Suppr超能文献

五点总最大位移与全部点评估胫骨基板稳定性的比较。

Maximum Total Point Motion of Five Points Versus All Points in Assessing Tibial Baseplate Stability.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA 95817.

出版信息

J Biomech Eng. 2021 Nov 1;143(11). doi: 10.1115/1.4051347.

Abstract

Maximum total point motion (MTPM), the point on a baseplate that migrates the most, has been used to assess the risk of tibial baseplate loosening using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Two methods for determining MTPM for model-based RSA are to use either five points distributed around the perimeter of the baseplate or to use all points on the three-dimensional model. The objectives were to quantify the mean difference in MTPM using five points versus all points, compute the percent error relative to the 6-month stability limit for groups of patients, and determine the dependency of differences in MTPM on baseplate size and shape. A dataset of 10,000 migration values was generated using the mean and standard deviation of migration in six-degrees-of-freedom at 6 months from an RSA study. The dataset was used to simulate the migration of three-dimensional models (two baseplate shapes and two baseplate sizes) and calculate the difference in MTPM using five virtual points versus all points and the percent error (i.e., the difference in MTPM/stability limit) relative to the 6-month stability limit. The difference in the MTPM was about 0.02 mm, or 4% relative to the 6-month stability limit, which is not clinically important. Furthermore, results were not affected by baseplate shape or size. Researchers can decide whether to use five points or all points when computing MTPM for model-based RSA. The authors recommend using five points to maintain consistency with marker-based RSA.

摘要

最大总点运动(MTPM),即基台表面上移动幅度最大的点,已被用于使用放射学体层分析(RSA)评估胫骨基台松动的风险。用于基于模型 RSA 的确定 MTPM 的两种方法是使用基台周围分布的五个点或使用三维模型上的所有点。目的是定量比较使用五个点和所有点确定 MTPM 的平均差异,计算相对于 6 个月稳定性极限的组间相对误差,并确定 MTPM 差异对基台大小和形状的依赖性。通过对 RSA 研究中 6 自由度 6 个月的迁移数据进行平均和标准偏差,生成了 10000 个迁移值数据集。使用该数据集模拟了三维模型的迁移,并计算了使用五个虚拟点和所有点确定 MTPM 的差异以及相对于 6 个月稳定性极限的相对误差(即 MTPM 差异/稳定性极限)。MTPM 的差异约为 0.02mm,或相对于 6 个月稳定性极限的 4%,这在临床上并不重要。此外,结果不受基台形状或大小的影响。研究人员可以决定在计算基于模型的 RSA 的 MTPM 时使用五个点还是所有点。作者建议使用五个点以保持与基于标记的 RSA 的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验