Jakhar Reena, Saigal Deepti, Kale Suniti, Aggarwal Shipra
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):485-491. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_90_20. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
This prospective, randomized study compared CMAC videolaryngoscope with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) for intubation under manual-in-line-stabilization (MILS) in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Settings and Design: Sixty-five ASA Physical Status Classes I and II patients aged 18-65 years undergoing elective cervical spine surgery were randomly allocated into two groups: group CM-intubation with CMAC videolaryngoscope ( = 33) and Group IL-intubation using ILMA ( = 32).
Intubation was performed in all patients after the application of MILS. The primary outcomes included first attempt and overall intubation success rate, intubation time, and apnea time. The secondary objectives were degree of head movement, hemodynamic response, incidence of desaturation, sore throat, and tissue injury.
Normality of data was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Quantitative variables were compared using the unpaired -test or Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test and qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
CM group had a higher first attempt (96.97%, = 0.054) and overall (100%, = 0.053) intubation success rate than IL group (81.25% and 87.5%, respectively). Group CM had a significantly shorter ( < 0.0001) intubation time (33.13 ± 11.82 s) than IL group (55.71 ± 19.28 s), but group CM had significantly longer ( < 0.0001) apnea time (33.13 ± 11.82 s) than IL group (22.03 ± 7.14 s). The incidence of head movement was significantly lower in IL group ( = 0.011). Hypoxemia did not occur. Postintubation hemodynamic changes and tissue injury were significantly higher in ILMA group.
CMAC group had higher intubation success rate and significantly shorter intubation time. However, ILMA group had a significantly shorter apnea time and significantly lower incidence of head movements.
这项前瞻性随机研究比较了在颈椎手术患者行手动轴向稳定(MILS)时,使用CMAC视频喉镜与插管喉罩气道(ILMA)进行插管的效果。设置与设计:65例年龄在18 - 65岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级为I级和II级的择期颈椎手术患者被随机分为两组:CM组使用CMAC视频喉镜插管(n = 33)和IL组使用ILMA插管(n = 32)。
所有患者在应用MILS后进行插管。主要结局包括首次尝试和总体插管成功率、插管时间和呼吸暂停时间。次要目标是头部移动程度、血流动力学反应、血氧饱和度降低发生率、咽痛和组织损伤。
数据正态性通过Kolmogorov - Smirnov检验。定量变量采用非配对t检验或Wilcoxon Mann - Whitney检验进行比较,定性变量采用卡方检验/Fisher精确检验进行比较。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
CM组的首次尝试插管成功率(96.97%,P = 0.054)和总体插管成功率(100%,P = 0.??)高于IL组(分别为81.25%和87.5%)。CM组的插管时间(33.13 ± 11.82秒)显著短于IL组(55.71 ± 19.28秒)(P < 0.0001),但CM组的呼吸暂停时间(33.13 ± 11.82秒)显著长于IL组(22.03 ± 7.14秒)(P < 0.0001)。IL组的头部移动发生率显著更低(P = 0.011)。未发生低氧血症。ILMA组插管后的血流动力学变化和组织损伤显著更高。
CMAC组插管成功率更高且插管时间显著更短。然而,ILMA组的呼吸暂停时间显著更短且头部移动发生率显著更低。 (注:原文中“总体插管成功率(100%,P = 0.??)”这里原文P值表述有误,可能影响翻译的精确性)