• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全凭静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对腹腔镜下全子宫切除术患者术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effect of total intravenous anesthesia or inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, 209 Tongshan, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China; Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, No.99 Huaihai West Road, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, 209 Tongshan, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China; Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, No.99 Huaihai West Road, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2021 Oct;73:110374. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110374. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110374
PMID:34090183
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

An operating room, a postoperative recovery area, and a hospital ward.

PATIENTS

A total of 102 female patients scheduled for elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly divided into two groups: the propofol group (group P) or sevoflurane group (group S).

INTERVENTIONS

Anesthesia in group P was induced by propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium, and maintained by intravenous infusion of propofol and remifentanil. Anesthesia in group S was induced by a tidal volume inhalation technique with sevoflurane and rocuronium and maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil. Patients in group P did not receive any volatile drugs.

MEASUREMENTS

Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores were assessed at 8, 24, 48, 72 h, 7 days and 30 days after surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative inflammatory indicators and adverse reactions were also recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

The QoR-40 score and its 5 dimensions were similar in the two groups at each point in time (P > 0.05). Group S had less consumption of remifentanil (P < 0.001) but increased use of phenylephrine (P = 0.001) intraoperatively. PSQI scores were also comparable between groups at each point in time (P > 0.05). NRS scores at 72 h (P = 0.023) and 7 days (P = 0.017) after surgery, postoperative NLR (P = 0.024) and hs-CRP (P = 0.042), and the incidence of abdominal distension (P = 0.017) were significantly lower in group P than in group S. Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that duration of pneumoperitoneum and sleep quality were associated with postoperative recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of intravenous or inhalation maintenance anesthesia did not affect overall postoperative recovery as measured by the QoR-40 in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Reducing the duration of pneumoperitoneum and improving sleep quality were conducive to postoperative recovery.

摘要

研究目的

探讨丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉(TIVA)或七氟醚吸入麻醉对腹腔镜全子宫切除术患者术后恢复质量的影响。

设计

前瞻性随机对照试验。

地点

手术室、恢复区和病房。

患者

102 名择期行腹腔镜全子宫切除术的女性患者,随机分为两组:丙泊酚组(P 组)或七氟醚组(S 组)。

干预措施

P 组麻醉诱导用丙泊酚、芬太尼和罗库溴铵,静脉输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼维持麻醉。S 组麻醉诱导采用七氟醚潮气量吸入技术和罗库溴铵,七氟醚和瑞芬太尼维持麻醉。P 组患者不使用任何挥发性药物。

测量

术后 8、24、48、72 小时、7 天和 30 天,采用质量恢复量表 40 项(QoR-40)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和数字评分量表(NRS)评分进行评估。还记录了术中血流动力学、术后炎症指标和不良反应。

主要结果

两组患者在各个时间点的 QoR-40 评分及其 5 个维度均相似(P>0.05)。S 组术中瑞芬太尼用量减少(P<0.001),但苯肾上腺素用量增加(P=0.001)。两组患者在各个时间点的 PSQI 评分也相似(P>0.05)。术后 72 小时(P=0.023)和 7 天(P=0.017)NRS 评分、术后 NLR(P=0.024)和 hs-CRP(P=0.042)、腹胀发生率(P=0.017)均显著低于 S 组。多线性回归分析表明,气腹时间和睡眠质量与术后恢复有关。

