Srinivasan Mythily
Department of Oral Pathology, Medicine and Radiology, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Dent J (Basel). 2021 May 13;9(5):56. doi: 10.3390/dj9050056.
As the landscape of oral healthcare and the delivery of services continue to undergo change, the dental hygienist plays an increasing role in assisting dentists with oral diagnosis and preventive strategies. Hence, the dental hygiene curriculum standards require biomedical science instructions, including general and oral pathology. Student learning and cognitive competencies are often measured using multiple-choice questions (MCQs). The objectives of this study were to perform a longitudinal analysis of test items and to evaluate their relation to the absolute grades of the oral pathology course in the dental hygiene curriculum. A total of 1033 MCQs covering different concepts of oral pathology administered from 2015 through 2019 were analyzed for difficulty and discriminatory indices, and the differences between the years were determined by one-way ANOVA. Test reliability as determined by the average KR-20 value was 0.7 or higher for each exam. The mean difficulty index for all exams was 0.73 +/- 0.05, and that of the discriminatory index was 0.33 +/- 0.05. Wide variations were observed in the discriminatory indices of test items with approximately the same difficulty index, as well as in the grade distribution in each cohort. Furthermore, longitudinal data analyses identified low achieving cohorts amongst the groups evaluated for the same knowledge domain, taught with the same instruction, and using similar test tools. This suggest that comparative analyses of tests could offer feedback not only on student learning attributes, but also potentially on the admission processes to the dental hygiene program.
随着口腔医疗保健格局和服务提供方式不断变化,口腔保健员在协助牙医进行口腔诊断和预防策略方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。因此,口腔保健课程标准要求进行生物医学科学教学,包括普通病理学和口腔病理学。学生的学习和认知能力通常通过多项选择题(MCQ)来衡量。本研究的目的是对测试项目进行纵向分析,并评估它们与口腔保健课程中口腔病理学课程绝对成绩的关系。分析了2015年至2019年期间管理的总共1033道涵盖口腔病理学不同概念的多项选择题的难度和区分度指数,并通过单因素方差分析确定年份之间的差异。每次考试由平均KR-20值确定的测试信度为0.7或更高。所有考试的平均难度指数为0.73±0.05,区分度指数为0.33±0.05。在难度指数大致相同的测试项目的区分度指数以及每个队列的成绩分布中观察到很大差异。此外,纵向数据分析在针对相同知识领域进行评估、采用相同教学方法并使用类似测试工具的组中识别出成绩较差的队列。这表明测试的比较分析不仅可以提供有关学生学习属性的反馈,还可能提供有关口腔保健课程录取过程的反馈。