• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于在新冠疫情期间开展数字患者及公众参与痴呆症研究的见解:支持“电子赋能数字共同生产”框架的发展

Insights on conducting digital patient and public involvement in dementia research during the COVID-19 pandemic: supporting the development of an "E-nabling digital co-production" framework.

作者信息

Molinari-Ulate Mauricio, Woodcock Rebecca, Smith Isabelle, van der Roest Henriëtte G, Franco-Martín Manuel A, Craven Michael P

机构信息

Psycho-Sciences Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Department of Research and Development, Iberian Institute of Research in Psycho-Sciences, INTRAS Foundation, Zamora, Spain.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jul 26;8(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00371-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-022-00371-9
PMID:35883132
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9321274/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rapid transition to digital working, accelerated due to the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, has impacted the involvement of patients and public in research. This paper presents experiences of engaging in digital Patient and Public Involvement (e-PPI) in dementia research since the lockdowns, offering recommendations regarding future digital and hybrid working. Furthermore, it introduces a co-produced framework for researchers, PPI coordinators and public contributors to identify and discuss challenges and opportunities provided by e-PPI.

METHODS

Two online workshops and one individual interview were performed with a group of researchers and PPI coordinators with experience in PPI in dementia research, and with an existing dementia PPI group having some experience of working online during the pandemic. The project was constructed as a PPI activity, with the MindTech Involvement Team (PPI group) involved in the entire process, and a collaborative data analysis process was adopted.

RESULTS

After refinement of the coding structure, the MindTech Involvement Team and Project Leaders identified four main themes, resulting in the 'E-nabling Digital Co-production' Framework. During this framework development, different positions were expressed, associated with the transition to digital working. Two main themes were shared by the participating groups regarding e-PPI: wider potential reach without geographical constraints, and the perception of more business-like sessions with reduced opportunities for social interactions and communication. Specifically for dementia research, whilst e-PPI may allow public contributors to attend more meetings, potentially mutually supportive environments provided by face-to-face meetings could be diminished, with carers experiencing a possible reduction in informal respite opportunities.

CONCLUSIONS

Through involving public contributors, researchers, and PPI coordinators with a focus on digital PPI in dementia research, we were able to further refine and co-produce the 'E-nabling Digital Co-production' Framework. Demonstrating potential for analysis of benefits and limitations within e-PPI, it was possible to identify both general insights and those specific to dementia research. However, the most significant contribution of the framework is the potential to support local journeys of co-production in ongoing digital and hybrid public involvement activities.

摘要

背景

由于对新冠疫情的应对,向数字工作的快速转变加速,这对患者和公众参与研究产生了影响。本文介绍了自封锁以来在痴呆症研究中开展数字患者和公众参与(e-PPI)的经验,就未来的数字和混合工作提供了建议。此外,它还为研究人员、PPI协调员和公众贡献者引入了一个共同制定的框架,以识别和讨论e-PPI带来的挑战和机遇。

方法

对一组在痴呆症研究中具有PPI经验的研究人员和PPI协调员,以及一个在疫情期间有在线工作经验的现有痴呆症PPI小组进行了两次在线研讨会和一次个人访谈。该项目被构建为一项PPI活动,MindTech参与团队(PPI小组)参与了整个过程,并采用了协作式数据分析过程。

结果

在完善编码结构后,MindTech参与团队和项目负责人确定了四个主要主题,形成了“实现数字共同生产”框架。在这个框架的开发过程中,表达了与向数字工作转变相关的不同立场。参与小组就e-PPI分享了两个主要主题:不受地理限制的更广泛潜在覆盖范围,以及对会议更具商业氛围的看法,社交互动和交流机会减少。具体到痴呆症研究,虽然e-PPI可能使公众贡献者能够参加更多会议,但面对面会议可能提供的相互支持环境可能会减少,照顾者的非正式喘息机会可能会减少。

