The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen O 2100, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Kildegaardsvej 28, Hellerup 2900, Denmark.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022 Apr 9;21(3):261-270. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab047.
Infective endocarditis is a complex and highly mortal disease requiring lengthy treatment. Physical and mental deconditioning is common. Nonetheless, rehabilitation is virtually unexplored in this population. The aim of this trial was therefore to investigate the effects of cardiac rehabilitation in patients following endocarditis.
In a randomized trial, adults with left-sided or cardiac device endocarditis were randomized 1:1 to 12 weeks of physical exercise training and five psycho-educational consultations (cardiac rehabilitation) vs. usual care without rehabilitation (control). Primary outcome was mental health measured by SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) at 6 months. Secondary outcome was physical capacity measured by peak oxygen uptake (VO2) at 4 months. Exploratory outcomes were investigated. Low inclusion rate resulted in trial termination before reaching the target sample size. A total of 117 participants (mean age: 60 years, 81% male) were randomized to cardiac rehabilitation (n = 58) or to control (n = 59). Mental health and physical capacity at baseline were generally poor (MCS: 38.9-42.2 points, VO2 peak: 16.1-16.6 mL/kg/min). Cardiac rehabilitation compared with control showed no effect on mental health (MCS: 44.6 points vs. 48.8 points, P = 0.41) or physical capacity (VO2 peak: 19.9 mL/kg/min vs. 18.0 mL/kg/min, P = 0.09). Effects favouring the intervention were identified in exploratory outcomes including general fatigue (P = 0.005), and physical capacity as maximal power (W) (P = 0.005). Adherence to the intervention was 28%.
Results indicate no effect of cardiac rehabilitation in patients following endocarditis; however, lack of statistical power and poor adherence render findings inconclusive. Valuable insight into patients' capabilities and safety was gained, and further investigations into rehabilitation needs and modes of delivery in this high-need population should be a future priority.
The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01512615.
感染性心内膜炎是一种复杂且病死率高的疾病,需要进行长时间的治疗。患者常出现体力和精神上的衰弱。然而,该人群的康复治疗几乎未被研究过。因此,本试验旨在研究心脏康复对心内膜炎患者的影响。
在一项随机试验中,患有左侧或心内器械性心内膜炎的成年人按照 1:1 的比例随机分配至 12 周的体育锻炼训练和 5 次心理教育咨询(心脏康复)组或不进行康复治疗的常规护理(对照组)。主要结局是 6 个月时采用 SF-36 心理健康量表(MCS)评估的心理健康情况。次要结局是 4 个月时采用峰值摄氧量(VO2)评估的身体能力。同时还进行了探索性结局的评估。由于低入组率,试验在达到目标样本量之前提前终止。共纳入 117 名参与者(平均年龄:60 岁,81%为男性),随机分配至心脏康复组(n=58)或对照组(n=59)。基线时心理健康和身体能力普遍较差(MCS:38.9-42.2 分,VO2 峰值:16.1-16.6 mL/kg/min)。与对照组相比,心脏康复组对心理健康(MCS:44.6 分比 48.8 分,P=0.41)或身体能力(VO2 峰值:19.9 mL/kg/min 比 18.0 mL/kg/min,P=0.09)均无显著影响。在包括一般疲劳(P=0.005)和最大功率(W)等身体能力的探索性结局中观察到有利于干预的效果(P=0.005)。干预的依从率为 28%。
结果表明,心脏康复对心内膜炎患者无显著影响;然而,由于缺乏统计学效力和较差的依从性,结果尚不确定。本研究为该高需求人群的康复需求和实施模式提供了宝贵的见解,未来应优先考虑进一步研究。
本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT01512615。