Suppr超能文献

二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者行外科主动脉瓣置换术后的传导障碍与预后

Conduction Disturbances and Outcome After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis.

作者信息

Wedin Johan O, Näslund Viktor, Rodin Sergey, Simonson Oscar E, Flachskampf Frank A, James Stefan K, Ståhle Elisabeth, Grinnemo Karl-Henrik

机构信息

Cardio-Thoracic Translational Medicine Lab (J.O.W., S.R., O.E.S., E.S., K-H.G.), Uppsala University, Sweden.

Departments of Surgical Sciences (J.O.W., S.R., O.E.S., E.S., K-H.G.), Uppsala University, Sweden.

出版信息

Circulation. 2025 Feb 4;151(5):288-298. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.070753. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the incidence and prognostic implications of new-onset conduction disturbances after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortic stenosis (AS) versus patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) AS (ie, BAV-AS and TAV-AS, respectively). Additionally, the study included stratification of BAV patients according to subtype.

METHODS

In this cohort study, the incidence of postoperative third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block with subsequent permanent pacemaker requirement and new-onset left bundle-branch block (LBBB) was investigated in 1147 consecutive patients without preoperative conduction disorder who underwent isolated SAVR (with or without ascending aortic surgery) between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2022. The groups were stratified by aortic valve morphology (BAV, n=589; TAV, n=558). The outcomes of interests were new-onset third-degree AV block or new-onset LBBB during the index hospitalization. The impact of new-onset postoperative conduction disturbances on survival was investigated in BAV-AS and TAV-AS patients during a median follow-up of 8.2 years. BAV morphology was further categorized according to the Sievers and Schmidtke classification system (possible in 307 BAV-AS patients) to explore association between BAV subtypes and new-onset conduction disturbances after SAVR.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of third-degree AV block and new-onset LBBB after SAVR was 4.5% and 7.8%, respectively. BAV-AS patients had a higher incidence of both new-onset third-degree AV block (6.5% versus 2.5%; =0.001) and new-onset LBBB (9.7% versus 5.7%; =0.013) compared with TAV-AS patients. New-onset LBBB was associated with an increased all-cause mortality during follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.12-2.30]; =0.011), whereas new-onset third-degree AV block was not associated with worse prognosis. Subgroup analysis of the BAV cohort revealed that BAV-AS patients with fusion of the right- and non-coronary cusps had the highest risk of new-onset third-degree AV block (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 8.33 [95% CI, 3.31-20.97]; <0.001, with TAV as reference group) and new-onset LBBB (aOR, 4.03 [95% CI, 1.84-8.82]; <0.001, with TAV as reference group), whereas no significant association was observed for the other BAV subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

New-onset LBBB after SAVR is associated with increased all-cause mortality during follow-up, and is more frequent complication in BAV AS patients compared with TAV-AS patients. BAV-AS patients with fusion of the right- and non-coronary cusps have an increased risk for conduction disturbances after SAVR. This should be taken into consideration when managing these patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)主动脉狭窄(AS)患者与三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV)AS患者(即分别为BAV-AS和TAV-AS)接受外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)后新发传导障碍的发生率及其对预后的影响。此外,该研究还包括根据亚型对BAV患者进行分层。

方法

在这项队列研究中,对2005年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间连续1147例术前无传导障碍且接受单纯SAVR(有或无升主动脉手术)的患者,调查术后三度房室(AV)传导阻滞并随后需要永久起搏器以及新发左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的发生率。根据主动脉瓣形态将患者分组(BAV,n = 589;TAV,n = 558)。关注的结局是在本次住院期间新发三度AV传导阻滞或新发LBBB。在BAV-AS和TAV-AS患者中位随访8.2年期间,研究术后新发传导障碍对生存的影响。根据Sievers和Schmidtke分类系统对BAV形态进行进一步分类(307例BAV-AS患者可行),以探讨BAV亚型与SAVR后新发传导障碍之间的关联。

结果

SAVR后三度AV传导阻滞和新发LBBB的总体发生率分别为4.5%和7.8%。与TAV-AS患者相比,BAV-AS患者新发三度AV传导阻滞(6.5%对2.5%;P = 0.001)和新发LBBB(9.7%对5.7%;P = 0.013)的发生率更高。新发LBBB与随访期间全因死亡率增加相关(校正风险比,1.60 [95% CI,1.12 - 2.30];P = 0.011),而新发三度AV传导阻滞与预后较差无关。BAV队列的亚组分析显示,右冠瓣和无冠瓣融合的BAV-AS患者新发三度AV传导阻滞(校正比值比[aOR],8.33 [95% CI,3.31 - 20.97];P < 0.001,以TAV为参照组)和新发LBBB(aOR,4.03 [95% CI,1.84 - 8.82];P < 0.001,以TAV为参照组)的风险最高,而其他BAV亚型未观察到显著关联。

结论

SAVR后新发LBBB与随访期间全因死亡率增加相关,并且与TAV-AS患者相比,在BAV AS患者中是更常见的并发症。右冠瓣和无冠瓣融合的BAV-AS患者SAVR后发生传导障碍的风险增加。在管理这些患者时应考虑到这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d896/11789612/0347f5f6211c/cir-151-288-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验