• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者及公众对英国癌症研究中心关于新冠疫情对其临床研究项目影响评估的贡献价值。

The value of the patient and public contribution to cancer research UK's review of covid-19 impact on its clinical research portfolio.

作者信息

Croudass Anne, Stephens Richard

机构信息

CRUK Lead Research Nurse, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK.

Patient and Public Representative, 18 Russell Close, Stevenage, PB, SG2 8, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 1;7(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00279-w.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-021-00279-w
PMID:34074346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8169392/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In July 2020 Cancer Research UK undertook a rapid review of the studies in its clinical research portfolio to assess the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. The review examined over 160 research studies funded by the charity, and in keeping with its usual practice, the charity involved patient/public contributors in the review process.

MAIN BODY

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) spends over £450 million pa on research, including clinical trials, tissue collections, laboratory science and biomarker studies. It has involved patient/public contributors in clinical research funding decisions for ten years, recruiting volunteers from the National Cancer Research Institute's (NCRI) Consumer Forum. The NCRI is a partnership of funders, including the 4 UK governments and major charities such as CRUK. Its Consumer Forum is a group of volunteers with personal experience of cancer as patients or carers, who are trained for and experienced in working on national strategic bodies as well as on individual research studies. The CRUK whole-portfolio review was held over a two-week period in a series of online meetings. A pair from the team of patient/public contributors was included in each meeting, and they made comments on every application reviewed as well as participating in reaching decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

The process not only demonstrated CRUK's continued commitment to involving patient/public contributors in their funding decisions, but also provided an opportunity for these contributors to take a holistic view of processes to inform future patient/public contribution in the charity's work, as well as to influence the decisions about the individual studies being reviewed.

摘要

背景

2020年7月,英国癌症研究中心对其临床研究项目中的研究进行了快速审查,以评估新冠疫情的影响。该审查研究了该慈善机构资助的160多项研究,并且按照惯例,该慈善机构让患者/公众参与了审查过程。

主体内容

英国癌症研究中心(CRUK)每年在研究上的花费超过4.5亿英镑,包括临床试验、组织收集、实验室科学和生物标志物研究。十年来,它一直让患者/公众参与临床研究资金决策,从国家癌症研究所(NCRI)的消费者论坛招募志愿者。NCRI是一个资助者联盟,包括英国的四个政府以及CRUK等主要慈善机构。其消费者论坛是一群有癌症患者或护理人员亲身经历的志愿者,他们在参与国家战略机构以及个别研究方面接受过培训并富有经验。CRUK的整个项目审查在一系列为期两周的在线会议中进行。每次会议都有一对患者/公众参与团队的成员参加,他们对审查的每个申请发表意见,并参与决策。

结论

该过程不仅展示了CRUK在资金决策中持续让患者/公众参与的承诺,还为这些参与者提供了一个全面了解相关流程的机会,以便为该慈善机构未来的患者/公众参与提供信息,同时影响正在审查的个别研究的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007b/8170740/b9c66d745892/40900_2021_279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007b/8170740/b9c66d745892/40900_2021_279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007b/8170740/b9c66d745892/40900_2021_279_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The value of the patient and public contribution to cancer research UK's review of covid-19 impact on its clinical research portfolio.患者及公众对英国癌症研究中心关于新冠疫情对其临床研究项目影响评估的贡献价值。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 1;7(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00279-w.
2
Conducting retrospective impact analysis to inform a medical research charity's funding strategies: the case of Asthma UK.开展回顾性影响分析,为医学研究慈善机构的资助策略提供信息:以英国哮喘协会为例。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 May 7;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-17.
3
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
4
5
Regional working in the East of England: using the UK National Standards for Public Involvement.英格兰东部的区域工作:采用英国公众参与国家标准。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 6;4:48. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0130-2. eCollection 2018.
6
Patient and public involvement prior to trial initiation: lessons learnt for rapid partnership in the COVID-19 era.试验启动前的患者及公众参与:新冠疫情时代快速建立伙伴关系的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 8;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00250-9.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Challenges and adaptations to public involvement with marginalised groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: commentary with illustrative case studies in the context of patient safety research.新冠疫情期间公共参与与边缘化群体面临的挑战及适应策略:结合患者安全研究中的实例进行评论
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Apr 11;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00345-x.
9
10
Insights on conducting digital patient and public involvement in dementia research during the COVID-19 pandemic: supporting the development of an "E-nabling digital co-production" framework.关于在新冠疫情期间开展数字患者及公众参与痴呆症研究的见解:支持“电子赋能数字共同生产”框架的发展
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jul 26;8(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00371-9.