Benke Edit, Varga Patrícia, Szabó-Révész Piroska, Ambrus Rita
Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology and Regulatory Affairs, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Pharmaceutics. 2021 May 11;13(5):689. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050689.
In the case of capsule-based dry powder inhalation systems (DPIs), the selection of the appropriate capsule is important. The use of gelatin, gelatin-PEG, and HPMC capsules has become widespread in marketed capsule-based DPIs. We aimed to perform a stability test according to the ICH guideline in the above-mentioned three capsule types. The results of the novel combined formulated microcomposite were more favorable than those of the carrier-free formulation for all capsule types. The use of HPMC capsules results in the greatest stability and thus the best in vitro aerodynamic results for both DPI powders after six months. This can be explained by the fact that the residual solvent content (RSC) of the capsules differs. Under the applied conditions the RSC of the HPMC capsule decreased the least and remained within the optimal range, thus becoming less fragmented, which was reflected in the RSC, structure and morphology of the particles, as well as in the in vitro aerodynamic results (there was a difference of approximately 10% in the lung deposition results). During pharmaceutical dosage form developments, emphasis should be placed in the case of DPIs on determining which capsule type will be used for specific formulations.
对于基于胶囊的干粉吸入系统(DPI)而言,选择合适的胶囊很重要。明胶、明胶-聚乙二醇(PEG)和羟丙基甲基纤维素(HPMC)胶囊在市售的基于胶囊的DPI中已得到广泛应用。我们旨在根据国际人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)指南对上述三种胶囊类型进行稳定性测试。对于所有胶囊类型,新型复合微复合材料配方的结果均优于无载体配方。使用HPMC胶囊可实现最大稳定性,因此六个月后两种DPI粉末的体外空气动力学结果最佳。这可以通过胶囊的残留溶剂含量(RSC)不同来解释。在所应用的条件下,HPMC胶囊的RSC下降最少,且保持在最佳范围内,因此破碎较少,这反映在颗粒的RSC、结构和形态以及体外空气动力学结果中(肺部沉积结果相差约10%)。在药物剂型开发过程中,对于DPI而言,应重点确定特定配方将使用哪种胶囊类型。