• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初中生第一年社会关系的演变:从小团体到朋友圈。

Evolution of social relationships between first-year students at middle school: from cliques to circles.

机构信息

Grupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos, Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911, Leganés, Madrid, Spain.

Unidad Mixta Interdisciplinar de Comportamiento y Unidad Social (UMICSS) UC3M-UV-UZ, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911, Leganés, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90984-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-90984-z
PMID:34083609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8175354/
Abstract

People organize their social relationships under a restriction on the number that a single individual can maintain simultaneously (the so-called Dunbar's number, ~150). Additionally, personal networks show a characteristic layered structure where each layer corresponds to relationships of different emotional closeness. This structure, referred to as Dunbar's circles, has mostly been considered from a static viewpoint, and their structure and evolution is largely unexplored. Here we study the issue of the evolution of the structure of positive and negative relationships in early adolescence by using data from students in their first year at middle school obtained from surveys conducted in class in two different waves separated by several months. Our results show that, initially, students have a lower number of total relationships but the majority are more intense and over time they report a higher number of total relationships, but the more intense relationships appear in a lower proportion. We have also found differences in the structure of communities at both temporal moments. While in the first instance the communities that appeared are mixed, made up of both boys and girls, in the second they changed so that they were separated primarily by gender. In addition, the size of each community was stabilized around 15 people, which coincides with the size of the second Dunbar's circle, known as the sympathy group in social psychology. As a consequence, in groups with around 20 students of the same gender, they tend to split in two separate communities of about 10 each, below the second Dunbar's circle threshold. On the other hand, groups with more stable community structure appear to go through the inverse process of friendship evolution, becoming more focused on their best relationships. All these results suggest how the layered structure of the personal network, as well as the community structure of the social network, emerge directly from the union of both positive and negative relationships. Thus, we provide a new perspective about its temporal evolution that may have relevant applications to improve school life and student performance.

摘要

人们根据一个人同时能够维持的社交关系数量(即所谓的邓巴数,约 150)来组织自己的社交关系。此外,个人网络呈现出一种具有特征分层结构的模式,其中每一层对应于不同亲密程度的关系。这种结构通常被称为邓巴圈,主要从静态的角度来考虑,其结构和演化在很大程度上还未被探索。在这里,我们通过使用来自初中生的调查数据来研究青春期早期积极和消极关系结构的演变问题,这些数据是在两个相隔数月的不同时间点在课堂上进行的调查中获得的。我们的研究结果表明,最初,学生的总关系数量较少,但大多数关系较为强烈,随着时间的推移,他们报告的总关系数量增加,但更强烈的关系比例下降。我们还发现了在这两个时间点上社区结构的差异。在最初的情况下,出现的社区是混合的,由男孩和女孩组成,而在第二个时间点,它们发生了变化,主要按性别分开。此外,每个社区的大小稳定在 15 人左右,这与第二个邓巴圈的大小一致,在社会心理学中称为同情群体。因此,在有大约 20 名同性学生的群体中,他们往往会分裂成两个独立的社区,每个社区大约有 10 人,低于第二个邓巴圈的阈值。另一方面,具有更稳定社区结构的群体似乎经历了友谊进化的反向过程,更加关注他们最好的关系。所有这些结果表明,个人网络的分层结构以及社交网络的社区结构如何直接从积极和消极关系的结合中产生。因此,我们提供了一个关于其时间演变的新视角,这可能对改善学校生活和学生表现有相关应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/e009b2e6e7a1/41598_2021_90984_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/c9caf6ae48cd/41598_2021_90984_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/0f3e74305edf/41598_2021_90984_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/b18f83fc4c56/41598_2021_90984_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/832624038057/41598_2021_90984_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/22d50e267ea0/41598_2021_90984_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/b1d903b10553/41598_2021_90984_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/3922f6a7a539/41598_2021_90984_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/57974c314cd4/41598_2021_90984_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/e009b2e6e7a1/41598_2021_90984_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/c9caf6ae48cd/41598_2021_90984_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/0f3e74305edf/41598_2021_90984_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/b18f83fc4c56/41598_2021_90984_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/832624038057/41598_2021_90984_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/22d50e267ea0/41598_2021_90984_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/b1d903b10553/41598_2021_90984_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/3922f6a7a539/41598_2021_90984_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/57974c314cd4/41598_2021_90984_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe8/8175354/e009b2e6e7a1/41598_2021_90984_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of social relationships between first-year students at middle school: from cliques to circles.初中生第一年社会关系的演变:从小团体到朋友圈。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90984-z.
2
Stability in social networks.社交网络中的稳定性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Apr 24;11(4):231500. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231500. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Friendship Concept and Community Network Structure among Elementary School and University Students.小学生和大学生的友谊观念与社区网络结构
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 19;11(10):e0164886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164886. eCollection 2016.
4
Stability of the personal relationship networks in a longitudinal study of middle school students.中学生纵向研究中的人际关系网络稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 4;13(1):14575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41787-x.
5
Trust levels in social networks.社交网络中的信任级别。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 15;9(9):e19850. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19850. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Modeling users' activity on twitter networks: validation of Dunbar's number.在推特网络上模拟用户的活动:邓巴数的验证。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022656. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
7
Turnover in close friendships.亲密友谊的变化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 30;12(1):11018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15070-4.
8
Modularity, balance, and frustration in student social networks: The role of negative relationships in communities.学生社交网络中的模块化、平衡和挫折感:负面关系在社区中的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 8;17(12):e0278647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278647. eCollection 2022.
9
Beyond Dunbar circles: a continuous description of social relationships and resource allocation.超越邓巴数:社会关系与资源分配的连续描述
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 10;12(1):2287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06066-1.
10
Developmental changes in gender composition of friendship networks in adolescent girls and boys.青少年女孩和男孩友谊网络中性别构成的发展变化。
Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1484-1496. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1484.

