Bevilacqua Alessandro, Calabrò Diletta, Malavasi Silvia, Ricci Claudio, Casadei Riccardo, Campana Davide, Baiocco Serena, Fanti Stefano, Ambrosini Valentina
Advanced Research Center for Electronic Systems (ARCES), University of Bologna, I-40125 Bologna, Italy.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering (DISI), University of Bologna, I-40136 Bologna, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 12;11(5):870. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050870.
Predicting grade 1 (G1) and 2 (G2) primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (panNET) is crucial to foresee panNET clinical behaviour. Fifty-one patients with G1-G2 primary panNET demonstrated by pre-surgical [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and diagnostic conventional imaging were grouped according to the tumour grade assessment method: histology on the whole excised primary lesion (HS) or biopsy (BS). First-order and second-order radiomic features (RFs) were computed from SUV maps for the whole tumour volume on HS. The RFs showing the lowest -values and the highest area under the curve (AUC) were selected. Three radiomic models were assessed: A (trained on HS, validated on BS), B (trained on BS, validated on HS), and C (using the cross-validation on the whole dataset). The second-order normalized homogeneity and entropy was the most effective RFs couple predicting G2 and G1. The best performance was achieved by model A (test AUC = 0.90, sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.89), followed by model C (median test AUC = 0.87, sensitivity = 0.83, specificity = 0.82). Model B performed worse. Using HS to train a radiomic model leads to the best prediction, although a "hybrid" (HS+BS) population performs better than biopsy-only. The non-invasive prediction of panNET grading may be especially useful in lesions not amenable to biopsy while [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC heterogeneity might recommend FDG PET/CT.
预测1级(G1)和2级(G2)原发性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(panNET)对于预见panNET的临床行为至关重要。51例经术前[68Ga]镓-多他环素PET/CT和诊断性传统成像证实为G1-G2原发性panNET的患者,根据肿瘤分级评估方法进行分组:完整切除的原发性病变的组织学检查(HS)或活检(BS)。从HS上整个肿瘤体积的SUV图中计算出一阶和二阶放射组学特征(RFs)。选择显示最低值和最高曲线下面积(AUC)的RFs。评估了三种放射组学模型:A(在HS上训练,在BS上验证)、B(在BS上训练,在HS上验证)和C(对整个数据集使用交叉验证)。二阶归一化均匀性和熵是预测G2和G1最有效的RFs组合。模型A表现最佳(测试AUC = 0.90,敏感性 = 0.88,特异性 = 0.89),其次是模型C(中位测试AUC = 0.87,敏感性 = 0.83,特异性 = 0.82)。模型B表现较差。使用HS训练放射组学模型可获得最佳预测,尽管“混合”(HS+BS)人群的表现优于仅活检人群。panNET分级的非侵入性预测在不适合活检的病变中可能特别有用,而[68Ga]镓-多他环素的异质性可能推荐FDG PET/CT。