Liao Hung-Chang, Wang Ya-Huei
Department of Health Services Administration, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Education, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 1;8(4):451. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040451.
This study was intended to develop a comprehensive and psychometrically adequate professional identity scale for healthcare students and professionals based on Taiwanese cultural contexts. In order to elicit a more consistent result of the psychometric indices of the newly developed scale, the study adopted a combination of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine the consistency of the scale factors. In a pilot study of 562 randomly selected healthcare students and professionals, the EFA yielded a 33-item four-factor model with the terms "professional commitment & devotion" (16 items; 47.33% of variance), "emotional identification & belongingness" (7 items; 9.72% of variance), "professional goals & values" (5 items; 8.17% of variance), and "self-fulfillment & retention tendency" (5 items; 3.38% of variance). The CFA yielded an 18-item four-factor model with good or even excellent fit to the data, where the χ/df ratio = 1.138, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) = 0.997, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.997, and root mean square of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.016. The convergent validity and discriminant validities were also conducted to test the feasibility of the Professional Identity Scale for Healthcare Students and Professionals (PIS-HSP) scale. For the EFA model, the Cronbach's alphas for the four factors and the overall scale ranged from 0.84 to 0.96; for the CFA model, the Cronbach's alphas and composite reliabilities were, respectively, in the ranges of 0.78-0.93 and 0.78-0.97, demonstrating satisfactory reliabilities. The results proved that the developed PIS-HSP can be a reliable measurement tool to assess professional identity for healthcare students and professionals.
本研究旨在基于台湾文化背景,为医学生和医疗专业人员开发一个全面且心理测量学上足够充分的职业认同量表。为了使新开发量表的心理测量指标结果更具一致性,本研究采用探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)相结合的方法来检验量表因素的一致性。在一项对562名随机选取的医学生和医疗专业人员的预试验中,探索性因素分析得出了一个包含33个条目的四因素模型,其维度分别为“职业承诺与奉献”(16个条目;方差贡献率47.33%)、“情感认同与归属感”(7个条目;方差贡献率9.72%)、“职业目标与价值观”(5个条目;方差贡献率8.17%)以及“自我实现与留存倾向”(5个条目;方差贡献率3.38%)。验证性因素分析得出了一个包含18个条目的四因素模型,该模型对数据的拟合良好甚至堪称卓越,其中卡方自由度比(χ/df)=1.138,塔克·刘易斯指数(TLI)=0.997,比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.997,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)=0.016。同时还进行了收敛效度和区分效度检验,以测试医学生和医疗专业人员职业认同量表(PIS - HSP)的可行性。对于探索性因素分析模型,四个因素以及总量表的克朗巴哈系数在0.84至0.96之间;对于验证性因素分析模型,克朗巴哈系数和组合信度分别在0.78 - 0.93和0.78 - 0.97范围内,表明信度令人满意。结果证明,所开发的PIS - HSP可以作为评估医学生和医疗专业人员职业认同的可靠测量工具。