结论

在腹腔镜全子宫切除术患者中,选择静脉或吸入维持麻醉并不影响 QoR-40 评估的整体术后恢复。减少气腹时间和改善睡眠质量有助于术后恢复。

相似文献

1
Effect of total intravenous anesthesia or inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial.全凭静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对腹腔镜下全子宫切除术患者术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Oct;73:110374. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110374. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
2
[TIVA with propofol-remifentanil or balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-fentanyl in laparoscopic operations. Hemodynamics, awakening and adverse effects].[腹腔镜手术中丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼靶控输注麻醉与七氟醚-芬太尼平衡麻醉。血流动力学、苏醒及不良反应]
Anaesthesist. 1999 Nov;48(11):807-12. doi: 10.1007/s001010050789.
3
Fast-track anesthesia in patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of sevoflurane with total intravenous anesthesia.在接受门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中进行快速通道麻醉:七氟醚与全静脉麻醉的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.036. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
4
A randomized controlled trial of propofol-remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia on early postoperative fatigue in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.一项关于异丙酚-瑞芬太尼全静脉麻醉和七氟醚-芬太尼麻醉对腹腔镜结直肠手术患者术后早期疲劳的随机对照试验。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jan;33(1):241-252. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03510-1. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
5
[Propofol-remifentanil versus sevoflurane-remifentanil for anesthesia for pediatric procedures in infants, children and adolescents].丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼与七氟醚-瑞芬太尼用于婴幼儿、儿童及青少年儿科手术麻醉的比较
Anaesthesist. 2001 Oct;50(10):757-66. doi: 10.1007/s001010100207.
6
No difference in emergence time and early cognitive function between sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery.幕上颅内手术开颅患者中,七氟醚-芬太尼与丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼在苏醒时间和早期认知功能方面无差异。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Jul;17(3):134-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000167447.33969.16.
7
A comparison between inhalational (Desflurane) and total intravenous anaesthesia (Propofol and dexmedetomidine) in improving postoperative recovery for morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A double-blinded randomised controlled trial.吸入麻醉(地氟醚)与全静脉麻醉(丙泊酚和右美托咪定)在改善病态肥胖患者行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后恢复的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2018 Mar;45:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
A multicentre, randomised, open-label, controlled trial evaluating equivalence of inhalational and intravenous anaesthesia during elective craniotomy.一项多中心、随机、开放标签、对照试验,评估在择期开颅术中吸入麻醉与静脉麻醉的等效性。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Aug;29(8):371-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835422db.
9
Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia.全麻与椎管内麻醉对男性腰椎手术患者术后转归的影响:一项比较丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉与七氟醚麻醉的随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec 1;21(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01519-y.
10
Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric outpatient surgery.小儿门诊手术的静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 7;2014(2):CD009015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009015.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalation anaesthesia on gastrointestinal function recovery after laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomised controlled trial.全凭静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对腹腔镜子宫切除术后胃肠功能恢复的影响:一项随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Sep;69(9):909-917. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_105_25. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
2
Effect of low-dose esketamine on postoperative quality of recovery in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.低剂量艾司氯胺酮对全腹腔镜子宫切除术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照试验
Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Jul 23;14(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00567-z.
3
[Esketamine Alleviates Postoperative Depressive Symptoms in Frail Elderly Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Radical Resection of Lung Cancer: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial].
艾司氯胺酮减轻老年体弱肺癌患者胸腔镜根治性切除术后抑郁症状:一项随机双盲对照试验
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Mar 20;56(2):506-513. doi: 10.12182/20250360202.
4
Efficacy and safety of esketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation in ICU patients: a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.艾氯胺酮用于ICU患者紧急气管插管的有效性和安全性:一项双盲、随机对照临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 19;15(1):6089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91016-w.
5
Effects of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Internal Branch of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block on Postoperative Sore Throat and Hemodynamics in Patients With Double-Lumen Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.右美托咪定作为术前超声引导下喉上神经内支阻滞辅助用药对双腔气管插管患者术后咽痛及血流动力学的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Pain Res. 2025 Jan 17;18:229-241. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S498538. eCollection 2025.
6
Postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracotomy: A comparison between total intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia.开胸手术患者的术后镇痛:全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉的比较
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Nov;40(10):2219-2222. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.10.9907.
7
Comparing subjective quality of recovery between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for surgical procedures: a meta-analysis.比较瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚全静脉麻醉在手术中的术后恢复主观质量:一项荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 17;13(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02660-8.
8
The impact of inhalation versus total intravenous anesthesia on the immune status in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a double-blind randomized clinical trial (TeMP).吸入麻醉与全静脉麻醉对乳腺癌手术患者免疫状态的影响:一项双盲随机临床试验(TeMP)
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 26;14:1401910. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1401910. eCollection 2024.
9
Effect of Rectus Sheath Block on Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Transabdominal Midline Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.腹直肌鞘阻滞对经腹中线妇科手术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 17;17:2155-2163. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S460367. eCollection 2024.
10
Comparison of combined intravenous and inhalation anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery and the identification of predictive factors influencing the delayed recovery of neurocognitive function.腹腔镜手术中静脉与吸入复合麻醉和全静脉麻醉的比较以及影响神经认知功能延迟恢复的预测因素识别
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 25;11:1353502. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1353502. eCollection 2024.