Campbell Lindsay K, Svendsen Erika S, Roman Lara A
New York City Urban Field Station, USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, 431 Walter Reed Road, Bayside, NY, 11359, USA.
Philadelphia Field Station, USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, 100 N. 20th St., Suite 205, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA.
Environ Manage. 2016 Jun;57(6):1262-80. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0680-8. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
Cities are increasingly engaging in sustainability efforts and investment in green infrastructure, including large-scale urban tree planting campaigns. In this context, researchers and practitioners are working jointly to develop applicable knowledge for planning and managing the urban forest. This paper presents three case studies of knowledge co-production in the field of urban forestry in the United States. These cases were selected to span a range of geographic scales and topical scopes; all three are examples of urban researcher-practitioner networks in which the authors are situated to comment on reflexively. The three cases resemble institutional structures described in the knowledge co-production literature, including participatory research, a hybrid organization of scientists and managers, and a community of practice. We find that trust, embeddedness, new approaches by both practitioners and researchers, and blending of roles all serve to recognize multiple forms of capability, expertise, and ways of knowing. We discuss the impacts of knowledge co-production and the ways in which hybrid institutional forms can enable its occurrence.
城市越来越多地参与可持续发展努力,并对绿色基础设施进行投资,包括大规模的城市植树活动。在此背景下,研究人员和从业者正在共同努力,开发适用于城市森林规划和管理的知识。本文介绍了美国城市林业领域知识共同生产的三个案例研究。这些案例的选择涵盖了一系列地理尺度和主题范围;所有这三个案例都是城市研究人员与从业者网络的实例,作者置身其中并能进行反思性评论。这三个案例类似于知识共同生产文献中描述的机构结构,包括参与式研究、科学家与管理者的混合组织以及实践社区。我们发现,信任、嵌入性、从业者和研究人员的新方法以及角色融合都有助于认可多种形式的能力、专业知识和认知方式。我们讨论了知识共同生产的影响以及混合机构形式能够促成其发生的方式。