• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童的阅读能力与跨模态的节奏感知有关。

Reading ability in children relates to rhythm perception across modalities.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Oct;210:105196. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105196. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105196
PMID:34090237
Abstract

The onset of reading ability is rife with individual differences, with some children termed "early readers" and some falling behind from the very beginning. Reading skill in children has been linked to an ability to remember nonverbal rhythms, specifically in the auditory modality. It has been hypothesized that the link between rhythm skills and reading reflects a shared reliance on the ability to extract temporal structure from sound. Here we tested this hypothesis by investigating whether the link between rhythm memory and reading depends on the modality in which rhythms are presented. We tested 75 primary school-aged children aged 7-11 years on a within-participants battery of reading and rhythm tasks. Participants received a reading efficiency task followed by three rhythm tasks (auditory, visual, and audiovisual). Results showed that children who performed poorly on the reading task also performed poorly on the tasks that required them to remember and repeat back nonverbal rhythms. In addition, these children showed a rhythmic deficit not just in the auditory domain but also in the visual domain. However, auditory rhythm memory explained additional variance in reading ability even after controlling for visual memory. These results suggest that reading ability and rhythm memory rely both on shared modality-general cognitive processes and on the ability to perceive the temporal structure of sound.

摘要

阅读能力的发展存在个体差异,有些儿童被称为“早期阅读者”,而有些儿童则从一开始就落后。儿童的阅读技能与记忆非言语节奏的能力有关,特别是在听觉模式中。有人假设,节奏技能与阅读之间的联系反映了对从声音中提取时间结构的能力的共同依赖。在这里,我们通过研究节奏记忆与阅读之间的联系是否取决于呈现节奏的模态来检验这一假设。我们在一个参与者内部的阅读和节奏任务电池上测试了 75 名 7-11 岁的小学生。参与者接受了一项阅读效率任务,然后进行了三项节奏任务(听觉、视觉和视听)。结果表明,在阅读任务中表现不佳的儿童在需要他们记忆和重复非言语节奏的任务中表现也不佳。此外,这些儿童不仅在听觉领域,而且在视觉领域都表现出节奏缺陷。然而,即使在控制了视觉记忆之后,听觉节奏记忆也能解释阅读能力的额外差异。这些结果表明,阅读能力和节奏记忆既依赖于共享的模态一般认知过程,也依赖于感知声音时间结构的能力。

相似文献

1
Reading ability in children relates to rhythm perception across modalities.儿童的阅读能力与跨模态的节奏感知有关。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Oct;210:105196. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105196. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
2
Individual Differences in Rhythm Skills: Links with Neural Consistency and Linguistic Ability.节奏技能的个体差异:与神经一致性和语言能力的关联。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 May;29(5):855-868. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01092. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
3
Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.认知能力有助于听力障碍儿童的声谱-时谱辨别。
Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):645-650. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000645.
4
Working memory, short-term memory and reading proficiency in school-age children with cochlear implants.人工耳蜗植入学龄儿童的工作记忆、短期记忆与阅读能力
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Oct;79(10):1647-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
5
Investigating Auditory Spectral and Temporal Resolution Deficits in Children with Reading Difficulties.探究阅读困难儿童的听觉频谱和时间分辨率缺陷
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Jun;30(6):533-543. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17142. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
Subcortical processing of speech regularities underlies reading and music aptitude in children.皮层下的言语规律加工是儿童阅读和音乐能力的基础。
Behav Brain Funct. 2011 Oct 17;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-7-44.
7
Audiovisual beat induction in complex auditory rhythms: point-light figure movement as an effective visual beat.复杂听觉节奏中的视听节拍诱导:光点图形运动作为一种有效的视觉节拍
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Sep;151:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
8
Modality-specific frequency band activity during neural entrainment to auditory and visual rhythms.神经跟随听觉和视觉节奏时特定模态的频带活动。
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Jul;54(2):4649-4669. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15314. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
9
Reading ability reflects individual differences in auditory brainstem function, even into adulthood.阅读能力反映了听觉脑干功能的个体差异,即使在成年期也是如此。
Brain Lang. 2017 Jan;164:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
10
See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms.听见我所听?在听觉和视觉节奏中感知节拍。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jul;220(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3114-8. Epub 2012 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Is It About Speech or About Prediction? Testing Between Two Accounts of the Rhythm-Reading Link.这是关于言语还是预测?对节奏阅读联系的两种解释进行检验。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jun 14;15(6):642. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15060642.
2
Prosodic features in production reflect reading comprehension skill in high school students.朗读时的韵律特征反映了高中生的阅读理解能力。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Oct;50(10):1662-1682. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001355. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
3
Duration Perception and Reading in Typically Developing Adults and Adults with Developmental Dyslexia: Implications for Assessment and Intervention.
发育正常的成年人与患有发育性阅读障碍的成年人的时长感知与阅读:对评估和干预的启示
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):699-708. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14030046.
4
The relation between rhythm processing and cognitive abilities during child development: The role of prediction.儿童发育过程中节奏处理与认知能力之间的关系:预测的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:920513. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920513. eCollection 2022.
5
Identifying a brain network for musical rhythm: A functional neuroimaging meta-analysis and systematic review.识别音乐节奏的脑网络:一项功能神经影像学的荟萃分析与系统评价。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 May;136:104588. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104588. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
6
Towards a Comprehensive Account of Rhythm Processing Issues in Developmental Dyslexia.迈向对发展性阅读障碍中节奏处理问题的全面阐释
Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 30;11(10):1303. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101303.