Department of Experimental and Clinical Toxicology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Center for Molecular Signaling (PZMS), Saarland University, Homburg, 66421, Germany.
Drug Test Anal. 2021 Sep;13(9):1603-1613. doi: 10.1002/dta.3106. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
Recently, we presented a strategy for analysis of eight biomarkers in human urine to verify toxic mushroom or Ricinus communis ingestions. However, screening for the full panel is not always necessary. Thus, we aimed to develop a strategy to reduce analysis time and by focusing on two sets of analytes. One set (A) for biomarkers of late-onset syndromes, such as phalloides syndrome or the syndrome after castor bean intake. Another set (B) for biomarkers of early-onset syndromes, such as pantherine-muscaria syndrome and muscarine syndrome. Both analyses should be based on hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS)/MS (HILIC-HRMS/MS). For A, urine samples were prepared by liquid-liquid extraction using dichloromethane and subsequent solid-phase extraction of the aqueous supernatant. For B urine was precipitated using acetonitrile. Method A was validated for ricinine and α- and β-amanitin and method B for muscarine, muscimol, and ibotenic acid according to the specifications for qualitative analytical methods. In addition, robustness of recovery and normalized matrix factors to matrix variability measured by urinary creatinine was tested. Moreover, applicability was tested using 10 urine samples from patients after suspected mushroom intoxication. The analytes α- and β-amanitin, muscarine, muscimol, and ibotenic acid could be successfully identified. Finally, psilocin-O-glucuronide could be identified in two samples and unambiguously distinguished from bufotenine-O-glucuronide via their MS patterns. In summary, the current workflow offers several advantages towards the previous method, particularly being more labor-, time-, and cost-efficient, more robust, and more sensitive.
最近,我们提出了一种分析人尿中 8 种生物标志物的策略,以验证毒蕈或蓖麻摄入。然而,并非总是需要全面筛选。因此,我们旨在开发一种策略,通过聚焦于两组分析物来缩短分析时间。一组(A)用于检测后期综合征的生物标志物,如鳞柄白毒伞综合征或蓖麻摄入后的综合征。另一组(B)用于检测早期综合征的生物标志物,如豹斑鹅膏蕈和毒蕈碱综合征。这两种分析都应基于亲水相互作用液相色谱与高分辨质谱联用(HILIC-HRMS/MS)。对于 A,尿样通过使用二氯甲烷的液液萃取,然后对水相上清液进行固相萃取进行制备。对于 B,尿样用乙腈沉淀。方法 A 针对瑞可宁、α-和 β-鹅膏蕈碱进行了验证,方法 B 针对毒蕈碱、muscimol 和异恶唑丙酸进行了验证,均符合定性分析方法的规范。此外,还通过尿肌酐测试了恢复和归一化基质因子对基质变异性的稳健性。此外,还使用 10 例疑似蘑菇中毒患者的尿样对适用性进行了测试。可以成功识别出 α-和 β-鹅膏蕈碱、毒蕈碱、muscimol 和异恶唑丙酸等分析物。最后,在两个样本中鉴定出了 psilocin-O-葡糖苷酸,并通过其 MS 图谱与 bufotenine-O-葡糖苷酸进行了明确区分。总之,与之前的方法相比,当前的工作流程具有几个优势,特别是更节省劳力、时间和成本,更稳健,更灵敏。