Mora-Pelegrín Miguel, Montes-Berges Beatriz, Aranda María, Vázquez María Agustina, Armenteros-Martínez Elena
Department of Psychology/Social Work Faculty, University of Jaén, Paraje las Lagunillas, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
Department of Psychology/Social Psychology Area, University of Jaén, Paraje las Lagunillas, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 May 15;9(5):587. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050587.
The aim of this study was to develop a measure to evaluate the management of empathic capacity. To this end, two studies were conducted. Study 1 ( = 277, 172 females) describes the scale creation procedure, factorial validity, and internal consistency. The exploratory factor analysis yielded a five-factor model with 18 items (62.4% of the variance explained). The dimensions were as follows: D1: identification, D2: incorporation, D3: reverberation, D4: separation, and D5: projection. The internal consistency was good (alpha values ranging from 0.70 to 0.80). Study 2 ( = 480, 323 females) examined the validity (including convergent validity) of the model and the relationships with sociodemographic variables. The five-factor model showed a robust goodness of fit, χ = 240.5, < 0.001, root mean square residual (RMSR) = 0.05. The fit indices were satisfactory, Non-normed fit index (NNFI) = 0.89, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.90, mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.04. The convergent validity analysis showed that, as empathy management increased, so too did the empathy level and emotional intelligence. Some differences by age and sex were found. In conclusion, the Empathy Management Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for analyzing the empathic process that allows vulnerabilities and strengths to be estimated, which could improve professional practice in the healthcare context.
本研究的目的是开发一种评估共情能力管理的方法。为此,进行了两项研究。研究1(n = 277,172名女性)描述了量表编制过程、因子效度和内部一致性。探索性因子分析得出了一个包含18个条目的五因素模型(解释了62.4%的方差)。维度如下:D1:识别,D2:纳入,D3:反响,D4:分离,D5:投射。内部一致性良好(α值范围为0.70至0.80)。研究2(n = 480,323名女性)检验了该模型的效度(包括收敛效度)以及与社会人口学变量的关系。五因素模型显示出良好的拟合优度,χ² = 240.5,p < 0.001,均方根残差(RMSR)= 0.05。拟合指数令人满意,非规范化拟合指数(NNFI)= 0.89,比较拟合指数(CFI)= 0.90,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)= 0.04。收敛效度分析表明,随着共情管理的增加,共情水平和情商也会提高。发现了一些年龄和性别差异。总之,共情管理量表是一种有效且可靠的工具,用于分析共情过程,能够评估脆弱性和优势,这可能会改善医疗保健环境中的专业实践。