Suppr超能文献

院前咪达唑仑用于快速抗惊厥药物到达前试验前后苯二氮䓬类药物治疗的癫痫发作:一项全国性观察性队列研究。

Pre-hospital midazolam for benzodiazepine-treated seizures before and after the Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial: A national observational cohort study.

作者信息

Shtull-Leber Eytan, Silbergleit Robert, Meurer William J

机构信息

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Mar 17;12(3):e0173539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173539. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implementation of evidence-based treatment for pre-hospital status epilepticus can improve outcomes. We hypothesized that publication of a pivotal pre-hospital clinical trial (RAMPART), demonstrating superiority of intramuscular midazolam over intravenous lorazepam, altered the national utilization rates of midazolam for pre-hospital benzodiazepine-treated seizures, while upholding its safety and efficacy outside the trial setting.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This is a retrospective, observational cohort study of pre-hospital patient encounters throughout the United States in the National Emergency Medicine Services Information System database, from January 2010 through December 2014. We compared the rates and odds of midazolam use as first-line treatment among all adult and pediatric benzodiazepine-treated seizures before and after RAMPART publication (February 2012). Secondary analyses were conducted for rates of airway interventions and rescue therapy, as proxies for safety and efficacy of seizure termination. 156,539 benzodiazepine-treated seizures were identified. Midazolam use increased from 26.1% in January 2010 to 61.7% in December 2014 (difference +35.6%, 95% CI, 32.7%-38.4%). The annual rate of midazolam adoption increased significantly from 5.9% per year to 8.9% per year after the publication of RAMPART (difference +3.0% per year; 95%CI, 1.6%-4.5% per year; adjusted OR 1.24; 95%CI, 1.17-1.32). Overall frequency of rescue therapy and airway interventions changed little after the publication of RAMPART.

CONCLUSIONS

These data are consistent with effective, ongoing, but incomplete clinical translation of the RAMPART results. The effects of the trial, however, cannot be isolated. The study was limited by broad inclusion of all benzodiazepine-treated seizures as well as a lack of information on route of drug of administration. The safety and effectiveness of midazolam for benzodiazepine-treated seizures in prehospital clinical practice appear consistent with trial data, which should encourage continuing increases in utilization.

摘要

背景

实施基于证据的院前癫痫持续状态治疗可改善治疗效果。我们推测,一项关键的院前临床试验(RAMPART)的发表显示了肌内注射咪达唑仑优于静脉注射劳拉西泮,这改变了全国院前使用苯二氮䓬类药物治疗癫痫发作时咪达唑仑的使用率,同时在试验环境之外保持了其安全性和有效性。

方法与结果

这是一项回顾性观察队列研究,研究对象为2010年1月至2014年12月期间美国国家急诊医疗服务信息系统数据库中所有院前患者就诊情况。我们比较了RAMPART发表之前和之后(2012年2月)所有成人和儿童苯二氮䓬类药物治疗癫痫发作中使用咪达唑仑作为一线治疗的比例和比值。对气道干预和抢救治疗的比例进行了二次分析,以此作为癫痫终止安全性和有效性的替代指标。共识别出156,539例接受苯二氮䓬类药物治疗的癫痫发作。咪达唑仑的使用率从2010年1月的26.1%增至2014年12月的61.7%(差异为+35.6%,95%置信区间为32.7%-38.4%)。RAMPART发表后,咪达唑仑的年采用率从每年5.9%显著增至每年8.9%(每年差异为+3.0%;95%置信区间为每年1.6%-4.5%;校正比值比为1.24;95%置信区间为1.17-1.32)。RAMPART发表后,抢救治疗和气道干预的总体频率变化不大。

结论

这些数据与RAMPART结果有效、持续但不完整的临床转化一致。然而,该试验的效果并非孤立存在。该研究的局限性在于广泛纳入了所有接受苯二氮䓬类药物治疗的癫痫发作,以及缺乏给药途径信息。在院前临床实践中,咪达唑仑用于苯二氮䓬类药物治疗癫痫发作的安全性和有效性似乎与试验数据一致,这应会促使其使用率持续上升。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab3/5356996/046b11853b33/pone.0173539.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验