Qi Ying, Wang Xiaoming, Mao Jian
Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Department of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Jun;11(6):2321-2332. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-1040.
Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns represent approximately 10% of births worldwide and 45% of births in some countries. It has been suggested that SGA might cause learning difficulties and behavioral abnormalities in childhood, yet the neurobiological basis for this is poorly understood. In this study, we employed several advanced imaging techniques-including T2-relaxation-under-spin-tagging (TRUST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and phase-contrast (PC) MRI-to quantify oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), global cerebral blood flow (CBF), and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO) to elucidate pathophysiological vulnerabilities of SGA neonates.
A total of 41 newborns were enrolled in this study, consisting of 29 SGA and 12 appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) neonates. The SGA group was further divided into subgroups with and without abnormalities on structural MRI, denoted as SGA-a (N=17) and SGA-n (N=12). TRUST and PC MRI were performed to determine OEF, CBF, and CMRO. Linear regression analyses were performed to examine physiological parameters' dependence on scan age, gender, and group. Similar analyses were conducted for birth weight and brain volume. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to test physiological parameters' ability to different diagnostic groups.
Regression analysis revealed that CMRO was significantly lower (P=0.04) in the SGA group relative to the AGA group. When further stratifying the SGA participants into SGA-a and SGA-n subgroups, the SGA-a subgroup was found to have the most pronounced physiological deficits, with a lower CMRO (P=0.004) and lower CBF (P=0.007) than those in the AGA group. Conversely, CMRO (P=0.40) and CBF (P=0.90) in the SGA-n subgroup were not different from those of the AGA group. Accordingly, CBF in the SGA-a group was significantly lower (P=0.01) than that of the SGA-n group and CMRO2 also showed a difference (P=0.09). Additionally, CMRO (P=0.002) and CBF (P=0.04) showed an age-related increase during this early developmental period. In analyzing the SGA-a subgroup relative to the remaining neonates, the area under curve (AUC) values were 0.6, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.5 for birth weight, OEF, CMRO, CBF, and brain volume, respectively. In analyzing the SGA-a subgroup relative to the SGA-n subgroup, AUC values were 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.5 for birth weight, OEF, CMRO, CBF, and brain volume.
Structural damage in SGA-a neonates is associated with cerebral hemodynamic and metabolic deficits. SGA neonates with normal CBF and CMROreveal minimal structural abnormalities. Physiological imaging may help identify SGA patients at high risk of developing irreversible brain damage.
小于胎龄(SGA)新生儿约占全球出生人口的10%,在某些国家占出生人口的45%。有人认为,SGA可能会导致儿童学习困难和行为异常,但其神经生物学基础尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们采用了几种先进的成像技术,包括自旋标记下的T2弛豫(TRUST)磁共振成像(MRI)和相位对比(PC)MRI,以量化氧摄取分数(OEF)、全脑血流量(CBF)和脑氧代谢率(CMRO),从而阐明SGA新生儿的病理生理脆弱性。
本研究共纳入41例新生儿,其中29例SGA新生儿和12例适于胎龄(AGA)新生儿。SGA组进一步分为结构MRI有异常和无异常的亚组,分别记为SGA-a(N=17)和SGA-n(N=12)。采用TRUST和PC MRI测定OEF、CBF和CMRO。进行线性回归分析,以检验生理参数对扫描年龄、性别和组别的依赖性。对出生体重和脑容量进行了类似分析。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线来检验生理参数区分不同诊断组的能力。
回归分析显示,SGA组的CMRO显著低于AGA组(P=0.04)。当将SGA参与者进一步分为SGA-a和SGA-n亚组时,发现SGA-a亚组的生理缺陷最为明显,其CMRO低于AGA组(P=0.004),CBF也低于AGA组(P=0.007)。相反,SGA-n亚组的CMRO(P=0.40)和CBF(P=0.90)与AGA组无差异。因此,SGA-a组的CBF显著低于SGA-n组(P=0.01),CMRO2也存在差异(P=0.09)。此外,在这个早期发育阶段,CMRO(P=0.002)和CBF(P=0.04)随年龄增长而增加。在分析SGA-a亚组与其余新生儿时,出生体重、OEF、CMRO、CBF和脑容量的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.6、0.6、0.7、0.8和0.5。在分析SGA-a亚组与SGA-n亚组时,出生体重、OEF、CMRO、CBF和脑容量的AUC值分别为0.5、0.6、0.7、0.8和0.5。
SGA-a新生儿的结构损伤与脑血流动力学和代谢缺陷有关。CBF和CMRO正常的SGA新生儿显示出最小的结构异常。生理成像可能有助于识别有发生不可逆脑损伤高风险的SGA患者。