Longère Benjamin, Gkizas Christos V, Coisne Augustin, Grenier Lucas, Silvestri Valentina, Pagniez Julien, Simeone Arianna, Hennicaux Justin, Schmidt Michaela, Forman Christoph, Toupin Solenn, Montaigne David, Pontana François
University of Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur Lille, U1011-European Genomic Institute for Diabetes (EGID), F-59000 Lille, France.
CHU Lille, Department of Cardiovascular Radiology, F-59000 Lille, France.
J Clin Med. 2021 May 29;10(11):2417. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112417.
Real-time compressed sensing cine (CS) provides reliable quantification for both ventricles but may alter image quality. The aim of this study was to assess image quality and the accuracy of left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes, ejection fraction and mass quantifications based on a retrogated segmented compressed sensing 2D cine sequence (CS).
Thirty patients were enrolled. Each patient underwent the reference retrogated segmented steady-state free precession cine sequence (SSFP), the real-time CS cine and the segmented retrogated prototype CS sequence providing the same slices. Functional parameters quantification and image quality rating were performed on SSFP and CS images sets. The edge sharpness, which is an estimate of the edge spread function, was assessed for the three sequences.
The mean scan time was: SSFP = 485.4 ± 83.3 (SD) s (95% CI: 454.3-516.5) and CS = 58.3 ± 15.1 (SD) s (95% CI: 53.7-64.2) ( < 0.0001). CS subjective image quality score (median: 4; range: 2-4) was higher than the one provided by CS (median: 3; range: 2-4; = 0.0008) and not different from SSFP overall quality score (median: 4; range: 2-4; = 0.31). CS provided similar LV and RV functional parameters to those assessed with SSFP ( > 0.05). Edge sharpness was significantly better with CS (0.083 ± 0.013 (SD) pixel; 95% CI: 0.078-0.087) than with CS (0.070 ± 0.011 (SD) pixel; 95% CI: 0.066-0.074; = 0.0004) and not different from the reference technique (0.075 ± 0.016 (SD) pixel; 95% CI: 0.069-0.081; = 0.0516).
CS cine provides in one minute an accurate quantification of LV and RV functional parameters without compromising subjective and objective image quality.
实时压缩感知电影成像(CS)可为双心室提供可靠的定量分析,但可能会改变图像质量。本研究的目的是基于回顾性分段压缩感知二维电影序列(CS)评估图像质量以及左心室(LV)和右心室(RV)容积、射血分数和质量定量分析的准确性。
纳入30例患者。每位患者均接受参考回顾性分段稳态自由进动电影序列(SSFP)、实时CS电影成像以及提供相同层面的分段回顾性原型CS序列检查。对SSFP和CS图像集进行功能参数定量分析和图像质量评分。对这三个序列评估边缘锐度,其是边缘扩散函数的一种估计。
平均扫描时间为:SSFP = 485.4 ± 83.3(标准差)秒(95%可信区间:454.3 - 516.5),CS = 58.3 ± 15.1(标准差)秒(95%可信区间:53.7 - 64.2)(< 0.0001)。CS主观图像质量评分(中位数:4;范围:2 - 4)高于CS提供的评分(中位数:3;范围:2 - 4;P = 0.0008),且与SSFP总体质量评分无差异(中位数:4;范围:2 - 4;P = 0.31)。CS提供的LV和RV功能参数与用SSFP评估的结果相似(P > 0.05)。CS的边缘锐度(0.083 ± 0.013(标准差)像素;95%可信区间:0.078 - 0.087)明显优于CS(0.070 ± 0.011(标准差)像素;95%可信区间:0.066 - 0.074;P = 0.0004),且与参考技术无差异(0.075 ± 0.016(标准差)像素;95%可信区间:0.069 - 0.081;P = 0.0516)。
CS电影成像在一分钟内即可准确地对LV和RV功能参数进行定量分析,且不影响主观和客观图像质量。