• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

元认知愤怒处理量表(MAP-SV)简表——初步心理测量测试。

The Short Version of the Metacognitive Anger Processing Scale (MAP-SV) - initial psychometric testing.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark.

出版信息

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2022 Jan;50(1):117-121. doi: 10.1017/S1352465821000199. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1017/S1352465821000199
PMID:34078508
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 26-item version of the Metacognitive Anger Processing Scale (MAP) has shown good psychometric properties in previous studies. However, there is a need for a shorter version of the scale.

AIMS

The aim of the present study is to psychometrically evaluate the 9-item Metacognitive Anger Processing Scale - Short Version (MAP-SV) in comparison with the original, 26-item version.

METHOD

The 26-item MAP includes three subscales: rumination, positive beliefs and negative beliefs. Three items from each subscale were selected based on clinical validity to constitute the 9-item MAP-SV. A previous sample used for validation of the 26-item MAP was used for clinimetric testing. The sample included psychiatric patients (n = 88) and male forensic inpatients (n = 54). The MAP-SV was assessed according to scalability, convergent validity with general metacognition, and concurrent validity with anger measures.

RESULTS

The scalability of the 9-item MAP-SV was comparable to that of the original 26-item MAP in most psychometric tests. The Loevinger's coefficient of homogeneity for the total score of the MAP-SV items was 0.29 for the combined sample compared with 0.36 in the original MAP, indicating close to acceptable scalability. The alpha coefficient for the MAP-SV total score was 0.79. For the combined sample, Pearson inter-correlations between the subscales of the MAP-SV were highly correlated with the MAP-SV total score (ranging from .66 to .84).

CONCLUSIONS

The 9-item MAP-SV showed good psychometric properties and can be used as a reliable tool for assessing self-reported metacognitive anger processing.

摘要

背景

26 项版本的元认知愤怒处理量表(MAP)在先前的研究中表现出了良好的心理测量特性。然而,我们需要一个更简短的版本。

目的

本研究旨在心理测量评估 9 项元认知愤怒处理量表-短版(MAP-SV)与原始的 26 项版本的区别。

方法

26 项 MAP 包括三个分量表:反刍、积极信念和消极信念。根据临床有效性从每个分量表中选择三个项目,构成 9 项 MAP-SV。一个用于验证 26 项 MAP 的先前样本被用于临床测试。该样本包括精神科患者(n=88)和男性法医住院患者(n=54)。根据可扩展性、与一般元认知的收敛效度以及与愤怒测量的同时效度来评估 MAP-SV。

结果

在大多数心理测量测试中,9 项 MAP-SV 的可扩展性与原始的 26 项 MAP 相当。MAP-SV 项目总分的 Loevinger 同质性系数在合并样本中为 0.29,而原始 MAP 中为 0.36,表明接近可接受的可扩展性。MAP-SV 总分的 alpha 系数为 0.79。对于合并样本,MAP-SV 各分量表之间的 Pearson 相关系数与 MAP-SV 总分高度相关(范围从 0.66 到 0.84)。

结论

9 项 MAP-SV 表现出良好的心理测量特性,可以作为评估自我报告的元认知愤怒处理的可靠工具。

相似文献

1
The Short Version of the Metacognitive Anger Processing Scale (MAP-SV) - initial psychometric testing.元认知愤怒处理量表(MAP-SV)简表——初步心理测量测试。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2022 Jan;50(1):117-121. doi: 10.1017/S1352465821000199. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
2
The Metacognitive Anger Processing (MAP) Scale: Preliminary Testing.元认知愤怒处理(MAP)量表:初步测试
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2016 Jul;44(4):504-9. doi: 10.1017/S1352465815000272. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
3
The Metacognitive Anger Processing (MAP) Scale - Validation in a Mixed Clinical and a Forensic In-Patient Sample.元认知愤怒处理(MAP)量表——在混合临床和法医住院样本中的验证
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Jan;47(1):67-80. doi: 10.1017/S1352465818000140. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
4
[Psychometric approach of metacognition: Pilot study in clinical population].[元认知的心理测量方法:临床人群的初步研究]
Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
Metacognitive beliefs in depressed in-patients: adaptation and validation of the short version of the Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30) for French clinical and non-clinical samples.抑郁住院患者的元认知信念:短版元认知问卷(MCQ-30)在法国临床和非临床样本中的适应和验证。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2020 Jul;48(4):498-502. doi: 10.1017/S1352465820000065. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
6
Assessing metacognitive and help-seeking strategies in schizophrenia: design and psychometric validation of the Versailles Metacognitive Strategies Evaluation Questionnaire.评估精神分裂症的元认知和寻求帮助策略:凡尔赛元认知策略评估问卷的设计和心理计量学验证。
Clin Rehabil. 2020 Feb;34(2):263-275. doi: 10.1177/0269215519888784. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
7
Validation of the French version of the « Meta-Cognition Questionnaire » for adolescents (MCQ-Af): Evolution of metacognitive beliefs with age and their links with anxiety during adolescence.青少年元认知问卷(MCQ-Af)法译本的验证:元认知信念随年龄的变化及其与青少年焦虑的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0230171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230171. eCollection 2020.
8
The psychometric properties of positive and negative beliefs about the rumination scale in Chinese undergraduates.正、负思维反刍量表在中国大学生群体中的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Apr 11;11(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01111-8.
9
Metacognitive self-assessment scale: psychometric properties and clinical implications.元认知自我评估量表:心理测量特性及临床意义。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Sep-Oct;28(5):596-606. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1671843. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
Metacognitive beliefs and rumination as predictors of anger: A prospective study.元认知信念和沉思作为愤怒的预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Aggress Behav. 2017 Sep;43(5):421-429. doi: 10.1002/ab.21699. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression: study protocol for a parallel group randomized clinical trial (DEPRE-ST).方案治疗与常规治疗对治疗困难的门诊抑郁症患者的比较:一项平行组随机临床试验(DEPRE-ST)的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Apr 16;25(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08079-9.