Mathew Deepak G, Ramachandran Rashmi, Rewari Vimi, Trikha Anjan
Department of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
J Anesth. 2014 Oct;28(5):655-61. doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1794-x. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the success rate of fiberoptic-guided endotracheal intubation through an Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA), a Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway (Cobra PLA), and a C-Trach Laryngeal Mask Airway (C-Trach) in patients whose necks are stabilized in a hard cervical collar.
One hundred and eighty ASA I-II patients were randomized to undergo endotracheal intubation after general anesthesia via an ILMA (group ILMA), a C-Trach (group C-Trach) or a Cobra PLA (group CPLA) with the application of an appropriately-sized hard cervical collar. A fiberoptic bronchoscope was used for intubation via the ILMA and Cobra PLA. Rate of successful insertion of an endotracheal tube through the three devices was the primary aim. Other parameters compared were time taken for device insertion, endotracheal intubation, hemodynamic changes, incidence of hypoxia, and mucosal injury during the procedure. The incidence of postoperative sore throat was also compared between the three groups.
The success rates of intubation in the ILMA, C-Trach, and CPLA groups were 100, 100, and 98% respectively. The first-attempt success rate was significantly better with the C-Trach compared to Cobra PLA (100 vs. 85%, p < 0.05). The time taken for device insertion was significantly more with the Cobra PLA as compared to that taken with an ILMA or a C-Trach (35.7 vs. 30.3 and 27.5 s, respectively). Intubation through a C-Trach took the least amount of time (84.4 s) as compared to an ILMA (117.9 s) or a Cobra PLA (139.2 s). The incidence of hypoxia and airway morbidity was similar between the groups.
The success rates of fiberoptic-guided endotracheal intubation through an ILMA and a Cobra PLA are similar to the success rate of intubation using a C-Trach in patients whose cervical spines are immobilized with a hard cervical collar.
本研究旨在评估在颈部用硬式颈托固定的患者中,通过插管喉罩气道(ILMA)、眼镜蛇喉周气道(Cobra PLA)和C-Trach喉罩气道(C-Trach)进行纤维支气管镜引导下气管插管的成功率。
180例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I-II级的患者在全身麻醉后随机分组,分别通过ILMA(ILMA组)、C-Trach(C-Trach组)或Cobra PLA(CPLA组)进行气管插管,并佩戴尺寸合适的硬式颈托。通过ILMA和Cobra PLA使用纤维支气管镜进行插管。通过这三种装置成功插入气管导管的比率是主要目标。比较的其他参数包括装置插入时间、气管插管时间、血流动力学变化、缺氧发生率以及操作过程中的黏膜损伤。还比较了三组术后咽痛的发生率。
ILMA组、C-Trach组和CPLA组的插管成功率分别为100%、100%和98%。与Cobra PLA相比,C-Trach的首次尝试成功率显著更高(100%对85%,p<0.05)。与ILMA或C-Trach相比,Cobra PLA的装置插入时间显著更长(分别为35.7秒对30.3秒和27.5秒)。与ILMA(117.9秒)或Cobra PLA(139.2秒)相比,通过C-Trach进行插管所需时间最少(84.4秒)。各组之间缺氧和气道并发症的发生率相似。
在颈椎用硬式颈托固定的患者中,通过ILMA和Cobra PLA进行纤维支气管镜引导下气管插管的成功率与使用C-Trach进行插管的成功率相似。