Suppr超能文献

连续热稀释技术准确评估冠状动脉血流:在猪模型中的验证。

Accurate assessment of coronary blood flow by continuous thermodilution technique: Validation in a swine model.

机构信息

Arnault Tzanck Institute, Department of Cardiology, Saint Laurent du Var, France.

Paris Descartes University, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):836-843. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29802. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of coronary thermodilution measurements made with the RayFlow® infusion catheter.

BACKGROUND

Measurements of absolute coronary blood flow (ABF) and absolute microvascular resistance (R ) by continuous coronary thermodilution can be obtained in humans but their accuracy using a novel dedicated infusion catheter has not yet been validated. We compared ABF values obtained at different infusion rates to coronary blood flow (CBF) values obtained using flow probes, in swine.

METHODS

Twelve domestic swine were instrumented with coronary flow probes placed around the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries. ABF was assessed with the RayFlow® infusion catheter during continuous saline infusion at fixed rates of 5 (n = 14), 10 (n = 15), 15 (n = 19), and 20 (n = 12) ml/min.

RESULTS

In the 60 measurements, ABF measured using thermodilution averaged 41 ± 17 ml/min (range from 17 to 90) and CBF values obtained with the coronary flow probes averaged 37 ± 18 ml/min (range from 8 to 87). The corresponding R values were 1532 ± 791 (range from 323 to 5103) and 1903 ± 1162 (range from 287 to 6000) Woods units using thermodilution and coronary flow probe assessments, respectively. ABF and R values measured using thermodilution were significantly correlated with the corresponding measurements obtained using coronary flow probes (R = 0.84 [0.73-0.95] and R = 0.80 [0.69-0.88], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

ABF and R assessed by continuous saline infusion through a RayFlow® catheter closely correlate with measurements obtained with the gold standard coronary flow probes in a swine model.

摘要

目的

评估使用 RayFlow®输注导管进行冠状动脉热稀释测量的准确性。

背景

通过连续冠状动脉热稀释可以在人体中获得绝对冠状动脉血流(ABF)和绝对微血管阻力(R)的测量值,但尚未验证使用新型专用输注导管的准确性。我们比较了在不同输注率下使用 RayFlow®输注导管获得的 ABF 值与使用血流探头在猪身上获得的冠状动脉血流(CBF)值。

方法

12 只家猪接受了冠状动脉血流探头的仪器操作,探头放置在左前降支和回旋支冠状动脉周围。使用 RayFlow®输注导管在固定速率 5(n=14)、10(n=15)、15(n=19)和 20(n=12)ml/min 下进行连续盐水输注时评估 ABF。

结果

在 60 次测量中,热稀释法测量的 ABF 平均值为 41±17ml/min(范围为 17 至 90),冠状动脉血流探头测量的 CBF 值平均值为 37±18ml/min(范围为 8 至 87)。相应的 R 值分别为热稀释法测量的 1532±791(范围为 323 至 5103)和冠状动脉血流探头评估的 1903±1162(范围为 287 至 6000)Woods 单位。使用热稀释法测量的 ABF 和 R 值与使用冠状动脉血流探头获得的相应测量值显著相关(R=0.84 [0.73-0.95] 和 R=0.80 [0.69-0.88])。

结论

通过 RayFlow®导管连续盐水输注评估的 ABF 和 R 与猪模型中使用金标准冠状动脉血流探头获得的测量值密切相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验