• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对一般研究结果更新的偏好:来自两个机构的基因组研究参与者调查

Preferences for Updates on General Research Results: A Survey of Participants in Genomic Research from Two Institutions.

作者信息

Taylor Casey Overby, Manov Natalie Flaks, Crew Katherine D, Weng Chunhua, Connolly John J, Chute Christopher G, Ford Daniel E, Lehmann Harold, Rahm Alanna Kulchak, Kullo Iftikhar J, Caraballo Pedro J, Holm Ingrid A, Mathews Debra

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, and The Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2021 May 11;11(5):399. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050399.

DOI:10.3390/jpm11050399
PMID:34065005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8151672/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

There is a need for multimodal strategies to keep research participants informed about study results. Our aim was to characterize preferences of genomic research participants from two institutions along four dimensions of general research result updates: content, timing, mechanism, and frequency.

METHODS

We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey that was administered from 25 June 2018 to 5 December 2018.

RESULTS

397 participants completed the survey, most of whom (96%) expressed a desire to receive research updates. Preferences with high endorsement included: update content (brief descriptions of major findings, descriptions of purpose and goals, and educational material); update timing (when the research is completed, when findings are reviewed, when findings are published, and when the study status changes); update mechanism (email with updates, and email newsletter); and update frequency (every three months). Hierarchical cluster analyses based on the four update preferences identified four profiles of participants with similar preference patterns. Very few participants in the largest profile were comfortable with budgeting less money for research activities so that researchers have money to set up services to send research result updates to study participants.

CONCLUSION

Future studies may benefit from exploring preferences for research result updates, as we have in our study. In addition, this work provides evidence of a need for funders to incentivize researchers to communicate results to participants.

摘要

未标注

需要采用多模式策略让研究参与者了解研究结果。我们的目的是从一般研究结果更新的四个维度(内容、时间、机制和频率)来描述来自两个机构的基因组研究参与者的偏好。

方法

我们于2018年6月25日至2018年12月5日进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查。

结果

397名参与者完成了调查,其中大多数(96%)表示希望收到研究进展更新。认可度较高的偏好包括:更新内容(主要发现的简要描述、目的和目标的描述以及教育材料);更新时间(研究完成时、结果审核时、结果发表时以及研究状态变化时);更新机制(带有更新内容的电子邮件和电子邮件通讯);以及更新频率(每三个月一次)。基于这四种更新偏好的层次聚类分析确定了四种具有相似偏好模式的参与者类型。在最大的类型中,很少有参与者愿意为研究活动减少预算,以便研究人员有钱设立向研究参与者发送研究结果更新的服务。

结论

未来的研究可能会从探索研究结果更新的偏好中受益,就像我们在研究中所做的那样。此外,这项工作提供了证据,表明资助者需要激励研究人员向参与者传达结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992a/8151672/887912879f96/jpm-11-00399-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992a/8151672/31ae09284af0/jpm-11-00399-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992a/8151672/c5f8b8779bc2/jpm-11-00399-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992a/8151672/d0bcb8077625/jpm-11-00399-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992a/8151672/887912879f96/jpm-11-00399-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992a/8151672/31ae09284af0/jpm-11-00399-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992a/8151672/c5f8b8779bc2/jpm-11-00399-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992a/8151672/d0bcb8077625/jpm-11-00399-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/992a/8151672/887912879f96/jpm-11-00399-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Preferences for Updates on General Research Results: A Survey of Participants in Genomic Research from Two Institutions.对一般研究结果更新的偏好:来自两个机构的基因组研究参与者调查
J Pers Med. 2021 May 11;11(5):399. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050399.
2
Communicating with biobank participants: preferences for receiving and providing updates to researchers.与生物样本库参与者沟通:接收和向研究人员提供最新信息的偏好
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Apr;24(4):708-12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1375. Epub 2015 Jan 18.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.健康研究参与者对接收研究结果的偏好。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
7
Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results.评估研究参与者对接收研究结果的偏好。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 4;4(3):243-249. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.427.
8
Discussing the possibility of fertility treatment being unsuccessful as part of routine care offered at clinics: patients' experiences, willingness, and preferences.探讨在诊所常规护理中讨论生育治疗不成功的可能性:患者的体验、意愿和偏好。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Jul 5;38(7):1332-1344. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead096.
9
Establishing communication challenges and preferences among clinical trial participants in an under-resourced setting to improve adherence to study visits and participant retention.在资源匮乏的环境中确定临床试验参与者之间的沟通挑战和偏好,以提高对研究访视的依从性和参与者保留率。
Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;19(1):81-85. doi: 10.1177/17407745211062077. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
10
Exploring bi-directional and SMS messaging for communications between Public Health Agencies and their stakeholders: a qualitative study.探索公共卫生机构与其利益相关者之间通信的双向和短信消息传递:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 8;15:621. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1980-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Current global practice and implications for future research on disseminating health research results to study participants: A systematic review.当前向研究参与者传播健康研究结果的全球实践及对未来研究的启示:一项系统综述。
PLoS Med. 2025 Aug 14;22(8):e1004569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004569. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Ethical considerations for sharing aggregate results from pragmatic clinical trials.关于分享实用临床试验汇总结果的伦理考量。
Clin Trials. 2025 Apr;22(2):248-254. doi: 10.1177/17407745241290782. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
3
Health Research with Data in a Time of Privacy: Which Information do Patients Want?

