• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣与传导系统之间的有效距离是经导管主动脉瓣植入术后持续性左束支传导阻滞的独立预测因子。

Effective Distance between Aortic Valve and Conduction System Is an Independent Predictor of Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 11;57(5):476. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050476.

DOI:10.3390/medicina57050476
PMID:34064932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8150689/
Abstract

Persistent left bundle branch block (P-LBBB) has been associated with poor clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. We hypothesized that the distance from the aortic valve to the proximal conduction system, expressed as the effective distance between the aortic valve and conduction system (EDACS), can predict the occurrence of P-LBBB in patients undergoing a TAVI procedure. In a retrospective study, data from 269 patients were analyzed. EDACS was determined using two longitudinal CT sections. Sixty-four of the patients developed P-LBBB. EDACS ranged between -3 and +18 mm. EDACS was significantly smaller in P-LBBB than in non-P-LBBB patients (4.6 (2.2-7.1) vs. 8.0 (5.8-10.2) mm, median values (interquartile range); < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.78 for predicting P-LBBB based on EDACS. In patients with EDACS of ≤3 mm and >10 mm, the chance of developing P-LBBB was ≥50% and <10%, respectively. A small EDACS increases the risk for the development of P-LBBB during TAVI by a factor of >25. As EDACS can be measured pre-procedurally, it may be a valuable additional factor to weigh the risks of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.

摘要

持续性左束支传导阻滞(P-LBBB)与经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后较差的临床结果相关。我们假设,主动脉瓣与近端传导系统之间的距离(用主动脉瓣与传导系统之间的有效距离(EDACS)表示)可以预测 TAVI 患者发生 P-LBBB 的情况。在一项回顾性研究中,分析了 269 名患者的数据。使用两个纵向 CT 节段确定 EDACS。64 名患者发生了 P-LBBB。EDACS 范围在-3 至+18mm 之间。P-LBBB 患者的 EDACS 明显小于非 P-LBBB 患者(4.6(2.2-7.1)比 8.0(5.8-10.2)mm,中位数(四分位距);<0.05)。接受者操作特征分析显示,基于 EDACS 预测 P-LBBB 的曲线下面积为 0.78。在 EDACS 为≤3mm 和>10mm 的患者中,发生 P-LBBB 的机会分别≥50%和<10%。EDACS 较小会使 TAVI 期间发生 P-LBBB 的风险增加>25 倍。由于 EDACS 可以在术前测量,因此它可能是衡量经导管和手术主动脉瓣置换风险的一个有价值的附加因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/317a1c21d943/medicina-57-00476-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/d3808df41ddb/medicina-57-00476-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/a29d842033b5/medicina-57-00476-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/f515152f599b/medicina-57-00476-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/0c1dbb7c9cb7/medicina-57-00476-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/8381600b16ff/medicina-57-00476-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/317a1c21d943/medicina-57-00476-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/d3808df41ddb/medicina-57-00476-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/a29d842033b5/medicina-57-00476-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/f515152f599b/medicina-57-00476-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/0c1dbb7c9cb7/medicina-57-00476-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/8381600b16ff/medicina-57-00476-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/911c/8150689/317a1c21d943/medicina-57-00476-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Effective Distance between Aortic Valve and Conduction System Is an Independent Predictor of Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.主动脉瓣与传导系统之间的有效距离是经导管主动脉瓣植入术后持续性左束支传导阻滞的独立预测因子。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 11;57(5):476. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050476.
2
Increased Rate of New-onset Left Bundle Branch Block in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (From a National Registry).经导管主动脉瓣植入术后二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者新发左束支传导阻滞的发生率增加(来自国家注册中心)。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;156:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.046. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
3
Clinical impact of a new left bundle branch block following TAVI implantation: 1-year results of the TAVIK cohort.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后新发左束支传导阻滞的临床影响:TAVIK队列的1年结果
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Apr;104(4):351-62. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0791-2. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
4
Left Bundle Branch Block after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with Edwards Sapien 3 Valve: Influence of the Valve Depth Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用爱德华 Sapien 3 瓣膜后出现左束支传导阻滞:瓣膜植入深度的影响
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Nov;20(11):949-955. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
5
Trends in the occurrence of new conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后新传导异常发生情况的趋势
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr;85(5):E144-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25765. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
6
Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中传导障碍的发生和持续存在。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 7;57(7):695. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070695.
7
Classical mechanical dyssynchrony is rare in transcatheter aortic valve implantation-induced left bundle branch block.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后导致左束支传导阻滞时,经典的机械不同步较为少见。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar 1;20(3):271-278. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey127.
8
Clinical Impact of New-Onset Left Bundle-Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Japanese Population - A Single High-Volume Center Experience.日本人群经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞的临床影响:单一大容量中心经验
Circ J. 2020 May 25;84(6):1012-1019. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1071. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
9
Comparison of incidence and predictors of left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the CoreValve versus the Edwards valve.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用 CoreValve 与 Edwards 瓣膜的左束支传导阻滞发生率及预测因素比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 15;112(4):554-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.026. Epub 2013 May 29.
10
Clinical implications of new-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: analysis of the PARTNER experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞的临床意义:PARTNER 经验分析。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jun 21;35(24):1599-607. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht376. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Conduction Disturbances and Outcome After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis.二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者行外科主动脉瓣置换术后的传导障碍与预后
Circulation. 2025 Feb 4;151(5):288-298. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.070753. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Morphology as a Predictor of Conductance Disturbances Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导障碍与左心室流出道形态的相关性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct;13(19):e034936. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034936. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Artificial intelligence and transcatheter aortic valve implantation-induced conduction disturbances-adding insight beyond the human 'I'.

