碍主题。

设计

描述性研究。

地点

旧金山市的综合内科诊所。

参与者

143名年龄在50岁及以上(平均61岁)的英语和西班牙语使用者,他们参与了一项预先医疗指示偏好研究。

测量

在回顾两份预先医疗指示六个月后,使用开放式和封闭式问题,通过定量和定性(主题内容)分析来测量自我报告的ACP参与情况以及每个ACP步骤的障碍。

结果

40%的参与者未考虑过ACP,46%未与家人或朋友讨论,80%未与医生讨论,90%未记录ACP意愿。出现了六个障碍主题:认为ACP无关紧要(84%)、个人障碍(53%)、关系问题(46%)、信息需求(36%)、医疗就诊时间限制(29%)以及预先医疗指示存在问题(29%)。有些障碍在所有步骤中都存在(例如,认为ACP无关紧要)。其他障碍则出现在个别步骤中(例如,与家人或朋友讨论时的关系问题、与医生讨论时的时间限制以及记录时预先医疗指示存在的问题)。

讨论

认为ACP无关紧要这一障碍主题在每个ACP步骤中最常被提及。其他障碍出现在特定步骤中。了解ACP障碍可能有助于临床医生确定优先事项并加以解决,还可能为量身定制干预措施以提高ACP参与度提供一个框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4458/2788611/4ee57168a02e/nihms102401f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Using video images of dementia in advance care planning.在预先护理计划中使用痴呆症的视频图像。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Apr 23;167(8):828-33. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.8.828.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验