McCord Sarah E, Webb Nicholas P, Van Zee Justin W, Burnett Sarah H, Christensen Erica M, Courtright Ericha M, Laney Christine M, Lunch Claire, Maxwell Connie, Karl Jason W, Slaughter Amalia, Stauffer Nelson G, Tweedie Craig
US Department of Agriculture ARS Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States.
Bureau of Land Management, National Operations Center, Denver, Colorado, United States.
Bioscience. 2021 Mar 31;71(6):647-657. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab020. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Ecological studies require quality data to describe the nature of ecological processes and to advance understanding of ecosystem change. Increasing access to big data has magnified both the burden and the complexity of ensuring quality data. The costs of errors in ecology include low use of data, increased time spent cleaning data, and poor reproducibility that can result in a misunderstanding of ecosystem processes and dynamics, all of which can erode the efficacy of and trust in ecological research. Although conceptual and technological advances have improved ecological data access and management, a cultural shift is needed to embed data quality as a cultural practice. We present a comprehensive data quality framework to evoke this cultural shift. The data quality framework flexibly supports different collaboration models, supports all types of ecological data, and can be used to describe data quality within both short- and long-term ecological studies.
生态研究需要高质量的数据来描述生态过程的本质,并增进对生态系统变化的理解。获取大数据的机会增加,放大了确保数据质量的负担和复杂性。生态学中错误的代价包括数据利用率低、清理数据花费的时间增加以及可重复性差,这可能导致对生态系统过程和动态的误解,所有这些都会削弱生态研究的效力和可信度。尽管概念和技术进步改善了生态数据的获取和管理,但仍需要一种文化转变,将数据质量作为一种文化实践加以确立。我们提出了一个全面的数据质量框架来引发这种文化转变。该数据质量框架灵活地支持不同的协作模式,支持所有类型的生态数据,可用于描述短期和长期生态研究中的数据质量。