Ranzato Erica, Tolmie Andrew, Van Herwegen Jo
Department of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, Bloomsbury, London WC1H 0AL, UK.
Brain Sci. 2021 May 31;11(6):733. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060733.
Research on typically developing (TD) populations has shown that the home learning environment plays a significant role in cognitive development and learning, but very little is known about the home learning environment of children with Down syndrome (DS) or children with Williams syndrome (WS). The present study examined and compared, for the first time, the home learning environment of children diagnosed with DS and children diagnosed with WS to investigate whether different cognitive profiles were reflected in their home literacy and number experiences.
Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a web-based survey from 58 parents and one foster parent of primary school children with DS (n = 35) and WS (n = 24) mostly based in the UK. The survey targeted the children's general level of functioning and academic skills; type, format, and frequency of home learning activities; parents' expectations for their child's academic outcomes; parents' attitudes towards literacy and mathematics; children's interest towards mathematics; and the use of technology to support home learning activities.
Our results showed that, overall, the home learning environment of children with DS and children with WS were similar but changed based on the child's cognitive profile. Comparative analyses showed that parents of children with DS engaged more often in activities supporting counting than parents of children with WS, despite both groups reporting difficulties with this skill. Moreover, our results indicated that literacy-based activities occurred more often than mathematics-based activities and that the home numeracy environment was characterized by activities supporting different mathematical skills such as counting, arithmetic, and numeracy. Parents in both groups engaged with their child in both formal and informal literacy and mathematics-based activities, but informal activities occurred more often when supporting counting and number recognition skills. Conclusions and implications The current study provides evidence that the home learning environment of children with DS and children with WS include different literacy- and mathematics-based activities and that the home learning environment changes on the basis of the child's strengths and weaknesses. The findings are discussed in relation to previous studies and the impact on parental interventions.
对正常发育(TD)人群的研究表明,家庭学习环境在认知发展和学习中起着重要作用,但对于唐氏综合征(DS)患儿或威廉姆斯综合征(WS)患儿的家庭学习环境却知之甚少。本研究首次对诊断为DS的儿童和诊断为WS的儿童的家庭学习环境进行了考察和比较,以探究不同的认知特征是否体现在他们的家庭读写和数字体验中。
通过网络调查,从58位家长和1位寄养家长那里收集了定量和定性数据,这些家长主要来自英国,他们的孩子患有DS(n = 35)或WS(n = 24),均为小学生。该调查针对儿童的总体功能水平和学术技能;家庭学习活动的类型、形式和频率;家长对孩子学业成绩的期望;家长对读写和数学的态度;孩子对数学的兴趣;以及使用技术支持家庭学习活动的情况。
我们的结果表明,总体而言,DS患儿和WS患儿的家庭学习环境相似,但会根据孩子的认知特征而变化。比较分析表明,尽管两组家长都表示在这项技能上有困难,但DS患儿的家长比WS患儿的家长更频繁地参与支持计数的活动。此外,我们的结果表明,以读写为基础的活动比以数学为基础的活动更频繁,并且家庭数字环境的特点是支持不同数学技能(如计数、算术和数字运算)的活动。两组家长都与孩子一起参与正式和非正式的基于读写和数学的活动,但在支持计数和数字识别技能时,非正式活动更频繁。结论与启示:当前研究提供了证据,表明DS患儿和WS患儿的家庭学习环境包括不同的基于读写和数学的活动,并且家庭学习环境会根据孩子的优势和劣势而变化。将结合先前的研究对这些发现进行讨论以及其对家长干预的影响。