van den Boogert Thomas P W, Claessen Bimmer E P M, van Randen Adrienne, van Schuppen Joost, Boekholdt S Matthijs, Beijk Marcel A M, Vrijmoeth M Karlijn, Baan Jan, Vis M Marije, Winkelman Jacobus A, Driessen Antoine H G, Stoker Jaap, Planken R Nils, Henriques Jose P
Part of the Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Centre, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, 1815JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
J Clin Med. 2021 May 28;10(11):2374. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112374.
To assess the need for additional invasive coronary angiography (CAG) after initial computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients awaiting non-coronary cardiac surgery and in patients with cardiomyopathy, heart failure or ventricular arrhythmias, and to determine differences between patients that were referred to initial CTCA or direct CAG, consecutive patients were included between August 2017 and January 2020 and categorized as those referred to initial CTCA (conform protocol), and to direct CAG (non-conform protocol). Out of a total of 415 patients, 78.8% (327 patients, mean age: 57.9 years, 67.3% male) were referred to initial CTCA, of whom 260 patients (79.5%) had no obstructive lesions (<50% DS). A total of 55 patients (16.8%) underwent additional CAG after initial CTCA, which showed coronary lesions of >50% DS in 21 patients (6.3% of 327). Eighty-eight patients (mean age: 66.0 years, 59.1% male) were directly referred to CAG (non-conform protocol). These patients were older and had more cardiovascular risk factors compared to patients that underwent initial CTCA (conform protocol), and coronary lesions of >50% DS were detected in 16 patients (17.2%). Revascularization procedures were infrequently performed in both groups: initial CTCA (3.0%), direct CAG (3.4%). The use of CTCA as a gatekeeper CAG in the diagnostic work-up of non-coronary cardiac surgery, cardiomyopathy, heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias is feasible, and only 17% of these patients required additional CAG after initial CTCA. Therefore, CTCA should be considered as the initial imaging modality to rule out CAD in these patients.
为评估等待非心脏冠状动脉手术的患者以及患有心肌病、心力衰竭或室性心律失常的患者在初次计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CTCA)后是否需要额外进行有创冠状动脉造影(CAG),并确定被转诊至初次CTCA或直接进行CAG的患者之间的差异,我们纳入了2017年8月至2020年1月期间的连续患者,并将其分为被转诊至初次CTCA(符合方案)和直接进行CAG(不符合方案)的患者。在总共415例患者中,78.8%(327例患者,平均年龄:57.9岁,67.3%为男性)被转诊至初次CTCA,其中260例患者(79.5%)无阻塞性病变(直径狭窄<50%)。初次CTCA后,共有55例患者(16.8%)接受了额外的CAG,其中21例患者(占327例的6.3%)显示冠状动脉病变直径狭窄>50%。88例患者(平均年龄:66.0岁,59.1%为男性)被直接转诊至CAG(不符合方案)。与接受初次CTCA(符合方案)的患者相比,这些患者年龄更大,心血管危险因素更多,16例患者(17.2%)检测到冠状动脉病变直径狭窄>50%。两组患者很少进行血运重建手术:初次CTCA组(3.0%),直接CAG组(3.4%)。在非心脏冠状动脉手术、心肌病、心力衰竭和室性心律失常的诊断检查中,使用CTCA作为CAG的守门人是可行的,这些患者中只有17%在初次CTCA后需要额外的CAG。因此,在这些患者中,应将CTCA视为排除冠心病的初始成像方式。