• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直腿抬高试验(拉塞格氏征)在腰椎间盘突出症诊断中的临床意义。观察者间差异及与手术 findings 的相关性。 (这里“findings”结合语境推测可能是指手术所见情况等,但原英文表述不太准确规范)

The clinical significance of straight-leg raising (Lasègue's sign) in the diagnosis of prolapsed lumbar disc. Interobserver variation and correlation with surgical finding.

作者信息

Kosteljanetz M, Bang F, Schmidt-Olsen S

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Aalborg Sygehus, Denmark.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Apr;13(4):393-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198804000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00007632-198804000-00003
PMID:3406846
Abstract

Limitation of straight-leg raising (SLR) (Lasègue's sign) is considered an important test in the diagnosis of herniated lumbar disc disease. In a prospective study of 55 patients suffering from unilateral sciatica this sign was evaluated. Two aspects were investigated: 1) the interobserver variation, and 2) the correlation between the result of the test and the surgical finding. There was considerable interobserver variation among three observers concerning the measured angle at which pain was elicited. However, in 2/3 to 3/4 of the cases the variation amounted to 10 degrees or less. There was also some discordance in the classification of the type of pain that was elicited. Fifty-two patients underwent surgery; 45 had a prolapsed disc. SLR was "positive" in 49 cases, 43 of whom harbored a prolapsed disc. Crossed SLR was noted in 20, 19 of whom had a prolapsed disc at surgery. Absence of SLR limitation does not preclude the presence of a herniated lumbar disc.

摘要

直腿抬高试验(拉塞格征)受限被认为是诊断腰椎间盘突出症的一项重要检查。在一项针对55例单侧坐骨神经痛患者的前瞻性研究中,对该体征进行了评估。研究了两个方面:1)观察者间的差异,以及2)检查结果与手术发现之间的相关性。三位观察者在引发疼痛的测量角度方面存在相当大的观察者间差异。然而,在2/3至3/4的病例中,差异为10度或更小。在引发疼痛类型的分类方面也存在一些不一致。52例患者接受了手术;45例有椎间盘突出。直腿抬高试验在49例中呈“阳性”,其中43例有椎间盘突出。20例出现交叉直腿抬高试验阳性,其中19例在手术时有椎间盘突出。直腿抬高试验不受限并不能排除腰椎间盘突出的存在。

相似文献

1
The clinical significance of straight-leg raising (Lasègue's sign) in the diagnosis of prolapsed lumbar disc. Interobserver variation and correlation with surgical finding.直腿抬高试验(拉塞格氏征)在腰椎间盘突出症诊断中的临床意义。观察者间差异及与手术 findings 的相关性。 (这里“findings”结合语境推测可能是指手术所见情况等,但原英文表述不太准确规范)
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Apr;13(4):393-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198804000-00003.
2
Sciatic tension signs and lumbar disc herniation.坐骨神经张力体征与腰椎间盘突出症
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 1;19(9):1066-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199405000-00013.
3
The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症患者中垂肩试验和直腿抬高试验的敏感性和特异性。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;14(2):87-91. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e31816b2f99.
4
Predictive value of clinical and surgical findings in patients with lumbago-sciatica. A prospective study (Part I).腰腿痛患者临床及手术 findings 的预测价值。一项前瞻性研究(第一部分) 。 注:这里“findings”直译为“发现”,在医学语境中可灵活处理为更合适的表述,比如“检查结果”等,但由于要求不能添加解释,所以保留了原词。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1984;73(1-2):67-76. doi: 10.1007/BF01401785.
5
Significance of a persistent positive straight leg raising test after lumbar disc surgery.
J Neurosurg. 1999 Jul;91(1 Suppl):50-3. doi: 10.3171/spi.1999.91.1.0050.
6
[Lasegue's test as prognostic factor for patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery].[直腿抬高试验作为腰椎间盘手术患者的预后因素]
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2004 Apr;15(2):138-43. doi: 10.1016/s1130-1473(04)70493-5.
7
Value of the bell test and the hyperextension test for diagnosis in sciatica associated with disc herniation: comparison with Lasègue's sign and the crossed Lasègue's sign.直腿抬高试验和过伸试验在诊断椎间盘突出症所致坐骨神经痛中的价值:与拉塞格氏征及交叉拉塞格氏征的比较
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 Apr;40(4):460-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/40.4.460.
8
Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain.对下背痛患者因椎间盘突出导致的腰椎神经根病进行体格检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17(2):CD007431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007431.pub2.
9
The straight leg raising test and the severity of symptoms in lumbar disc herniation. A preoperative evaluation.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jan 1;20(1):27-30. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199501000-00006.
10
Low back pain on passive straight leg raising: the anterior theca as a source of pain.被动直腿抬高试验时的下腰痛:前鞘膜作为疼痛来源
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 1;30(3):342-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152378.93868.c8.

引用本文的文献

1
Movements of the lumbo-sacral nerve roots in the spinal canal induced by straight leg raising test: an anatomical study.直腿抬高试验诱发的腰骶神经根在椎管内的运动:一项解剖学研究
Surg Radiol Anat. 2018 Nov;40(11):1223-1230. doi: 10.1007/s00276-018-2084-3. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
2
Spinal manipulation in the treatment of patients with MRI-confirmed lumbar disc herniation and sacroiliac joint hypomobility: a quasi-experimental study.脊柱推拿治疗MRI确诊的腰椎间盘突出症和骶髂关节活动度降低患者:一项准实验研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 May 17;26:16. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0185-z. eCollection 2018.
3
Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.
腰痛的临床分类:基于系统评价的最佳证据诊断规则
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 12;18(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1549-6.
4
Correlation of 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Clinical and Intraoperative Findings for Lumbar Disc Herniation.1.5 特斯拉磁共振成像与腰椎间盘突出症临床及术中表现的相关性
Asian Spine J. 2016 Dec;10(6):1115-1121. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1115. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
5
Predictors of clinical outcome following lumbar disc surgery: the value of historical, physical examination, and muscle function variables.腰椎间盘手术后临床结果的预测因素:病史、体格检查及肌肉功能变量的价值。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):310-317. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3916-z. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
6
Influences of spinal decompression therapy and general traction therapy on the pain, disability, and straight leg raising of patients with intervertebral disc herniation.脊柱减压疗法和一般牵引疗法对椎间盘突出症患者疼痛、功能障碍及直腿抬高的影响。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Feb;27(2):481-3. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.481. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
7
Subgrouping patients with low back pain: a treatment-based approach to classification.将腰痛患者分组:基于治疗的分类方法。
Sports Health. 2011 Nov;3(6):534-42. doi: 10.1177/1941738111415044.
8
Accuracy of spinal orthopaedic tests: a systematic review.脊柱骨科检查的准确性:一项系统评价。
Chiropr Osteopat. 2006 Oct 31;14:26. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-14-26.
9
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy.一项关于颈部激发试验诊断神经根型颈椎病诊断准确性的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):307-19. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0225-6. Epub 2006 Sep 30.
10
Agreement between diagnoses reached by clinical examination and available reference standards: a prospective study of 216 patients with lumbopelvic pain.临床检查得出的诊断结果与现有参考标准之间的一致性:对216例腰骶部疼痛患者的前瞻性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005 Jun 9;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-28.