Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 15;204(6):632-641. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202102-0417CI.
Oxygen supplementation is one of the most common interventions in critically ill patients. Despite over a century of data suggesting both beneficial and detrimental effects of supplemental oxygen, optimal arterial oxygenation targets in adult patients remain unclear. Laboratory animal studies have consistently showed that exposure to a high Fi causes respiratory failure and early death. Human autopsy studies from the 1960s purported to provide histologic evidence of pulmonary oxygen toxicity in the form of diffuse alveolar damage. However, concomitant ventilator-induced lung injury and/or other causes of acute lung injury may explain these findings. Although some observational studies in general populations of critically adults showed higher mortality in association with higher oxygen exposures, this finding has not been consistent. For some specific populations, such as those with cardiac arrest, studies have suggested harm from targeting supraphysiologic Pa levels. More recently, randomized clinical trials of arterial oxygenation targets in narrower physiologic ranges were conducted in critically ill adult patients. Although two smaller trials came to opposite conclusions, the two largest of these trials showed no differences in clinical outcomes in study groups that received conservative versus liberal oxygen targets, suggesting that either strategy is reasonable. It is possible that some strategies are of benefit in some subpopulations, and this remains an important ongoing area of research. Because of the ubiquity of oxygen supplementation in critically ill adults, even small treatment effects could have a large impact on a global scale.
氧疗是危重症患者最常用的干预措施之一。尽管一个多世纪以来的数据表明补充氧气既有有益的影响,也有有害的影响,但成人患者的最佳动脉氧合目标仍不清楚。实验室动物研究一直表明,暴露于高 Fi 会导致呼吸衰竭和早期死亡。20 世纪 60 年代的人体解剖研究据称提供了肺部氧毒性的组织学证据,表现为弥漫性肺泡损伤。然而,同时存在的呼吸机引起的肺损伤和/或其他急性肺损伤的原因可能解释了这些发现。尽管一些针对危重症成年人一般人群的观察性研究表明,较高的氧暴露与较高的死亡率相关,但这一发现并不一致。对于一些特定人群,如心脏骤停患者,研究表明靶向超生理 Pa 水平会造成伤害。最近,在危重症成年患者中进行了更窄生理范围内的动脉氧合目标的随机临床试验。尽管两项较小的试验得出了相反的结论,但这两项最大的试验表明,接受保守与宽松氧目标治疗的研究组在临床结局方面没有差异,这表明两种策略都是合理的。某些策略可能对某些亚人群有益,这仍然是一个重要的研究领域。由于危重症成年人普遍接受氧疗,即使是很小的治疗效果也可能对全球范围产生重大影响。