Manojlović Denisa, Kozinc Žiga, Šarabon Nejc
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Izola, Slovenia.
Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Izola, Slovenia.
J Pain Res. 2021 May 26;14:1431-1449. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S301448. eCollection 2021.
Previous research suggests that muscle strength exercise is the most effective rehabilitation methods in patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). This systematic review with meta-analysis compared the effects of Hip&Knee, Hip-only and Knee-only exercise programs on pain relief, muscle strength, and functional performance in patients with PFP.
Literature searches of PubMed, PEDro and CINAHL databases revealed twenty-one studies included in the final descriptive review, thirteen of which were included in the meta-analysis. Data extraction included baseline and post-intervention means and standard deviations of all eligible outcome measures both for the intervention and control groups, participants baseline demographics and intervention characteristics.
The results showed that Hip&Knee and Hip-only exercise programs were comparatively effective, while the Knee-only exercise programs proved to be inferior to the above-mentioned approaches. The Hip&Knee exercise programs showed the greatest pain relief (mean difference = -1.71 (-3.11, -0.30); p = 0.02; I = 96%) and functional improvement (standardized mean difference = 1.28 (0.45, 2.12); p = 0.003; I = 84%), although the subgroup analysis did not show any significant difference compared to Hip-only exercise programs (p > 0.05).
Overall, Hip&Knee exercise programs appear to reduce pain and improve function more than other exercise programs and could be used as a primary rehabilitation approach in patients with PFP. However, the difference between the subgroups in most outcome measures suggests that Hip&Knee exercise programs are no more effective than Hip-only exercise programs.
先前的研究表明,力量训练是髌股关节疼痛(PFP)患者最有效的康复方法。本系统评价及荟萃分析比较了髋膝联合、单纯髋部和单纯膝部锻炼方案对PFP患者疼痛缓解、肌肉力量和功能表现的影响。
对PubMed、PEDro和CINAHL数据库进行文献检索,最终描述性综述纳入21项研究,其中13项纳入荟萃分析。数据提取包括干预组和对照组所有合格结局指标的基线及干预后的均值和标准差、参与者的基线人口统计学数据和干预特征。
结果显示,髋膝联合和单纯髋部锻炼方案效果相对较好,而单纯膝部锻炼方案被证明不如上述方法。髋膝联合锻炼方案显示出最大程度的疼痛缓解(平均差值=-1.71(-3.11,-0.30);p=0.02;I²=96%)和功能改善(标准化平均差值=1.28(0.45,2.12);p=0.003;I²=84%),尽管亚组分析显示与单纯髋部锻炼方案相比无显著差异(p>0.05)。
总体而言,髋膝联合锻炼方案似乎比其他锻炼方案更能减轻疼痛和改善功能,可作为PFP患者的主要康复方法。然而,大多数结局指标亚组之间的差异表明,髋膝联合锻炼方案并不比单纯髋部锻炼方案更有效。