结论

通过让公众贡献者、研究人员和PPI协调员参与,专注于痴呆症研究中的数字PPI,我们能够进一步完善并共同制定“实现数字共同生产”框架。展示了分析e-PPI中利弊的潜力,既可以确定一般见解,也可以确定特定于痴呆症研究的见解。然而,该框架最重要的贡献在于有可能支持正在进行的数字和混合式公众参与活动中的本地共同生产进程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9122/9327375/1180be0dcc72/40900_2022_371_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9122/9327375/bea6930eb9a3/40900_2022_371_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9122/9327375/ef86afa8b90b/40900_2022_371_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9122/9327375/1180be0dcc72/40900_2022_371_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9122/9327375/bea6930eb9a3/40900_2022_371_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9122/9327375/ef86afa8b90b/40900_2022_371_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9122/9327375/1180be0dcc72/40900_2022_371_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Insights on conducting digital patient and public involvement in dementia research during the COVID-19 pandemic: supporting the development of an "E-nabling digital co-production" framework.关于在新冠疫情期间开展数字患者及公众参与痴呆症研究的见解:支持“电子赋能数字共同生产”框架的发展
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jul 26;8(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00371-9.
2
Challenges and adaptations to public involvement with marginalised groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: commentary with illustrative case studies in the context of patient safety research.新冠疫情期间公共参与与边缘化群体面临的挑战及适应策略:结合患者安全研究中的实例进行评论
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Apr 11;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00345-x.
3
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
4
What has the COVID-19 pandemic taught us about conducting patient and public involvement remotely? Insights from a series of digital meeting observations.关于远程开展患者和公众参与,新冠疫情给了我们哪些启示?来自一系列数字会议观察的见解。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 11;7(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00315-9.
5
Remote working in public involvement: findings from a mixed methods study.公众参与中的远程工作:一项混合方法研究的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 4;8(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00396-0.
6
Regional working in the East of England: using the UK National Standards for Public Involvement.英格兰东部的区域工作:采用英国公众参与国家标准。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 6;4:48. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0130-2. eCollection 2018.
7
Using the UK standards for public involvement to evaluate the public involvement sections of annual reports from NIHR managed research centres.使用英国公众参与标准来评估英国国家卫生研究院管理的研究中心年度报告中的公众参与部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 30;9(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00517-3.
8
Digital participatory workshops with patients and health professionals to develop an intervention for the management of polypharmacy: results from a mixed-methods evaluation and methodological conclusions.与患者和医疗专业人员开展数字参与式研讨会以制定多药治疗管理干预措施:混合方法评估结果及方法学结论
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 16;8(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00387-1.
9
Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: reflections and experiences of the PPI contributors and researcher.患者及公众参与博士研究:PPI参与者与研究者的思考及经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 May 11;6:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00201-w. eCollection 2020.
10
Co-designing new tools for collecting, analysing and presenting patient experience data in NHS services: working in partnership with patients and carers.共同设计用于收集、分析和呈现英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)服务中患者体验数据的新工具:与患者及护理人员合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Nov 27;7(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00329-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience, Process, and Impact of Involving Informal Caregivers of People With Dementia as Public Contributors to Inform the Development of a Complex Intervention: A Mixed-Methods Study.让痴呆症患者的非正式照料者作为公众参与者参与复杂干预措施开发的经验、过程及影响:一项混合方法研究
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70382. doi: 10.1111/hex.70382.
2
Meaningful patient and public engagement in dissemination-embedding co-production in dementia research.患者和公众有意义地参与痴呆症研究中传播-嵌入联合生产。
Front Dement. 2024 Sep 16;3:1426019. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1426019. eCollection 2024.
3
Determinants of Successful Implementation of Assistive Technologies for Dementia: Exploratory Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Approaches Adopted by Researchers to Measure the Quality of the Experience of People Working from Home: a Scoping Review.研究人员用于衡量在家工作人员体验质量的方法:一项范围综述
J Technol Behav Sci. 2022;7(4):451-467. doi: 10.1007/s41347-022-00264-4. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
2
What has the COVID-19 pandemic taught us about conducting patient and public involvement remotely? Insights from a series of digital meeting observations.关于远程开展患者和公众参与,新冠疫情给了我们哪些启示?来自一系列数字会议观察的见解。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 11;7(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00315-9.
3
A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership.
辅助技术在痴呆症中的成功实施的决定因素:探索性调查。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Sep 13;7:e53640. doi: 10.2196/53640.
4
Sustaining connections: feasibility and impact of long-term virtual patient engagement.维持联系:长期虚拟患者参与的可行性与影响
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 24;10(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00558-2.
5
The Perspective of Nurses and Healthcare Providers on the use of Television Videos with People with Moderate to Severe Dementia.护士和医疗保健提供者对使用电视视频与中重度痴呆症患者的看法。
Can J Nurs Res. 2024 Mar;56(1):49-60. doi: 10.1177/08445621231208220. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
6
Adapting Patient and Public Involvement processes in response to the Covid-19 pandemic.适应患者和公众参与流程以应对新冠疫情。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1658-1667. doi: 10.1111/hex.13771. Epub 2023 May 1.
一项关于 COVID-19 期间患者参与活动的范围综述:更多的咨询,更少的合作。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 29;16(9):e0257880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257880. eCollection 2021.
4
Editorial: Public Participation in Health Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge.社论:公众参与医疗保健:探索知识的共同生产
Front Sociol. 2019 Nov 12;4:73. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00073. eCollection 2019.
5
Health information professionals: delivering core services and value in extraordinary times.卫生信息专业人员:在特殊时期提供核心服务和价值。
Health Info Libr J. 2020 Sep;37(3):245-247. doi: 10.1111/hir.12319. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
6
The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行与卫生不平等。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov;74(11):964-968. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214401. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
7
Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production.迷失在阴影中:关于共同生产阴暗面的思考
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 7;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0.
8
Patient and public involvement in dementia research in the European Union: a scoping review.患者和公众参与欧盟的痴呆症研究:范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1217-9.
9
Planning and enabling meaningful patient and public involvement in dementia research.规划和促进痴呆症研究中患者和公众的有意义参与。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;32(6):557-562. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000548.
10
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.