Suppr超能文献

市场环境下能否坚持研究诚信?委托型研究组织的经验教训。

Can research integrity prevail in the market? Lessons from commissioned research organizations.

机构信息

Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Account Res. 2022 Oct;29(7):415-441. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1937603. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Abstract

Competition and exposure to market forces can make it difficult for researchers to conduct their work with integrity. Some research organizations must acquire most of their funding through commissioned research, providing research services for paying clients. Studying such organizations can give insight into how researchers try, and sometimes fail, to balance academic norms with the need to secure funding. Based on interviews with social scientists in commissioned research organizations, this study shows how clients can exert an undue influence on the research process and how competition for funding can make it difficult to live up to academic quality standards. However, it also shows how commissioned research can be a source of identity and motivation. It involves a high degree of impact and access to good data, as clients commission research projects because they want knowledge to solve specific problems. Moreover, the participants discussed how they and the organizations where they worked learned from their experiences how to counteract the negative aspects of competition.

摘要

竞争和市场力量的影响可能使研究人员难以诚信地开展工作。一些研究机构必须通过委托研究获得大部分资金,为付费客户提供研究服务。研究这些组织可以深入了解研究人员如何努力(有时失败)在平衡学术规范与获得资金的需求之间取得平衡。本研究基于对委托研究机构的社会科学家的访谈,展示了客户如何对研究过程施加不当影响,以及资金竞争如何使得难以达到学术质量标准。然而,它也展示了委托研究如何成为身份认同和动力的源泉。它涉及到高度的影响力和获取优质数据的机会,因为客户委托研究项目是因为他们希望通过知识解决具体问题。此外,参与者讨论了他们和他们所在的组织如何从经验中学习,以克服竞争的负面影响。

相似文献

8
Market power in the United States red meatpacking industry.美国红肉包装行业的市场支配力。
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2003 Jul;19(2):519-44. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0720(03)00030-6.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity.研究机构可以采取哪些措施来培养研究诚信
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2363-2369. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00178-5. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
3
The Quest for Clarity in Research Integrity: A Conceptual Schema.追求研究诚信的清晰性:概念框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Aug;25(4):1085-1093. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0052-2. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
5
Industry sponsorship and research outcome.行业赞助与研究成果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2(2):MR000033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3.
9
Research integrity in China.中国的科研诚信。
Science. 2013 Nov 29;342(6162):1019. doi: 10.1126/science.1247700.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验