• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良 Latarjet 术治疗复发性肩关节不稳定的临床疗效及重返运动活动情况。

Clinical outcome and return to sports activity after surgical treatment for recurrent shoulder instability with a modified Latarjet procedure.

机构信息

Section of Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Halle, Ernst-Grube-Str, 40, 06120 Halle Saale, Germany; Department of Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken Bergmannstrost, Merseburger Str,. 165, 06112 Halle Saale, Germany.

Department of Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken Bergmannstrost, Merseburger Str,. 165, 06112 Halle Saale, Germany; Department of Trauma-, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Sep;107(5):102977. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102977. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102977
PMID:34091084
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Latarjet procedure is an attractive surgical option for the management of chronic anterior shoulder instability. The original surgical approach involves the vertical tenotomy of the subscapularis tendon. Alternatively, the subscapularis muscle is split longitudinally and the tendon left attached at the lesser tuberosity.

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis is that the longitudinal split is of functional advantage and may lead to better functional results and earlier return to sports activities compared to the vertical tenotomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients were included in this retrospective cohort study. In 14 patients, the subscapularis tendon was vertically incised (group A), whereas in 18 patients, the subscapularis muscle was split longitudinally (group B). Patients were evaluated at 1 year (FU1) and 2 years (FU2) after the Latarjet procedure. Results at follow-up were correlated with patient-specific data and compared with the preoperative status. Primary outcomes were the functional assessment based on Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index and Constant Score (CS) and the assessment of the return to sports activity. Patients' demographics, duration of surgery, and the rate of recurrent dislocations were recorded as secondary variables.

RESULTS

All patients started their sports activities with a mean±SD of 12.41±1.24 weeks. Interestingly, the time from surgery to full recovery of sports activities was significantly longer for group A (mean±SD of 30.17±10.36 weeks) compared to group B (mean±SD of 20.71±3.67 weeks). There is a statistically significant decrease of the WOSI score from the preoperative level compared to FU1 and FU2, indicating a decrease in instability related symptoms during the entire follow up period with no statistically significant difference between group A and B. There is an increase in shoulder function during the entire follow up period based on the CS. Most interestingly, there is a statistically significant difference between group A and B at FU1, indicating a significantly better shoulder function for group B at the early follow up timepoint (FU1). At the later follow up timepoint (FU2), no difference exists in the individual items. However, a significantly better total CS remains in group B, indicating an overall improved function compared to group A.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The longitudinal split of subscapularis muscle is a safe approach which leads to quicker functional recovery and return to sports activity compared to the vertical tenotomy, which is a benefit especially for active individuals. It is therefore recommended as the standard surgical approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Retrospective cohort study.

摘要

简介

Latarjet 手术是治疗慢性肩关节前不稳定的一种有吸引力的手术选择。最初的手术方法包括肩胛下肌腱的垂直切开。或者,肩胛下肌纵向劈开,肌腱附着在小结节上。

假设

假设纵向劈开具有功能优势,与垂直切开相比,可能导致更好的功能结果和更早地恢复体育活动。

材料和方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 32 名患者。在 14 名患者中,肩胛下肌腱被垂直切开(A 组),而在 18 名患者中,肩胛下肌被纵向劈开(B 组)。患者在 Latarjet 手术后 1 年(FU1)和 2 年(FU2)进行评估。随访结果与患者特定数据相关,并与术前状态进行比较。主要结果是基于 Western Ontario Shoulder Instability(WOSI)指数和 Constant 评分(CS)的功能评估以及重返体育活动的评估。记录患者的人口统计学数据、手术持续时间和复发性脱位率作为次要变量。

