Suppr超能文献

改善预立医疗照护计划流程的临床框架:从患者自我认定的障碍入手。

A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients' self-identified barriers.

作者信息

Schickedanz Adam D, Schillinger Dean, Landefeld C Seth, Knight Sara J, Williams Brie A, Sudore Rebecca L

机构信息

University of California at San Francisco, 94121, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Jan;57(1):31-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02093.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore barriers to multiple advance care planning (ACP) steps and identify common barrier themes that impede older adults from engaging in the process as a whole.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING

General medicine clinic. San Francisco County.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred forty-three English and Spanish speakers aged 50 and older (mean 61) enrolled in an advance directive preference study.

MEASUREMENT

Six months after reviewing two advance directives, self-reported ACP engagement and barriers to each ACP step were measured with open- and closedended questions using quantitative and qualitative (thematic content) analyses.

RESULTS

Forty percent of participants did not contemplate ACP, 46% did not discuss with family or friends, 80% did not discuss with their doctor, and 90% did not document ACP wishes. Six barrier themes emerged: perceiving ACP as irrelevant (84%), personal barriers (53%), relationship concerns (46%), information needs (36%), health encounter time constraints (29%), and problems with advance directives (29%). Some barriers were endorsed at all steps (e.g., perceiving ACP as irrelevant). Others were endorsed at individual steps (e.g., relationship concerns for family or friend discussions, time constraints for doctor discussion, and problems with advance directives for documentation).

DISCUSSION

Perceiving ACP to be irrelevant was the barrier theme most often endorsed at every ACP step. Other barriers were endorsed at specific steps. Understanding ACP barriers may help clinicians prioritize and address them and may also provide a framework for tailoring interventions to improve ACP engagement.

摘要

目的

探讨多步骤预先照护计划(ACP)的障碍,并确定阻碍老年人全面参与该过程的常见障碍主题。

设计

描述性研究。

地点

旧金山市的综合内科诊所。

参与者

143名年龄在50岁及以上(平均61岁)的英语和西班牙语使用者,他们参与了一项预先医疗指示偏好研究。

测量

在回顾两份预先医疗指示六个月后,使用开放式和封闭式问题,通过定量和定性(主题内容)分析来测量自我报告的ACP参与情况以及每个ACP步骤的障碍。

结果

40%的参与者未考虑过ACP,46%未与家人或朋友讨论,80%未与医生讨论,90%未记录ACP意愿。出现了六个障碍主题:认为ACP无关紧要(84%)、个人障碍(53%)、关系问题(46%)、信息需求(36%)、医疗就诊时间限制(29%)以及预先医疗指示存在问题(29%)。有些障碍在所有步骤中都存在(例如,认为ACP无关紧要)。其他障碍则出现在个别步骤中(例如,与家人或朋友讨论时的关系问题、与医生讨论时的时间限制以及记录时预先医疗指示存在的问题)。

讨论

认为ACP无关紧要这一障碍主题在每个ACP步骤中最常被提及。其他障碍出现在特定步骤中。了解ACP障碍可能有助于临床医生确定优先事项并加以解决,还可能为量身定制干预措施以提高ACP参与度提供一个框架。

相似文献

1
2
Engagement in multiple steps of the advance care planning process: a descriptive study of diverse older adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jun;56(6):1006-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01701.x. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
3
English and Spanish-speaking vulnerable older adults report many barriers to advance care planning.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Aug;69(8):2110-2121. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17230. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
4
Empowering Older Adults to Discuss Advance Care Planning During Clinical Visits: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16405. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
5
Preparing Older Patients With Serious Illness for Advance Care Planning Discussions in Primary Care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Aug;58(2):244-251.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.032. Epub 2019 May 7.
7
Action plans increase advance care planning documentation and engagement among English and Spanish-speaking older adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Dec;72(12):3833-3839. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19127. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
9
Exploring patient-reported barriers to advance care planning in family practice.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 25;21(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01167-0.
10
Advance Care Planning in Older Adults with CKD: Patient, Care Partner, and Clinician Perspectives.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jun 1;32(6):1527-1535. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020091298. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

4
Advance care planning with older Norwegian adults in their homes: a narrative ethnographic study.
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 19;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01378-7.
5
Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jan 25;74(739):e78-e87. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0022. Print 2024 Feb.
6
Adjusting advance care planning to older people's needs: results from focus groups and interviews.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10491-x.
7
Factors related to advance directives completion among cancer patients: a systematic review.
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 3;23(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01327-w.
9
A patient's perspective on care decisions: a qualitative interview study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 1;23(1):1335. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10342-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Planning for end-of-life care: findings from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.
Can J Aging. 2008 Spring;27(1):11-21. doi: 10.3138/cja.27.1.011.
2
Engagement in multiple steps of the advance care planning process: a descriptive study of diverse older adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jun;56(6):1006-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01701.x. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
4
An advance directive redesigned to meet the literacy level of most adults: a randomized trial.
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):165-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.015. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
5
Using video images of dementia in advance care planning.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Apr 23;167(8):828-33. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.8.828.
6
Completing an advance directive in the primary care setting: what do we need for success?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Feb;55(2):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01065.x.
7
End-of-life care for homeless patients: "she says she is there to help me in any situation".
JAMA. 2006 Dec 27;296(24):2959-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.24.2959.
8
Advance directives: ambulatory patients' knowledge and perspectives.
Am J Med. 2006 Dec;119(12):1088.e9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.02.028.
9
Brief report: identifying a proxy for health care as part of routine medical inquiry.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Nov;21(11):1188-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00570.x.
10
Physician notification of their diabetes patients' limited health literacy. A randomized, controlled trial.
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):1001-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00189.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验