Druică Elena, Ianole-Călin Rodica, Băicuș Cristian, Dinescu Raluca
Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, 030018 Bucharest, Romania.
Department of Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 May 11;9(5):562. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050562.
Patient's satisfaction with community pharmacy services, and patients' trust in the information received in community pharmacies are important drivers of pharmaceutical care adoption. An online questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with the services received in pharmacies and trust in the pharmacist's advice, along with their determinants, was administered to 343 Romanian chronic and non-chronic patients. Using various statistical tests, exploratory factor analysis, and robust regression we explored determinants of satisfaction and trust. We found that satisfaction with services is predicted by pharmacists' attitude (β = 631, < 0.001), low waiting time (β = 0.180, < 0.001), affordable cost of the drugs (β = 0.09, = 0.009), and drug availability (β = 0.157, < 0.001). At the same time, trust in the information received is driven by pharmacists' attention (β = 0.610, < 0.001), whether the patient received precautionary information (β = 0.425, < 0.001), low waiting time (β = 0.287, < 0.001), and whether the respondent is a chronic patient or not (non-chronic patients express more trust, β = 0.328, = 0.04). Our study expands the existing paradigm that sees trust as a simple predictor of satisfaction by showing that trust and satisfaction are predicted by different variables, and thus they should be addressed using different strategies. In fact, we found that they share only one predictor-waiting time, highly significant in both cases. Our findings show that, without prioritizing trust in the information received in community pharmacies to reduce information asymmetry between patient and pharmacist, the focus only on patient satisfaction may lead to a scenario in which community pharmacies will end up to be better integrated in the business sector and not in the public health system.
患者对社区药房服务的满意度以及患者对在社区药房所获信息的信任度是采用药学服务的重要推动因素。我们对343名罗马尼亚慢性病患者和非慢性病患者进行了一项在线问卷调查,评估患者对药房服务的满意度、对药剂师建议的信任度及其决定因素。通过各种统计检验、探索性因素分析和稳健回归,我们探究了满意度和信任度的决定因素。我们发现,药剂师的态度(β = 631,< 0.001)、较短的等待时间(β = 0.180,< 0.001)、药品价格可承受(β = 0.09,= 0.009)以及药品可获得性(β = 0.157,< 0.001)可预测对服务的满意度。与此同时,对所获信息的信任度受药剂师的关注度(β = 0.610,< 0.001)、患者是否收到预防性信息(β = 0.425,< 0.001)、较短的等待时间(β = 0.287,< 0.001)以及受访者是否为慢性病患者(非慢性病患者表达出更高的信任度,β = 0.328,= 0.04)的驱动。我们的研究扩展了现有的范式,即认为信任是满意度的简单预测指标,通过表明信任和满意度由不同变量预测,因此应采用不同策略来处理。事实上,我们发现它们仅共享一个预测指标——等待时间,在两种情况下都具有高度显著性。我们的研究结果表明,如果不优先考虑对社区药房所获信息的信任度以减少患者与药剂师之间的信息不对称,仅关注患者满意度可能会导致一种情况,即社区药房最终会更好地融入商业领域而非公共卫生系统。