• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层聚类基于结果的抽样设计中的最优分配。

Optimal allocation in stratified cluster-based outcome-dependent sampling designs.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2021 Aug 15;40(18):4090-4107. doi: 10.1002/sim.9016. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1002/sim.9016
PMID:34076912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8812629/
Abstract

In public health research, finite resources often require that decisions be made at the study design stage regarding which individuals to sample for detailed data collection. At the same time, when study units are naturally clustered, as patients are in clinics, it may be preferable to sample clusters rather than the study units, especially when the costs associated with travel between clusters are high. In this setting, aggregated data on the outcome and select covariates are sometimes routinely available through, for example, a country's Health Management Information System. If used wisely, this information can be used to guide decisions regarding which clusters to sample, and potentially obtain gains in efficiency over simple random sampling. In this article, we derive a series of formulas for optimal allocation of resources when a single-stage stratified cluster-based outcome-dependent sampling design is to be used and a marginal mean model is specified to answer the question of interest. Specifically, we consider two settings: (i) when a particular parameter in the mean model is of primary interest; and, (ii) when multiple parameters are of interest. We investigate the finite population performance of the optimal allocation framework through a comprehensive simulation study. Our results show that there are trade-offs that must be considered at the design stage: optimizing for one parameter yields efficiency gains over balanced and simple random sampling, while resulting in losses for the other parameters in the model. Optimizing for all parameters simultaneously yields smaller gains in efficiency, but mitigates the losses for the other parameters in the model.

摘要

在公共卫生研究中,由于资源有限,通常需要在研究设计阶段做出决策,决定对哪些个体进行详细数据收集抽样。与此同时,当研究单位自然聚集时,如在诊所中的患者,对聚类进行抽样可能比对研究单位进行抽样更为可取,尤其是当集群之间的旅行成本较高时。在这种情况下,通过国家健康管理信息系统等方式,通常可以获得有关结局和选择协变量的汇总数据。如果明智地使用这些信息,可以用于指导关于对哪些聚类进行抽样的决策,并有可能获得相对于简单随机抽样的效率提高。在本文中,我们推导了当使用单阶段分层基于结果的聚类依赖抽样设计时资源最优分配的一系列公式,并指定了边缘均值模型来回答感兴趣的问题。具体来说,我们考虑了两种情况:(i)当均值模型中的特定参数是主要关注点时;和,(ii)当多个参数都感兴趣时。我们通过全面的模拟研究来研究最优分配框架的有限总体性能。我们的结果表明,在设计阶段必须考虑到权衡取舍:对一个参数进行优化会提高效率,超过平衡和简单随机抽样,同时对模型中的其他参数造成损失。同时优化所有参数会带来较小的效率提高,但会减轻模型中其他参数的损失。

相似文献

1
Optimal allocation in stratified cluster-based outcome-dependent sampling designs.分层聚类基于结果的抽样设计中的最优分配。
Stat Med. 2021 Aug 15;40(18):4090-4107. doi: 10.1002/sim.9016. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
2
Optimal sampling allocation for outcome-dependent designs in cluster-correlated data settings.在聚类相关数据环境下,基于结局相关设计的最优抽样分配。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Dec;31(12):2400-2414. doi: 10.1177/09622802221122423. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
3
Practical strategies for operationalizing optimal allocation in stratified cluster-based outcome-dependent sampling designs.实用策略:在基于分层群集的结果依赖抽样设计中实现最佳分配。
Stat Med. 2023 Mar 30;42(7):917-935. doi: 10.1002/sim.9650. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
Optimal two-stage sampling for mean estimation in multilevel populations when cluster size is informative.多水平总体中当群大小为信息性时的均值估计的最优两阶段抽样。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):357-375. doi: 10.1177/0962280220952833. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
On the Analysis of Case-Control Studies in Cluster-correlated Data Settings.在群组相关数据环境下的病例对照研究分析。
Epidemiology. 2018 Jan;29(1):50-57. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000763.
6
On the analysis of two-phase designs in cluster-correlated data settings.在群组相关数据环境下的两阶段设计分析。
Stat Med. 2019 Oct 15;38(23):4611-4624. doi: 10.1002/sim.8321. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Optimal sampling for design-based estimators of regression models.基于设计的回归模型估计量的最优抽样。
Stat Med. 2022 Apr 15;41(8):1482-1497. doi: 10.1002/sim.9300. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
8
Bayesian inference under cluster sampling with probability proportional to size.基于大小与概率成比例的聚类抽样的贝叶斯推断。
Stat Med. 2018 Nov 20;37(26):3849-3868. doi: 10.1002/sim.7892. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
9
Cost-efficient case-control cluster sampling designs for population-based epidemiological studies.用于基于人群的流行病学研究的具有成本效益的病例对照整群抽样设计。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;26:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
10
When should matching be used in the design of cluster randomized trials?在群组随机试验设计中何时应该使用匹配?
Stat Med. 2021 Nov 20;40(26):5765-5778. doi: 10.1002/sim.9152. Epub 2021 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical strategies for operationalizing optimal allocation in stratified cluster-based outcome-dependent sampling designs.实用策略:在基于分层群集的结果依赖抽样设计中实现最佳分配。
Stat Med. 2023 Mar 30;42(7):917-935. doi: 10.1002/sim.9650. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
2
Optimal sampling allocation for outcome-dependent designs in cluster-correlated data settings.在聚类相关数据环境下,基于结局相关设计的最优抽样分配。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Dec;31(12):2400-2414. doi: 10.1177/09622802221122423. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal Designs of Two-Phase Studies.两阶段研究的最优设计
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(532):1946-1959. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1671200. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
2
Small-sample inference for cluster-based outcome-dependent sampling schemes in resource-limited settings: Investigating low birthweight in Rwanda.在资源有限的情况下,基于群组的结果依赖抽样方案的小样本推断:以卢旺达的低出生体重为例。
Biometrics. 2022 Jun;78(2):701-715. doi: 10.1111/biom.13423. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Two-wave two-phase outcome-dependent sampling designs, with applications to longitudinal binary data.
两波两阶段基于结果的抽样设计及其在纵向二分类数据中的应用。
Stat Med. 2021 Apr 15;40(8):1863-1876. doi: 10.1002/sim.8876. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Two-phase analysis and study design for survival models with error-prone exposures.具有易出错暴露因素的生存模型的两阶段分析与研究设计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Dec 16:962280220978500. doi: 10.1177/0962280220978500.
5
Selection models for efficient two-phase design of family studies.用于家系研究高效两阶段设计的选择模型。
Stat Med. 2021 Jan 30;40(2):254-270. doi: 10.1002/sim.8772. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
6
Optimal multiwave sampling for regression modeling in two-phase designs.两阶段设计中回归建模的最优多波抽样
Stat Med. 2020 Dec 30;39(30):4912-4921. doi: 10.1002/sim.8760. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar.估计胎龄的误差降低了在医疗机构分娩的可能性:来自桑给巴尔的一项观察性队列研究结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 20;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4904-5.
8
Two-Phase, Generalized Case-Control Designs for the Study of Quantitative Longitudinal Outcomes.两阶段广义病例对照设计在定量纵向结局研究中的应用。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 28;189(2):81-90. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz127.
9
Extending the Case-Control Design to Longitudinal Data: Stratified Sampling Based on Repeated Binary Outcomes.将病例对照设计扩展到纵向数据:基于重复二分类结局的分层抽样。
Epidemiology. 2018 Jan;29(1):67-75. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000764.
10
District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a systematic literature review.低收入环境下的地区卫生决策:一项系统的文献综述
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep;31 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii12-ii24. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv124.