本文引用的文献

1
The Future of Biobanking: What Is Next?生物样本库的未来:接下来会怎样?
BioTech (Basel). 2020 Nov 23;9(4):23. doi: 10.3390/biotech9040023.
2
The Andalusian Registry of Donors for Biomedical Research: Five Years of History.安达卢西亚生物医学研究捐赠者登记处:五年历史
BioTech (Basel). 2021 Mar 12;10(1):6. doi: 10.3390/biotech10010006.
3
Biobanks-A Platform for Scientific and Biomedical Research.生物样本库——科学与生物医学研究的平台
在隐私时代进行健康数据研究:患者希望获得哪些信息?
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Oct;18(4):304-316. doi: 10.1177/15562646231181439. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Development of Written Materials for Participants in an Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Screening Trial.为阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症筛查试验参与者编写书面材料
J Patient Exp. 2022 Apr 12;9:23743735221092573. doi: 10.1177/23743735221092573. eCollection 2022.
5
Identification and management of pragmatic clinical trial collateral findings: A current understanding and directions for future research.实用临床试验伴随发现的识别和管理:当前的理解和未来研究方向。
Healthc (Amst). 2021 Dec;9(4):100586. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100586. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Jul 16;10(7):485. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10070485.
4
Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results.评估研究参与者对接收研究结果的偏好。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 4;4(3):243-249. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.427.
5
Participant choices for return of genomic results in the eMERGE Network.eMERGE 网络中基因组结果回报的参与者选择。
Genet Med. 2020 Nov;22(11):1821-1829. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0905-3. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Return of Value in the New Era of Biomedical Research-One Size Will Not Fit All.生物医学研究新时代的价值回归——一刀切并不适用。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Oct-Dec;10(4):265-275. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1666175. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
7
What People Want to Know About Their Genes: A Critical Review of the Literature on Large-Scale Genome Sequencing Studies.人们想了解自己基因的哪些方面:对大规模基因组测序研究文献的批判性综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Aug 8;6(3):96. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6030096.
8
Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants.迈向“参与2.0”:一项关于生物样本库参与者动态同意的研究见解
Digit Health. 2015 Sep 28;1:2055207615605644. doi: 10.1177/2055207615605644. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
9
Return of Research Results to Study Participants: Uncharted and Untested.研究结果返回研究参与者:未知且未经检验。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):435-436. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7898.
10
Black-White Differences in Willingness to Participate and Perceptions About Health Research: Results from the Population-Based HealthStreet Study.黑白人群参与健康研究的意愿和对健康研究的看法的差异:基于人群的 HealthStreet 研究的结果。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2019 Apr;21(2):299-305. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0729-2.