• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A hybrid model of acute unscheduled cancer care provided by a hospital-based acute care clinic and the emergency department: a descriptive study.医院急性护理诊所和急诊科联合提供的急性非计划性癌症护理的混合模式:一项描述性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7479-7485. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06327-1. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
2
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.
3
Lack of gender disparities in emergency department triage of acute stroke patients.急性中风患者在急诊科分诊中不存在性别差异。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):203-9. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.11.23063. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
4
The Emergency Severity Index (version 3) 5-level triage system scores predict ED resource consumption.急诊严重程度指数(第3版)5级分诊系统评分可预测急诊科资源消耗。
J Emerg Nurs. 2004 Feb;30(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2003.11.004.
5
Validation of the Emergency Severity Index (Version 4) for the Triage of Adult Emergency Department Patients With Active Cancer.成人急诊癌症患者分诊的急诊严重程度指数(第4版)验证
J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;57(3):354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
6
Assessment of ED triage of anaphylaxis patients based on the Emergency Severity Index.基于急诊严重程度指数评估过敏性反应患者的 ED 分诊。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:449-455. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.057. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
7
Accuracy of the Emergency Severity Index triage instrument for identifying elder emergency department patients receiving an immediate life-saving intervention.急危重症评分工具用于识别急诊科接受即刻救命干预的老年患者的准确性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;17(3):238-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00670.x.
8
Reliability and validity of scores on The Emergency Severity Index version 3.《急诊严重程度指数第3版》评分的可靠性与有效性
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):59-65. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.06.013.
9
[Outpatient care in emergency departments and primary care services : A descriptive analysis of secondary data in a rural hospital].[急诊科和基层医疗服务中的门诊护理:一家乡村医院二次数据的描述性分析]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2017 Sep;112(6):510-518. doi: 10.1007/s00063-016-0233-1. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
10
Decreasing length of stay in the emergency department with a split emergency severity index 3 patient flow model.采用分段式 3 级急诊严重指数患者流程模型缩短急诊科住院时间。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;20(11):1171-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12249.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of Non-Emergent Cancer-Related Emergency Department Visits in Korea between 2016 and 2020.2016 年至 2020 年韩国非紧急癌症相关急诊科就诊的流行病学研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2024 Jul;65(7):418-426. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0338.
2
Retrospective study of cancer patients' predictive factors of care in a large, Hungarian tertiary care centre.回顾性研究大型匈牙利三级护理中心癌症患者的护理预测因素。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 8;13(5):e070320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070320.
3
Cancer-related emergency and urgent care: expanding the research agenda.癌症相关急症与紧急护理:拓展研究议程
Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00005-6. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Chief complaints of patients with cancer who visit the emergency department over their oncologist's outpatient clinic in South Korea.韩国癌症患者在急诊室就诊的主要抱怨是他们的肿瘤学家门诊。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Apr 21;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00946-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care.新冠疫情对癌症护理的影响。
Nat Cancer. 2020 Jun;1(6):565-567. doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-0074-y.
2
Emerging challenges in the evaluation of fever in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia in the era of COVID-19: a MASCC position paper.在 COVID-19 时代,癌症患者发热风险伴发热性中性粒细胞减少评估中的新挑战:MASCC 立场文件。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb;29(2):1129-1138. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05906-y. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
3
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Care: A Global Collaborative Study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对癌症护理的影响:一项全球合作研究。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Sep;6:1428-1438. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00351.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Department Visits - United States, January 1, 2019-May 30, 2020.COVID-19 大流行对急诊就诊的影响-美国,2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 30 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 12;69(23):699-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1.
5
Ambulatory emergency oncology: A key tenet of future emergency oncology care.门诊肿瘤急症学:未来肿瘤急症医疗的关键原则。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Jan;74(1):e13436. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13436. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
6
Validation of the Emergency Severity Index (Version 4) for the Triage of Adult Emergency Department Patients With Active Cancer.成人急诊癌症患者分诊的急诊严重程度指数(第4版)验证
J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;57(3):354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Analysis of Diagnoses, Symptoms, Medications, and Admissions Among Patients With Cancer Presenting to Emergency Departments.癌症患者就诊于急诊科的诊断、症状、药物和住院情况分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190979. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0979.
8
The Cancer Emergency Department-The Ohio State University James Cancer Center Experience.癌症急诊科——俄亥俄州立大学詹姆斯癌症中心的经验
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2018 Aug;36(3):631-636. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2018.04.012.
9
A novel approach to improving ambulatory outpatient management of low risk febrile neutropenia: an Enhanced Supportive Care (ESC) clinic.一种改善低危发热性中性粒细胞减少症门诊管理的新方法:强化支持治疗(ESC)门诊。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):2937-2940. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4194-1. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
10
Best Practices for Reducing Unplanned Acute Care for Patients With Cancer.降低癌症患者非计划性急性护理的最佳实践。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 May;14(5):306-313. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00081. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

