• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术与腹腔镜手术用于不同外科手术的成本效益:一项前瞻性多中心研究(ROBOCOSTES)方案

Cost-Effectiveness of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Different Surgical Procedures: Protocol for a Prospective, Multicentric Study (ROBOCOSTES).

作者信息

Ielpo Benedetto, Podda Mauro, Burdio Fernando, Sanchez-Velazquez Patricia, Guerrero Maria-Alejandra, Nuñez Javier, Toledano Miguel, Morales-Conde Salvador, Mayol Julio, Lopez-Cano Manuel, Espín-Basany Eloy, Pellino Gianluca

机构信息

Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Surgical Science, Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2022 May 6;9:866041. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.866041. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.866041
PMID:36227017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9549953/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The studies which address the impact of costs of robotic vs. laparoscopic approach on quality of life (cost-effectiveness studies) are scares in general surgery.

METHODS

The Spanish national study on cost-effectiveness differences among robotic and laparoscopic surgery (ROBOCOSTES) is designed as a prospective, multicentre, national, observational study. The aim is to determine in which procedures robotic surgery is more cost-effective than laparoscopic surgery. Several surgical operations and patient populations will be evaluated (distal pancreatectomy, gastrectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, inguinal hernioplasty, rectal resection for cancer, Heller cardiomiotomy and Nissen procedure).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will demonstrate which treatment (laparoscopic or robotic) and in which population is more cost-effective. This study will also assess the impact of previous surgical experience on main outcomes.

摘要

背景

探讨机器人手术与腹腔镜手术成本对生活质量影响的研究(成本效益研究)在普通外科领域较为少见。

方法

西班牙关于机器人手术与腹腔镜手术成本效益差异的全国性研究(ROBOCOSTES)设计为一项前瞻性、多中心、全国性观察性研究。目的是确定机器人手术在哪些手术中比腹腔镜手术更具成本效益。将评估多种外科手术及患者群体(胰体尾切除术、胃切除术、袖状胃切除术、腹股沟疝修补术、直肠癌切除术、贲门肌切开术和nissen手术)。

讨论

本研究结果将表明哪种治疗方式(腹腔镜或机器人手术)以及在哪些人群中更具成本效益。本研究还将评估既往手术经验对主要结局的影响。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Different Surgical Procedures: Protocol for a Prospective, Multicentric Study (ROBOCOSTES).机器人手术与腹腔镜手术用于不同外科手术的成本效益:一项前瞻性多中心研究(ROBOCOSTES)方案
Front Surg. 2022 May 6;9:866041. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.866041. eCollection 2022.
2
Cost-effectiveness of robotic vs laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Results from the national prospective trial ROBOCOSTES.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助胰体尾切除术的成本效益比较。ROBOCOSTES 全国前瞻性试验结果。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6270-6281. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11109-x. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative cost-effectiveness study.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的成本效果比较研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Mar;24(3):247-254. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02151-7. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
4
Utilization and outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic general and bariatric surgical procedures at Academic Medical Centers.学术医疗中心腹腔镜与机器人普通及减重外科手术的应用情况与疗效
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1729-36. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3886-y. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
5
Cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.腹腔镜和机器人胰体尾切除术的成本效益和生活质量分析:倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1420-1428. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07528-1. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
6
Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗胃腺癌的多中心前瞻性对照研究
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):103-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001249.
7
8
A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.一项基于人群的比较结直肠手术中腹腔镜手术与机器人手术结果的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):455-463. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4218-6. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
9
Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Minimally Invasive Colectomy.腹腔镜与机器人微创结直肠切除术的成本效果评价。
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):334-341. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003196.
10
Robotic-assisted gastrectomy compared with open resection: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis.机器人辅助胃切除术与开放切除术的比较:临床结局的对比研究及成本效益分析
J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):627-632. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01033-x. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comment on "Evaluating robotic and laparoscopic approaches for left and right colon carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.对“评估机器人手术和腹腔镜手术治疗左、右结肠癌:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析”的评论
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 21;19(1):502. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02669-8.
2
Evaluating robotic and laparoscopic approaches for left and right colon carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.评估机器人手术和腹腔镜手术治疗左、右结肠癌的效果:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 25;19(1):419. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02600-1.
3
Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的手术效果比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 27;19(1):177. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02358-6.
4
A Comprehensive Review on Comparative Analysis of Operative Efficiency and Postoperative Recovery in Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肝切除术的手术效率及术后恢复对比分析综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 20;16(8):e67262. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67262. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Surgery vs. Open Surgery for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.机器人手术与开放手术治疗肝门部胆管癌的疗效与安全性:一项综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 13;16(8):e66790. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66790. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Cost-effectiveness of robotic vs laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Results from the national prospective trial ROBOCOSTES.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助胰体尾切除术的成本效益比较。ROBOCOSTES 全国前瞻性试验结果。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6270-6281. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11109-x. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
7
Surgical Frontiers: A Comparative Review of Robotics Versus Laparoscopy in Gynecological Interventions.手术前沿:妇科手术中机器人手术与腹腔镜手术的比较综述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 30;15(11):e49752. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49752. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
A cost analysis of robotic vs. video-assisted thoracic surgery: The impact of the learning curve and the COVID-19 pandemic.机器人辅助与电视胸腔镜手术的成本分析:学习曲线和新冠疫情的影响
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 25;10:1123329. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123329. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Evolving Economics of Implementation.实施过程中不断演变的经济学
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Aug;31(8):555-557. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014411. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.机器人结直肠手术与腹腔镜结直肠手术的学习曲线:一项系统综述。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;23(11):2806-2820. doi: 10.1111/codi.15843. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: A systematic review and meta-analysis on costs and perioperative outcome.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:成本和围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Oct;17(5):e2295. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2295. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
4
Evaluation of cost-effectiveness among open, laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.开腹、腹腔镜和机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术的成本效益评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2021 Sep;222(3):513-520. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.066. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
5
Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜碎石取石术与输尿管软镜碎石术治疗肾结石的成本效果分析:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jun;22(4):585-604. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01277-1. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
6
Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review.腹腔镜和机器人胰腺切除术的学习曲线:系统评价。
Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):194-206. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.046. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Minimally Invasive Colectomy.腹腔镜与机器人微创结直肠切除术的成本效果评价。
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):334-341. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003196.
8
Robotic-assisted right colectomy versus laparoscopic approach: case-matched study and cost-effectiveness analysis.机器人辅助右半结肠切除术与腹腔镜手术方法:病例匹配研究及成本效益分析
J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01084-5. Epub 2020 May 4.
9
A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.机器人手术、腹腔镜手术与开腹肝切除术的比较:系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1214-1224. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.227. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
10
Cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.腹腔镜和机器人胰体尾切除术的成本效益和生活质量分析:倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1420-1428. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07528-1. Epub 2020 Apr 2.