Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Her Majesty Cardiac Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jun 3;21(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02086-3.
This study aimed to determine native T1 and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) in distinct types of myocardial disease, including amyloidosis, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), myocarditis and coronary artery disease (CAD), compared to controls.
We retrospectively enrolled patients with distinct types of myocardial disease, CAD patients, and control group (no known heart disease and negative CMR study) who underwent 3.0 Tesla CMR with routine T1 mapping. The region of interest (ROI) was drawn in the myocardium of the mid left ventricular (LV) short axis slice and at the interventricular septum of mid LV slice. ECV was calculated by actual hematocrit (Hct) and synthetic Hct. T1 mapping and ECV was compared between myocardial disease and controls, and between CAD and controls. Diagnostic yield and cut-off values were assessed.
A total of 1188 patients were enrolled. The average T1 values in the control group were 1304 ± 42 ms at septum, and 1294 ± 37 ms at mid LV slice. The average T1 values in patients with myocardial disease and CAD were significantly higher than in controls (1441 ± 72, 1349 ± 59, 1345 ± 59, 1355 ± 56, and 1328 ± 54 ms for septum of amyloidosis, DCM, HCM, myocarditis, and CAD). Native T1 of the mid LV level and ECV at septum and mid LV with actual and synthetic Hct of patients with myocardial disease or CAD were significantly higher than in controls.
Although native T1 and ECV of patients with cardiomyopathy and CAD were significantly higher than controls, the values overlapped. The greatest clinical utilization was found for the amyloidosis group.
本研究旨在确定不同类型心肌疾病(包括淀粉样变性、扩张型心肌病[DCM]、肥厚型心肌病[HCM]、心肌炎和冠状动脉疾病[CAD])的固有 T1 和细胞外容积分数(ECV)与对照组相比的差异。
我们回顾性纳入了接受 3.0T MRI 常规 T1 mapping 的不同类型心肌疾病、CAD 患者和对照组(无已知心脏病且 CMR 检查阴性)患者。心肌疾病组的感兴趣区(ROI)绘制于左心室(LV)中部短轴位心肌层面,CAD 组 ROI 绘制于 LV 中部室间隔心肌层面。ECV 通过实际红细胞压积(Hct)和合成 Hct 计算。比较心肌疾病与对照组、CAD 与对照组之间的 T1 mapping 和 ECV,评估诊断效能和截断值。
共纳入 1188 例患者。对照组室间隔的平均 T1 值为 1304±42ms,LV 中部的平均 T1 值为 1294±37ms。心肌疾病和 CAD 患者的平均 T1 值显著高于对照组(室间隔的淀粉样变性、DCM、HCM、心肌炎和 CAD 组分别为 1441±72、1349±59、1345±59、1355±56 和 1328±54ms)。心肌疾病或 CAD 患者的 LV 中部水平固有 T1 值和室间隔及 LV 中部 ECV 值(实际和合成 Hct)均显著高于对照组。
虽然心肌病和 CAD 患者的固有 T1 和 ECV 显著高于对照组,但这些值有重叠。淀粉样变性组的临床应用价值最大。