医院急性护理诊所和急诊科联合提供的急性非计划性癌症护理的混合模式:一项描述性研究。

A hybrid model of acute unscheduled cancer care provided by a hospital-based acute care clinic and the emergency department: a descriptive study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 760 Prior Hall, 376 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7479-7485. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06327-1. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-021-06327-1
PMID:34089356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8178031/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with cancer often experience medical events that require immediate evaluation. These evaluations typically occur in an emergency department (ED), but there is increasing interest in providing this care in other settings. We report on a novel care model whereby a nursing hotline is used to triage patients to the ED or to the North Carolina Cancer Hospital Infusion Center (NCCHIC).

METHODS

A retrospective study of adult patients with a neoplasm diagnosis seeking acute care at a large academic hospital pre- and post-initiation of the novel care model in January of 2016. Patients were identified by querying the electronic medical record and clinic administrative data during matched 6 month pre- and post-periods.

RESULTS

During the pre-initiation period, 1346 patients visited the ED on 1651 occasions (76.1% admission rate). In the post-initiation period, 1434 patients visited the ED on 1797 occasions (81.5% admission rate), and 246 patients visited the NCCHIC on 322 occasions (68.9% admission rate). The emergency severity index (ESI) in the pre-initiation ED group was primarily ESI 2 (30.6%) and ESI 3 (65.4%). In the post-initiation ED group, the ESI was similar (32.6% ESI 2 and 64.2% ESI 3). In contrast, the NCCHIC predominantly treated lower acuity patients (65.8% calculated ESI of 4/5).

CONCLUSIONS

This model demonstrates a multidisciplinary partnership to providing acute unscheduled care for patients with cancer. In the early implementation phase of this model, approximately 15% of patients, generally of lower acuity, were seen in the NCCHIC.

摘要

目的

癌症患者常经历需要立即评估的医疗事件。这些评估通常在急诊部(ED)进行,但人们越来越关注在其他环境中提供这种护理。我们报告了一种新的护理模式,即通过护理热线将患者分诊到 ED 或北卡罗来纳癌症医院输液中心(NCCHIC)。

方法

对 2016 年 1 月新护理模式启动前后在一家大型学术医院寻求急性护理的成年肿瘤患者进行回顾性研究。通过在匹配的 6 个月前和后期间查询电子病历和诊所行政数据来识别患者。

结果

在启动前期间,1346 名患者在 1651 次就诊中前往 ED(入院率为 76.1%)。在启动后期间,1434 名患者在 1797 次就诊中前往 ED(入院率为 81.5%),246 名患者在 322 次就诊中前往 NCCHIC(入院率为 68.9%)。启动前 ED 组的紧急严重程度指数(ESI)主要为 ESI 2(30.6%)和 ESI 3(65.4%)。在启动后的 ED 组中,ESI 相似(ESI 2 占 32.6%,ESI 3 占 64.2%)。相比之下,NCCHIC 主要治疗低危患者(65.8%的计算 ESI 为 4/5)。

结论

该模型展示了一种多学科合作模式,为癌症患者提供急性非计划护理。在该模型的早期实施阶段,约 15%的患者,通常为低危患者,在 NCCHIC 就诊。