• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蕈样肉芽肿和塞扎里综合征初诊时的组织病理学分期。三种不同预后组的定义。

Histopathologic staging at initial diagnosis of mycosis fungoides and the Sézary syndrome. Definition of three distinctive prognostic groups.

作者信息

Sausville E A, Eddy J L, Makuch R W, Fischmann A B, Schechter G P, Matthews M, Glatstein E, Ihde D C, Kaye F, Veach S R

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1988 Sep 1;109(5):372-82. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-109-5-372.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-109-5-372
PMID:3408055
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal staging evaluation at the time of initial diagnosis of mycosis fungoides or the Sézary syndrome.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of a uniformly staged inception cohort.

SETTING

Single-institution tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

152 consecutive patients who had mycosis fungoides with or without the Sézary syndrome within 6 months of the initial definitive diagnosis.

INTERVENTION

A detailed staging evaluation including physical examination, routine laboratory studies, chest roentgenogram, lymphangiogram, peripheral blood smear, lymph node biopsy, bone marrow aspirate or biopsy, and liver biopsy in selected patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Univariate adverse prognostic features at initial diagnosis in patients with mycosis fungoides included (P less than 0.01) one or more cutaneous tumors or generalized erythroderma, adenopathy, blood smear involvement with Sézary cells, lymph node effacement, eosinophilia, and visceral involvement. Important, independent prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis are the presence of visceral disease and type of skin involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

A staging system based on histopathologic evaluation of skin, lymph nodes, blood, and visceral sites provides more comprehensive prognostic information than clinical evaluation of skin disease and adenopathy. Patients may be divided at initial presentation into three prognostic groups: good-risk patients, who have plaque-only skin disease without lymph node, blood, or visceral involvement (median survival, greater than 12 years); intermediate-risk patients, who have cutaneous tumors, erythroderma, or plaque disease with node or blood involvement but no visceral disease or node effacement (median survival, 5 years); and poor-risk patients, who have visceral involvement or node effacement (median survival, 2.5 years).

摘要

研究目的

确定蕈样肉芽肿或塞扎里综合征初诊时的最佳分期评估方法。

设计

对一个统一分期的起始队列进行回顾性研究。

地点

单机构三级医疗中心。

患者

152例在首次明确诊断后6个月内患有蕈样肉芽肿伴或不伴塞扎里综合征的连续患者。

干预措施

进行详细的分期评估,包括体格检查、常规实验室检查、胸部X线片、淋巴管造影、外周血涂片、淋巴结活检、骨髓穿刺或活检,以及对部分患者进行肝活检。

测量指标及主要结果

蕈样肉芽肿患者初诊时的单因素不良预后特征包括(P<0.01)一个或多个皮肤肿瘤或全身性红皮病、淋巴结病、血涂片中有塞扎里细胞、淋巴结结构破坏、嗜酸性粒细胞增多和内脏受累。多因素分析中重要的独立预后因素是内脏疾病的存在和皮肤受累类型。

结论

基于皮肤、淋巴结、血液和内脏部位组织病理学评估的分期系统比仅对皮肤疾病和淋巴结病进行临床评估能提供更全面的预后信息。患者在初次就诊时可分为三个预后组:低风险患者,仅患有斑块状皮肤疾病,无淋巴结、血液或内脏受累(中位生存期,大于12年);中风险患者,患有皮肤肿瘤、红皮病或伴有淋巴结或血液受累的斑块状疾病,但无内脏疾病或淋巴结结构破坏(中位生存期,5年);高风险患者,有内脏受累或淋巴结结构破坏(中位生存期,2.5年)。