结果

所有患者开始进行体育活动的平均时间±标准差为 12.41±1.24 周。有趣的是,A 组(平均±标准差为 30.17±10.36 周)从手术到完全恢复体育活动的时间明显长于 B 组(平均±标准差为 20.71±3.67 周)。与 FU1 和 FU2 相比,WOSI 评分从术前水平呈统计学显著下降,表明整个随访期间与不稳定相关的症状减少,但 A 组和 B 组之间无统计学显著差异。CS 显示整个随访期间肩部功能均有增加。最有趣的是,FU1 时 A 组和 B 组之间存在统计学显著差异,表明 B 组在早期随访时间点(FU1)肩部功能明显更好。在较晚的随访时间点(FU2),个体项目之间没有差异。然而,B 组的总 CS 明显更好,表明与 A 组相比,整体功能得到改善。

讨论/结论:与垂直切开相比,肩胛下肌的纵向劈开是一种安全的方法,可导致更快的功能恢复和更早地恢复体育活动,这对于活跃的个体尤其有益。因此,建议将其作为标准手术方法。

证据水平

III;回顾性队列研究。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcome and return to sports activity after surgical treatment for recurrent shoulder instability with a modified Latarjet procedure.改良 Latarjet 术治疗复发性肩关节不稳定的临床疗效及重返运动活动情况。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Sep;107(5):102977. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102977. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
2
Reconstruction of the Coracoacromial Ligament during a Modified Latarjet Procedure for the Treatment of Shoulder Instability: Clinical Outcome at Minimum 5 Years Follow-Up.改良 Latarjet 术治疗肩关节不稳定时喙肩韧带的重建:至少 5 年随访的临床结果。
Z Orthop Unfall. 2022 Feb;160(1):27-34. doi: 10.1055/a-1237-4642. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
3
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport.关节镜下Bankart修复术与开放Bristow-Latarjet手术治疗肩关节不稳的比较:一项聚焦于恢复运动的配对多中心研究
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3198-3205. doi: 10.1177/0363546516658037. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Latarjet procedure using subscapularis split approach offers better rotational endurance than partial tenotomy for anterior shoulder instability.采用肩胛下肌劈开入路的 Latarjet 手术在治疗复发性肩关节前脱位方面比部分切断术具有更好的旋转耐力。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jan;26(1):88-93. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4480-3. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
5
Are Patients Who Undergo the Latarjet Procedure Ready to Return to Play at 6 Months? A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Group Cohort Study.行 Latarjet 手术的患者能否在 6 个月时重返运动?多中心骨科结果网络(MOON)肩部小组队列研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(4):923-930. doi: 10.1177/0363546520901538. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability With Combined Bone Loss: Treatment and Results With the Modified Latarjet Procedure.合并骨质丢失的复发性前肩不稳:改良Latarjet手术的治疗方法及结果
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):922-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546515623929. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
7
Functional outcome and return to sports after the arthroscopic latarjet procedure in young and physically active patients.关节镜下 Latarjet 手术治疗年轻、活跃患者的肩关节功能预后和重返运动情况。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct;140(10):1487-1494. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03513-4. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Similar Results in Return to Sports, Recurrences, and Healing Rates Between the Classic and Congruent-Arc Latarjet for Athletes With Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability and a Failed Stabilization.经典型与弧形吻合型 Latarjet 术治疗复发性肩关节不稳定合并初次稳定失败者的运动恢复、复发和愈合率结果相似
Arthroscopy. 2020 Sep;36(9):2367-2376. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 May 20.
9
Clinical Outcomes Following the Latarjet Procedure in Contact and Collision Athletes.接触性和碰撞性运动员行 Latarjet 手术后的临床疗效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Mar 21;100(6):459-465. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00566.
10
Latarjet procedure versus open capsuloplasty in traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: long-term clinical and functional results.创伤性肩关节前脱位行 Latarjet 手术与切开囊成形术的比较:长期临床和功能结果。
Int Orthop. 2019 Jan;43(1):237-242. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4195-1. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Advances in Orthopedic Surgery for Sports Injuries.运动损伤骨科手术的最新进展
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(2):136-139. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.63412.3060.
2
Open Stabilization Procedures of the Shoulder in the Athlete: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.运动员肩部开放稳定手术:适应症、技术及结果
Open Access J Sports Med. 2021 Nov 2;12:159-169. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S321883. eCollection 2021.