• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:成本和围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: A systematic review and meta-analysis on costs and perioperative outcome.

机构信息

HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.

General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2021 Oct;17(5):e2295. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2295. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.2295
PMID:34085371
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare perioperative outcomes and costs of robotic and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (RDP and LDP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science for reports published before December 2020.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 11 papers (1 187 patients). RDP showed a lower conversion rate (odds ratio: 2.56, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.31 to 5.00) with no significant differences in bleeding and operative time, complications ≥ Clavien-Dindo grade III, pancreatic fistulas and length of stay. Despite RDP presenting higher costs in all included studies, none of these differences were significant. However, RDP showed higher total costs than LDP (standardized mean differences [SMD]: -1.18, 95% CI: -1.97 to -0.39). A subgroup analysis according to the continent of origin showed that studies coming from Asian research groups kept showing significant differences (SMD: -2.62, 95% CI: -3.38 to -1.85), while Western groups did not confirm these findings.

CONCLUSION

Based on low-quality evidence, despite some potential technical advantages, RDP still seems to be costlier than LDP.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析旨在比较机器人辅助和腹腔镜辅助远端胰腺切除术(RDP 和 LDP)的围手术期结果和成本。

材料与方法

根据 PRISMA 指南,我们检索了 Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane 和 Web of Science 数据库,以获取截至 2020 年 12 月之前发表的报告。

结果

文献检索共确定了 11 篇文献(1187 例患者)。RDP 的转换率较低(比值比:2.56,95%置信区间[CI]:1.31 至 5.00),但在出血和手术时间、≥Clavien-Dindo 分级 III 的并发症、胰瘘和住院时间方面无显著差异。尽管所有纳入的研究均显示 RDP 的成本更高,但这些差异均无统计学意义。然而,RDP 的总费用高于 LDP(标准化均数差值[SMD]:-1.18,95%CI:-1.97 至 -0.39)。根据起源洲的亚组分析显示,来自亚洲研究小组的研究仍显示出显著差异(SMD:-2.62,95%CI:-3.38 至 -1.85),而西方研究小组则未证实这些发现。

结论

基于低质量证据,尽管 RDP 具有一些潜在的技术优势,但与 LDP 相比,RDP 似乎仍然更昂贵。

相似文献

1
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: A systematic review and meta-analysis on costs and perioperative outcome.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:成本和围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Oct;17(5):e2295. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2295. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
2
Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review.腹腔镜和机器人胰腺切除术的学习曲线:系统评价。
Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):194-206. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.046. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术老年患者术后认知结局:静脉麻醉维持与吸入麻醉维持的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2.
4
Fibrin sealants for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatic surgery.用于预防胰腺手术后胰瘘的纤维蛋白密封剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 23;6(6):CD009621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009621.pub3.
5
Robotic vs laparoscopic approaches of pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗胰腺切除术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 16;19(1):295. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02446-7.
6
Oxycodone for cancer-related pain.羟考酮治疗癌性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 9;6(6):CD003870. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003870.pub7.
7
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术预防性腹部引流。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 18;12(12):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub5.
8
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
9
Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19: Equity-related analyses and update on evidence.全身性皮质类固醇治疗 COVID-19:与公平相关的分析和证据更新。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD014963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014963.pub2.
10
Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults.成人围手术期持续静脉输注利多卡因用于术后疼痛及恢复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival Study: International Multicentric Pancreatic Left Resections (SIMPLR-2): Does Surgical Approach Matter for Recurrence-Free Survival and Overall Survival?生存研究:国际多中心胰腺左半切除术(SIMPLR - 2):手术方式对无复发生存率和总生存率有影响吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;17(16):2659. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162659.
2
Clinical effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic and open surgery: an overview of systematic reviews.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术和开放手术的临床疗效:系统评价概述
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 16;14(9):e076750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076750.
3
Study International Multicentric Pancreatic Left Resections (SIMPLR): Does Surgical Approach Matter?
国际多中心胰腺左半切除术研究(SIMPLR):手术方式重要吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 5;16(5):1051. doi: 10.3390/cancers16051051.
4
International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023.《2023年机器人胰腺手术国际共识指南》
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):89-104. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-132. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
5
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases.与腹腔镜技术相比,机器人远端胰腺切除术的效果更佳:一位外科医生连续123例手术的经验。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;15(22):5492. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225492.
6
State-of-the-Art and Upcoming Innovations in Pancreatic Cancer Care: A Step Forward to Precision Medicine.胰腺癌治疗的最新进展与未来创新:向精准医学迈进的一步
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;15(13):3423. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133423.
7
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:一项包括患者亚组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4131-4143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09894-y. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
8
Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections.600 例微创胰腺和肝脏切除术中从腹腔镜手术转为机器人手术的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2659-2672. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09735-4. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Different Surgical Procedures: Protocol for a Prospective, Multicentric Study (ROBOCOSTES).机器人手术与腹腔镜手术用于不同外科手术的成本效益:一项前瞻性多中心研究(ROBOCOSTES)方案
Front Surg. 2022 May 6;9:866041. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.866041. eCollection 2022.
10
Utility of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia Following Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后机器人辅助腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的效用
In Vivo. 2022 May-Jun;36(3):1432-1437. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12848.