相似文献

1
Histopathologic staging at initial diagnosis of mycosis fungoides and the Sézary syndrome. Definition of three distinctive prognostic groups.蕈样肉芽肿和塞扎里综合征初诊时的组织病理学分期。三种不同预后组的定义。
Ann Intern Med. 1988 Sep 1;109(5):372-82. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-109-5-372.
2
Prognostic factors and evaluation of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Jul;37(1):58-67. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(97)70212-3.
3
Molecular staging of lymph nodes from 60 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: correlation with histopathology and outcome suggests prognostic relevance in mycosis fungoides.60例蕈样肉芽肿和塞扎里综合征患者淋巴结的分子分期:与组织病理学及预后的相关性提示其在蕈样肉芽肿中具有预后意义。
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Oct;155(4):756-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07428.x.
4
Mycosis fungoides and the Sézary syndrome: pathology, staging, and treatment.蕈样肉芽肿和塞扎里综合征:病理学、分期及治疗
Curr Probl Cancer. 1990 Nov-Dec;14(6):293-371. doi: 10.1016/0147-0272(90)90018-l.
5
Prognostic factors, prognostic indices and staging in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: where are we now?蕈样肉芽肿和塞扎里综合征的预后因素、预后指标和分期:我们现在在哪里?
Br J Dermatol. 2014 Jun;170(6):1226-36. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12909.
6
Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: validation of the revised International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer staging proposal.蕈样肉芽肿/赛泽里综合征的生存结局和预后因素:修订的国际皮肤淋巴瘤学会/欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织分期建议的验证。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4730-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.7665. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
7
Prognostic factors in erythrodermic mycosis fungoides and the Sézary syndrome.红皮病型蕈样肉芽肿和塞扎里综合征的预后因素。
Arch Dermatol. 1995 Sep;131(9):1003-8.
8
Histologic assessment of lymph nodes in mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (cutaneous T-cell lymphoma): clinical correlations and prognostic import of a new classification system.蕈样肉芽肿/塞扎里综合征(皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤)中淋巴结的组织学评估:一种新分类系统的临床相关性及预后意义
Hum Pathol. 1985 Nov;16(11):1098-109. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(85)80177-5.
9
Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: Current challenges in assessment, management and prognostic markers.蕈样肉芽肿和 Sézary 综合征:评估、管理及预后标志物方面的当前挑战
Australas J Dermatol. 2016 Aug;57(3):182-91. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12349. Epub 2015 May 18.
10
Clinical and Histological Characteristics of Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: A Retrospective, Single-centre Study of 43 Patients from Eastern Denmark.丹麦东部单中心回顾性研究 43 例蕈样肉芽肿和赛泽里综合征的临床和组织学特征。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2019 Dec 1;99(13):1231-1236. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3351.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive update of extracutaneous involvement of mycosis fungoides: A narrative review of literature.蕈样肉芽肿皮肤外受累的全面更新:文献综述
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 9;104(19):e42279. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042279.
2
Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: clinical presentation, diagnosis, staging, and therapeutic management.蕈样肉芽肿和塞扎里综合征:临床表现、诊断、分期及治疗管理
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 14;13:1141108. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1141108. eCollection 2023.
3
Interventions for mycosis fungoides.蕈样肉芽肿的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD008946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008946.pub3.
4
Mycosis fungoides: developments in incidence, treatment and survival.蕈样肉芽肿:发病率、治疗及生存情况的进展
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Oct;34(10):2288-2294. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16325. Epub 2020 May 24.
5
Fulminant Mycosis Fungoides with Tissue Eosinophilia: A Unique Presentation of Two Cases with Acro-Periorbital Ulceration and An Aggressive Clinical Course.伴有组织嗜酸性粒细胞增多的暴发性蕈样肉芽肿:两例以肢端-眶周溃疡为表现且临床病程侵袭性的独特病例
J Mol Biomark Diagn. 2017 May;8(3). doi: 10.4172/2155-9929.1000337. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
6
The influence of the coexpression of CD4 and CD8 in cutaneous lesions on prognosis of mycosis fungoides: a preliminary study.皮肤病变中CD4和CD8共表达对蕈样肉芽肿预后的影响:一项初步研究。
J Skin Cancer. 2014;2014:624143. doi: 10.1155/2014/624143. Epub 2014 Jul 20.
7
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome.蕈样肉芽肿和塞扎里综合征的异基因造血细胞移植
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Nov;49(11):1360-5. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.161. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
8
Long-term outcomes of 1,263 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome from 1982 to 2009.1982 年至 2009 年间 1263 例蕈样肉芽肿和赛泽里综合征患者的长期预后。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Sep 15;18(18):5051-60. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0604. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
9
Pruritus in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: a review.皮肤 T 细胞淋巴瘤的瘙痒:综述。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Oct;67(4):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.12.021. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
10
Clinical end points and response criteria in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a consensus statement of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas, the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium, and the Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.蕈样肉芽肿和塞扎里综合征的临床终点和反应标准:国际皮肤淋巴瘤学会、美国皮肤淋巴瘤联盟以及欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织皮肤淋巴瘤工作组的共识声明。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;29(18):2598-607. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.0630. Epub 2011 May 16.