关于姑息治疗和在线期刊中沟通的科学文献产出：范围综述。
Scientific production about palliative care and communication in online journals: a scoping review.
机构信息
Universidade Federal da Paraíba. João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Alfenas. Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
出版信息
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 May 28;74(2):e20190378. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0378. eCollection 2021.
OBJECTIVES
to characterize publications about palliative care and communication, with an emphasis on the approaches addressed, disseminated in online journals.
METHODS
it is a scope review, in which the mnemonic strategy Problem, Concept and Context was used, based on database research. The sample consisted of 86 publications.
RESULTS
most publications were written in the English language, published in the journal BMC Palliative Care, and with level of evidence IV. As for the approaches approached, the following stand out: Importance of communication in palliative care; Breaking the bad news in palliative care; Training professionals/staff to communicate in palliative care; and Communication strategies in palliative care.
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
the review made it possible to map a significant number of publications on palliative care and communication. It is recommended to produce new studies with better scientific evidence that guide the assistance of health professionals.
目的
描述以姑息治疗和沟通为重点的出版物，强调在线期刊中发表的方法。
方法
这是一项范围审查，使用了记忆策略问题、概念和背景，基于数据库研究。样本由 86 篇出版物组成。
结果
大多数出版物都是用英语写的，发表在 BMC 姑息治疗杂志上，证据水平为 IV。至于所涉及的方法，以下几点值得关注：姑息治疗中沟通的重要性；在姑息治疗中告知坏消息；培训专业人员/员工进行姑息治疗沟通；以及姑息治疗中的沟通策略。
最终考虑
该综述使我们能够绘制出大量关于姑息治疗和沟通的出版物。建议开展新的研究，以更好的科学证据来指导卫生专业人员的援助。
Zotero 插件