Verbruggen Lise, Sprimont Lindsay, Bentea Eduard, Janssen Pauline, Gharib Azzedine, Deneyer Lauren, De Pauw Laura, Lara Olaya, Sato Hideyo, Nicaise Charles, Massie Ann
Laboratory of Neuro-Aging & Viro-Immunotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Laboratory Neurodegeneration and Regeneration, URPHyM-NARILIS, Université de Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 18;12:625699. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.625699. eCollection 2021.
Despite ample evidence for the therapeutic potential of inhibition of the cystine/glutamate antiporter system x in neurological disorders and in cancer, none of the proposed inhibitors is selective. In this context, a lot of research has been performed using the EMA- and FDA-approved drug sulfasalazine (SAS). Even though this molecule is already on the market for decades as an anti-inflammatory drug, serious side effects due to its use have been reported. Whereas for the treatment of the main indications, SAS needs to be cleaved in the intestine into the anti-inflammatory compound mesalazine, it needs to reach the systemic circulation in its intact form to allow inhibition of system x . The higher plasma levels of intact SAS (or its metabolites) might induce adverse effects, independent of its action on system x . Some of these effects have however been attributed to system x inhibition, calling into question the safety of targeting system x . In this study we chronically treated system x - deficient mice and their wildtype littermates with two different doses of SAS (160 mg/kg twice daily or 320 mg/kg once daily, i.p.) and studied some of the adverse effects that were previously reported. SAS had a negative impact on the survival rate, the body weight, the thermoregulation and/or stress reaction of mice of both genotypes, and thus independent of its inhibitory action on system x . While SAS decreased the total distance travelled in the open-field test the first time the mice encountered the test, it did not influence this parameter on the long-term and it did not induce other behavioral changes such as anxiety- or depressive-like behavior. Finally, no major histological abnormalities were observed in the spinal cord. To conclude, we were unable to identify any undesirable system x -dependent effect of chronic administration of SAS.
尽管有充分证据表明抑制胱氨酸/谷氨酸反向转运体系统x在神经疾病和癌症中具有治疗潜力,但目前提出的抑制剂均无选择性。在此背景下,人们使用已获欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的药物柳氮磺胺吡啶(SAS)进行了大量研究。尽管该分子作为抗炎药物已上市数十年,但使用时仍有严重副作用的报道。对于主要适应症的治疗,SAS需要在肠道内裂解为抗炎化合物美沙拉嗪,而它需要以完整形式进入体循环才能抑制系统x。完整的SAS(或其代谢产物)较高的血浆水平可能会引发不良反应,这与其对系统x的作用无关。然而,其中一些影响被归因于系统x的抑制作用,这使得针对系统x的安全性受到质疑。在本研究中,我们用两种不同剂量的SAS(每天两次,每次160mg/kg或每天一次,每次320mg/kg,腹腔注射)长期治疗系统x缺陷小鼠及其野生型同窝小鼠,并研究了一些先前报道的不良反应。SAS对两种基因型小鼠的存活率、体重、体温调节和/或应激反应均有负面影响,因此与它对系统x的抑制作用无关。虽然在小鼠首次接触旷场试验时,SAS减少了其在旷场试验中的总移动距离,但从长期来看它并未影响该参数,也未诱发其他行为变化,如焦虑或抑郁样行为。最后,在脊髓中未观察到明显的组织学异常。总之,我们未能发现长期给予SAS会产生任何不良的系统x依赖性效应。