• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于非工作时间初级保健呼叫的原创护士电话分诊工具的可靠性和有效性:SALOMON算法

Reliability and validity of an original nurse telephone triage tool for out-of-hours primary care calls: the SALOMON algorithm.

作者信息

Brasseur Edmond, Gilbert Allison, Donneau Anne-Françoise, Monseur Justine, Ghuysen Alexandre, D'Orio Vincent

机构信息

Emergency Department, University Hospital Center of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Biostatistics Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Clin Belg. 2022 Jun;77(3):640-646. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2021.1936353. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1080/17843286.2021.1936353
PMID:34081571
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Due to the persistent primary care physicians shortage and the substantial increase in their workload, the organization of primary care calls during out-of-hours periods has become an everyday challenge. The SALOMON algorithm is an original nurse telephone triage tool allowing to dispatch patients to the best level of care according to their conditions. This study evaluated its reliability and criterion validity in rea-life settings.

METHODS

In this 5-year study, out-of-hours primary care calls were dispatched into four categories: Emergency Medical Services Intervention (EMSI), Emergency Department referred Consultation (EDRC), Primary Care Physician Home visit (PCPH), and Primary Care Physician Delayed visit (PCPD). We included data of patients' triage category, resources, and destination. Patients included into the primary care cohort were classified undertriaged if they had to be redirected to an emergency department (ED). Patients from the ED cohort were considered overtriaged if they did not require at least three diagnostic resources, one emergency-specific treatment or any hospitalization. In the ED cohort, only patients from the University Hospitals were considered.

RESULTS

10,207 calls were triaged using the SALOMON tool: 19.2% were classified as EMSI, 15.8% as EDRC, 62.8% as PCPH, and 2.2% as PCPD. The triage was appropriate for 85.5% of the calls with a 14.5% overtriage rate. In the PCPD/PCPH cohort, 96.9% of the calls were accurately triaged and 3.1% were undertriaged. SALOMON sensitivity and specificity reached 76.6% and 98.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SALOMON algorithm is a valid triage tool that has the potential to improve the organization of out-of-hours primary care work.

摘要

目的

由于基层医疗医生持续短缺且工作量大幅增加,非工作时间基层医疗呼叫的组织已成为日常挑战。SALOMON算法是一种原创的护士电话分诊工具,可根据患者病情将其分配到最佳护理级别。本研究评估了其在实际环境中的可靠性和标准效度。

方法

在这项为期5年的研究中,非工作时间的基层医疗呼叫被分为四类:紧急医疗服务干预(EMSI)、急诊科转诊会诊(EDRC)、基层医疗医生家访(PCPH)和基层医疗医生延迟就诊(PCPD)。我们纳入了患者分诊类别、资源和目的地的数据。如果基层医疗队列中的患者必须被转至急诊科(ED),则被归类为分诊不足。如果ED队列中的患者不需要至少三项诊断资源、一项特定于急诊的治疗或任何住院治疗,则被视为分诊过度。在ED队列中,仅考虑大学医院的患者。

结果

使用SALOMON工具对10207次呼叫进行了分诊:19.2%被归类为EMSI,15.8%为EDRC,62.8%为PCPH,2.2%为PCPD。85.5%的呼叫分诊恰当,分诊过度率为14.5%。在PCPD/PCPH队列中,96.9%的呼叫被准确分诊,3.1%为分诊不足。SALOMON的敏感性和特异性分别达到76.6%和98.3%。

结论

SALOMON算法是一种有效的分诊工具,有可能改善非工作时间基层医疗工作的组织。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of an original nurse telephone triage tool for out-of-hours primary care calls: the SALOMON algorithm.一种用于非工作时间初级保健呼叫的原创护士电话分诊工具的可靠性和有效性:SALOMON算法
Acta Clin Belg. 2022 Jun;77(3):640-646. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2021.1936353. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
2
[SALOMON, a collaboration model between primary and secondary care for nocturnal emergency calls].[SALOMON,一种针对夜间紧急呼叫的基层医疗与二级医疗协作模式]
Rev Med Liege. 2020 Feb;75(2):83-88.
3
Triage for out-of-hours primary care calls: a reliability study of a new French-language algorithm, the SALOMON rule.非工作时间初级保健电话分诊:一种新的法语算法 SALOMON 规则的可靠性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):227-232. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608057. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
4
Factors associated with undertriage and overtriage in telephone triage in Danish out-of-hours primary care: a natural quasi-experimental cross-sectional study of randomly selected and high-risk calls.与丹麦非工作时间初级保健电话分诊中分诊不足和分诊过度相关的因素:一项针对随机选择和高风险电话的自然准实验性横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 20;13(3):e064999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064999.
5
Communication quality in telephone triage conducted by general practitioners, nurses or physicians: a quasi-experimental study using the AQTT to assess audio-recorded telephone calls to out-of-hours primary care in Denmark.全科医生、护士或医生进行电话分诊的沟通质量:使用 AQTT 评估丹麦非工作时间初级保健中音频记录的电话通话的准实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 26;10(3):e033528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033528.
6
Safety, efficiency and health-related quality of telephone triage conducted by general practitioners, nurses, or physicians in out-of-hours primary care: a quasi-experimental study using the Assessment of Quality in Telephone Triage (AQTT) to assess audio-recorded telephone calls.在非工作时间的初级保健中,由全科医生、护士或医生进行电话分诊的安全性、效率和与健康相关的质量:使用电话分诊质量评估 (AQTT) 评估音频记录的电话通话的准实验研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 9;21(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01122-z.
7
After-hours telephone triage and advice in private and nonprivate pediatric populations.非工作时间电话分诊及针对私立和非私立儿科人群的建议。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Mar;153(3):292-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.3.292.
8
Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients.儿科患者中急诊严重程度指数(第3版)分诊算法的评估
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;12(3):219-24. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.09.023.
9
Computer assisted assessment and advice for "non-serious" 999 ambulance service callers: the potential impact on ambulance despatch.针对“非紧急”999急救服务呼叫者的计算机辅助评估与建议:对救护车调度的潜在影响
Emerg Med J. 2003 Mar;20(2):178-83. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.178.
10
Factors associated with undertriage in patients classified by the need to visit a hospital by telephone triage: a retrospective cohort study.与电话分诊分类为需要去医院就诊的患者分诊不足相关的因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 15;21(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00552-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Bibliometric Analysis of Telephone Triage Research to 2021 Using VOSviewer.采用 VOSviewer 对 2021 年之前的电话分诊研究进行文献计量分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2024 May 28;2024:5583853. doi: 10.1155/2024/5583853. eCollection 2024.
2
A Symptom-Checker for Adult Patients Visiting an Interdisciplinary Emergency Care Center and the Safety of Patient Self-Triage: Real-Life Prospective Evaluation.成人患者就诊于多学科急诊中心的症状自查工具和患者自我分诊的安全性:真实世界前瞻性评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 27;26:e58157. doi: 10.2196/58157.
3
Patients' self-triage for unscheduled urgent care: a preliminary study on the accuracy and factors affecting the performance of a Belgian self-triage platform.
患者自行分诊非计划性紧急护理:对一个比利时自行分诊平台的准确性及其影响因素的初步研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 23;22(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08571-5.
4
Differences in emergency nurse triage between a simulated setting and the real world, post hoc analysis of a cluster randomised trial.模拟环境与真实世界中急诊护士分诊的差异:一项集群随机试验的事后分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 1;12(7):e059173. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059173.