引用本文的文献

1
Coexistence of balance and hierarchies: An ego perspective to explain empirical networks.平衡与层级的共存:一种解释实证网络的自我视角。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Apr 29;4(5):pgaf130. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf130. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Stability of the personal relationship networks in a longitudinal study of middle school students.中学生纵向研究中的人际关系网络稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 4;13(1):14575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41787-x.
3
The development of the 5Cs of positive youth development in a school year: A 3-wave longitudinal study of Slovenian youth during the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Structure and function in human and primate social networks: implications for diffusion, network stability and health.人类和灵长类动物社交网络的结构与功能:对传播、网络稳定性及健康的影响
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Aug;476(2240):20200446. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0446. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
2
Cognitive resource allocation determines the organization of personal networks.认知资源分配决定了个人网络的组织方式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 14;115(33):8316-8321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719233115. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
3
Structure and consistency of self-reported social contact networks in British secondary schools.
一学年中积极青少年发展的5C要素发展:COVID-19大流行期间对斯洛文尼亚青少年的三波纵向研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 5;14:982856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.982856. eCollection 2023.
4
Triadic influence as a proxy for compatibility in social relationships.三方影响作为社会关系中兼容性的代理。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 28;120(13):e2215041120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215041120. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
5
Modularity, balance, and frustration in student social networks: The role of negative relationships in communities.学生社交网络中的模块化、平衡和挫折感:负面关系在社区中的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 8;17(12):e0278647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278647. eCollection 2022.
英国中学中自我报告的社会联系网络的结构和一致性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 25;13(7):e0200090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200090. eCollection 2018.
4
The Anatomy of Friendship.《友谊的解剖》
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):32-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.004.
5
Fundamental structures of dynamic social networks.动态社会网络的基本结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 6;113(36):9977-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602803113. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
6
Sex differences in social focus across the life cycle in humans.人类生命周期中社会关注的性别差异。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Apr 6;3(4):160097. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160097. eCollection 2016 Apr.
7
Are You Your Friends' Friend? Poor Perception of Friendship Ties Limits the Ability to Promote Behavioral Change.你是你朋友的朋友吗?对友谊关系的认知不足限制了促进行为改变的能力。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 22;11(3):e0151588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151588. eCollection 2016.
8
Social Contact Networks and Mixing among Students in K-12 Schools in Pittsburgh, PA.宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡市K-12学校学生的社交联系网络与交往情况
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0151139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151139. eCollection 2016.
9
Managing Relationship Decay : Network, Gender, and Contextual Effects.应对关系衰退:网络、性别及情境效应
Hum Nat. 2015 Dec;26(4):426-50. doi: 10.1007/s12110-015-9242-7.
10
Social network size in humans.人类的社交网络规模。
Hum Nat. 2003 Mar;14(1):53-72. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y.