本文引用的文献

1
New-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with adverse long-term clinical outcomes in intermediate-risk patients: an analysis from the PARTNER II trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞与中危患者不良长期临床结局相关:来自 PARTNER II 试验的分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 14;40(27):2218-2227. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz227.
2
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block Following TAVR.经 TAVR 治疗后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞患者的长期结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 24;12(12):1175-1184. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.025. Epub 2019 May 22.
3
人工智能与经导管主动脉瓣植入术引起的传导障碍——超越人类“自我”的深入见解
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Jun 3;5(4):395-396. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae040. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Occurrence and Persistency of Conduction Disturbances during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中传导障碍的发生和持续存在。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 7;57(7):695. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070695.
Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导障碍:现状与未来展望。
Circulation. 2017 Sep 12;136(11):1049-1069. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028352.
4
High resolution 3-Dimensional imaging of the human cardiac conduction system from microanatomy to mathematical modeling.人体心脏传导系统的高分辨率三维成像:从微观解剖学到数学建模。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 3;7(1):7188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07694-8.
5
A Highly Predictive Risk Model for Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR.经 TAVR 治疗后植入起搏器的高预测风险模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1139-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Comparison of SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve stent-frame expansion: evaluation using multi-slice computed tomography.SAPIEN 3与SAPIEN XT经导管心脏瓣膜支架框架扩张的比较:使用多层计算机断层扫描进行评估
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Sep;17(9):1054-62. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew032. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
7
Inverse Relationship Between Membranous Septal Length and the Risk of Atrioventricular Block in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中膜性间隔长度与房室传导阻滞风险的反比关系。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 17;8(9):1218-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.010.
8
Trends in the occurrence of new conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后新传导异常发生情况的趋势
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr;85(5):E144-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25765. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
9
Frequency and prognosis of new bundle branch block induced by surgical aortic valve replacement.外科主动脉瓣置换术所致新发束支传导阻滞的发生率及预后
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Feb;47(2):e47-53. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu435. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
10
Clinical impact of a new left bundle branch block following TAVI implantation: 1-year results of the TAVIK cohort.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后新发左束支传导阻滞的临床影响:TAVIK队列的1年结果
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Apr;104(4):351-62. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0791-2. Epub 2014 Nov 12.