Suppr超能文献

早期乳腺癌新辅助治疗后的复发模式,根据残余癌负担指数和新辅助治疗强度的降低情况

Patterns of Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer, according to the Residual Cancer Burden Index and Reductions in Neoadjuvant Treatment Intensity.

作者信息

Suppan Christoph, Posch Florian, Mueller Hannah Deborah, Mischitz Nina, Steiner Daniel, Klocker Eva Valentina, Setaffy Lisa, Bargfrieder Ute, Hammer Robert, Hauser Hubert, Jost Philipp J, Dandachi Nadia, Lax Sigurd, Balic Marija

机构信息

Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.

Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz South-West, 8020 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 20;13(10):2492. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102492.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognostic performance of the residual cancer burden (RCB) score is a promising tool for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. We independently evaluated the prognostic value of RCB scores in an extended validation cohort. Additionally, we analyzed the association between chemotherapy dose reduction and RCB scores.

METHODS

In this extended validation study, 367 breast cancer patients with available RCB scores were followed up for recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). We also computed standardized cumulative doses of anthracyclines and taxanes (A/Ts) to investigate a potential interaction between neoadjuvant chemotherapy dose reduction and RCB scores.

RESULTS

Higher RCB scores were consistently associated with adverse clinical outcomes across different molecular subtypes (HR for RFS = 1.60, 95% CI 1.33-1.93, < 0.0001; HR for DDFS = 1.70, 95% CI 1.39-2.05, < 0.0001; HR for OS = 1.67, 95% CI 1.34-2.08, < 0.0001). The adverse impact prevailed throughout 5 years of follow-up, with a peak for relapse risk between 1-2 years after surgery. Clinical outcomes of patients with RCB class 1 did not differ substantially at 5 years compared to RCB class 0. A total of 180 patients (49.1%) underwent dose reduction of neoadjuvant A/T chemotherapy. We observed a statistically significant interaction between dose reduction and higher RCB scores (interaction -value = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm RCB score as a prognostic marker for RFS, DDFS, and OS independent of the molecular subtype. Importantly, we show that lower doses of cumulative neoadjuvant A/T were associated with higher RCB scores in patients who required a dose reduction.

摘要

背景

残余癌负荷(RCB)评分的预后性能是接受新辅助治疗的乳腺癌患者的一种有前景的工具。我们在一个扩大的验证队列中独立评估了RCB评分的预后价值。此外,我们分析了化疗剂量减少与RCB评分之间的关联。

方法

在这项扩大的验证研究中,对367例有可用RCB评分的乳腺癌患者进行无复发生存期(RFS)、远处无病生存期(DDFS)和总生存期(OS)的随访。我们还计算了蒽环类药物和紫杉烷类药物(A/Ts)的标准化累积剂量,以研究新辅助化疗剂量减少与RCB评分之间的潜在相互作用。

结果

在不同分子亚型中,较高的RCB评分始终与不良临床结局相关(RFS的HR = 1.60,95%CI 1.33 - 1.93,P < 0.0001;DDFS的HR = 1.70,95%CI 1.39 - 2.05,P < 0.0001;OS的HR = 1.67,95%CI 1.34 - 2.08,P < 0.0001)。在整个5年的随访中,这种不良影响一直存在,术后1 - 2年复发风险达到峰值。与RCB 0级患者相比,RCB 1级患者5年时的临床结局没有显著差异。共有180例患者(49.1%)接受了新辅助A/T化疗的剂量减少。我们观察到剂量减少与较高的RCB评分之间存在统计学上的显著相互作用(相互作用P值 = 0.042)。

结论

我们的结果证实RCB评分是独立于分子亚型的RFS、DDFS和OS的预后标志物。重要的是,我们表明,在需要减少剂量的患者中,新辅助A/T累积剂量较低与较高的RCB评分相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d72/8161089/e2bee3b3be43/cancers-13-02492-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验