Mactaggart Glen, Waran Natalie, Phillips Clive J C
Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
Faculty of Education, Humanities and Health Science, Eastern Institute of Technology, Hawke's Bay 4112, New Zealand.
Animals (Basel). 2021 May 11;11(5):1358. doi: 10.3390/ani11051358.
Identifying key welfare issues for thoroughbred racehorses could lead to an improvement in standards. A lack of scientific information on the relative importance of key issues was addressed by soliciting the views of, first, welfare experts in the industry and, second, a broader group of stakeholders, who selected the best welfare options by adaptive conjoint analysis. The experts represented racehorse breeders, veterinarians, trainers, owners, government officials, salespeople, farriers, transporters, and horse re-trainers for post-racing activities. In a focus group meeting, the experts identified fourteen key welfare issues, each with two to four levels that related to common husbandry practices. Then, in an internet survey, 224 stakeholders ranked the issues using adaptive conjoint analysis, in declining importance, as: horsemanship > health and disease > education of the horse > track design and surface > ventilation > stabling > weaning > transport > nutrition > wastage > heat and humidity > whips > environment > gear. Relatively uniform responses to the survey by the different stakeholder groups suggested that there was a common view on what had the biggest impact on welfare. An exception was a greater rating given by women than men to the importance of correct horse nutrition. The rating of importance for welfare of different levels of provision of each issue mostly conformed to the scientific evidence, with the exception of weaning. This understanding of the importance of welfare issues for thoroughbred racehorses could be used to target interventions to the most serious problems.
识别纯种赛马的关键福利问题可能会促使标准得到提高。为了解决关键问题相对重要性方面科学信息匮乏的问题,首先征求了业内福利专家的意见,其次征求了更广泛的利益相关者群体的意见,他们通过适应性联合分析选出了最佳福利选项。专家代表包括赛马饲养者、兽医、驯马师、马主、政府官员、销售人员、蹄铁匠、运输人员以及负责赛马退役后再训练活动的人员。在一次焦点小组会议上,专家们确定了14个关键福利问题,每个问题有两到四个与常见饲养管理做法相关的等级。然后,在一项网络调查中,224名利益相关者通过适应性联合分析对这些问题进行了排序,按重要性递减依次为:马术 > 健康与疾病 > 马匹教育 > 赛道设计与地面 > 通风 > 马厩 > 断奶 > 运输 > 营养 > 浪费 > 热度与湿度 > 马鞭 > 环境 > 装备。不同利益相关者群体对调查的回应相对一致,这表明对于对福利影响最大的因素存在共识。一个例外是女性对正确马匹营养重要性的评分高于男性。除了断奶问题外,每个问题不同供应水平对福利重要性的评分大多符合科学证据。这种对纯种赛马福利问题重要性的理解可用于针对最严重的问题进行干预。