Jayswal Diptiman, Roy Uttam Kumar, Ghosh Taraknath, Mandal Purnendu
Department of Pharmacology, Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, Bardhaman, West Bengal, India.
Department of Pharmacology, Raiganj Government Medical College and Hospital, Raiganj, West Bengal, India.
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Mar 31;10:118. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_937_20. eCollection 2021.
Neonatal seizure (NS) reflects serious underlying brain injury, requiring immediate evaluation and early treatment. In neonates, phenobarbitone and phenytoin are used primarily to control the seizures. If uncontrolled, widespread off-label use of midazolam and levetiracetam was practiced. These drugs gained popularity though there are no such studies available on literature search comparing them. The present study was designed to explore these lacunae using these two drugs in refractory cases. To study the efficacy and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of midazolam and levetiracetam not responding to usual line of therapy.
This was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted on 69 neonates in the NICU and Department of Pharmacology in Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal. Patients receiving midazolam or levetiracetam when uncontrolled with first line antiepileptics, namely, phenobarbitone and phenytoin, were considered eligible. The study variables were time to control seizure, seizure recurrence and frequency, and treatment-related adverse events. analysis used Mann-Whitney U-test were applied Comparison with respect to time to control and Chi-square test were applied to detect difference in proportion for ADRs. The SPSS Statistics 17.0 was used for analysis.
We compared the time periods to control neonatal seizure for effectiveness between levetiracetam and midazolam showing no significant difference ( = 0.190). Comparing the portion of recurrences in two groups gives statistically nonsignificant ( = 0.878) result. Only respiratory depression was seen in the levetiracetam group (12.90%) and midazolam group (18.42%). All adverse events were 'probable' as per the WHO-UMC criteria, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two drugs ( = 0.533).
Both midazolam and levetiracetam are equally effective and safe in NS not responding to usual line of treatment.
新生儿惊厥(NS)反映了严重的潜在脑损伤,需要立即评估和早期治疗。在新生儿中,苯巴比妥和苯妥英主要用于控制惊厥。如果惊厥无法控制,则广泛存在咪达唑仑和左乙拉西坦的超说明书用药情况。尽管在文献检索中没有比较它们的研究,但这些药物越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在通过在难治性病例中使用这两种药物来探索这些空白。研究咪达唑仑和左乙拉西坦对常规治疗无效时的疗效和药物不良反应(ADR)。
这是一项前瞻性横断面研究,在西孟加拉邦布尔万医学院和医院的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)和药理学系对69名新生儿进行。当一线抗癫痫药物(即苯巴比妥和苯妥英)无法控制惊厥时接受咪达唑仑或左乙拉西坦治疗的患者被认为符合条件。研究变量包括惊厥控制时间、惊厥复发情况及频率,以及治疗相关不良事件。分析采用曼-惠特尼U检验进行比较控制时间,采用卡方检验检测ADR比例差异。使用SPSS Statistics 17.0进行分析。
我们比较了左乙拉西坦和咪达唑仑控制新生儿惊厥有效性的时间段,结果显示无显著差异(=0.190)。比较两组的复发比例得出无统计学意义(=0.878)的结果。仅在左乙拉西坦组(12.90%)和咪达唑仑组(18.42%)出现了呼吸抑制。根据世界卫生组织药物不良反应监测中心(WHO-UMC)标准,所有不良事件均为“可能”,且两种药物之间无统计学显著差异(=0.533)。
在对常规治疗无效的新生儿惊厥中,咪达唑仑和左乙拉西坦同样有效且安全。