Division of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Kornhauser Health Sciences Library, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Mar;32(2):204-222. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12845. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
PROP test (6-n-propylthiouracil) for the identification of genetic sensitivity to caries in young individuals has emerged as a useful tool for caries risk assessment.
To systematically appraise available evidence on the association between genetic taste sensitivity, as detected by (PROP), and caries.
Seven databases, as of March 2020, were searched. Search terms included 'caries', 'taste predisposition', 'PROP'. Risk of bias assessment was performed using ROBINS-I tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed with GRADE. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize data, and pooled effects were estimated through standardized mean differences (SMDs) and associated confidence Intervals (95% CIs).
Of 92 articles initially retrieved, 12 were eligible for inclusion. Seven contributed to the meta-analyses. All were cross-sectional studies, with moderate-to-serious risk of bias. The non-tasters of PROP exhibited a significantly higher value for the DMFT compared with tasters (SMD: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.56; P < .001), whereas the association for the DMFS was SMD: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.66, 2.01; P < .001 (non-tasters versus super-tasters). The quality of evidence was very low overall.
Within the limitations of this study, non-tasters to PROP exhibited higher caries experience, with subsequent clinical implications for follow-up and management of the 'high-susceptibility' individuals.
PROP 测试(6-正丙基硫氧嘧啶)已成为一种用于龋齿风险评估的有用工具,用于鉴定年轻人对龋齿的遗传敏感性。
系统评价 PROP 检测到的遗传味觉敏感性与龋齿之间的关联的现有证据。
截至 2020 年 3 月,检索了 7 个数据库。搜索词包括“龋齿”、“味觉倾向”、“PROP”。使用 ROBINS-I 工具评估偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 评估证据质量。进行随机效应荟萃分析以综合数据,并通过标准化均数差异(SMD)和相关置信区间(95%CI)估计合并效应。
最初检索到的 92 篇文章中,有 12 篇符合纳入标准。其中 7 篇纳入荟萃分析。所有研究均为横断面研究,存在中度至严重的偏倚风险。PROP 的非味觉者与味觉者相比,DMFT 值明显更高(SMD:1.23;95%CI:0.90,1.56;P<.001),而 DMFS 的关联为 SMD:1.34;95%CI:0.66,2.01;P<.001(非味觉者与超级味觉者)。总体而言,证据质量非常低。
在本研究的限制范围内,PROP 的非味觉者表现出更高的龋齿经验,对“高敏感性”个体的随访和管理具有后续临床意义。