Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Translational Oncology Section, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Front Immunol. 2021 May 19;12:674658. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.674658. eCollection 2021.
Donor specific antibodies (DSAs) can be responsible for graft failure (GF) in the setting of mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of our study is to report the experience of the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GMTH) in patients with DSAs undergoing haplo-HSCT.
Patients undergoing haplo-HSCT in centers from the GMTH from 2012 to 2020 were included in the study. DSAs were analyzed with a solid-phase single-antigen immunoassay; monitoring was performed during desensitization on days -14, -7, 0 and in a weekly basis until neutrophil engraftment. Desensitization strategies varied depending on center experience, immunofluorescence intensity, complement fixation and type of antibodies.
We identified a total of 20 haplo-HSCT in 19 patients performed with DSAs in 5 centers. 10 (53%) patients presented anti-HLA class I DSAs (6 of them with > 5000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)), 4 (21%) presented anti-HLA class II (1 with > 5000 MFI) and 5 (26%) presented both anti-HLA class I and II (5 with > 5000 MFI). 90% of patients received at least two treatments as desensitization strategy and all experienced a decrease of MFI after desensitization (mean reduction 74%). Only one patient who developed progressive increase of MFI after infusion developed GF. Desensitization treatments used included rituximab, immunoglobulins, therapeutic plasma exchange, incompatible platelets, buffy coat and immunosuppressors. Seventeen (90%) patients achieved neutrophil engraftment; one patient died before engraftment because of infection and one patient with class I DSAs developed primary GF despite an intensive desensitization. After a median follow-up of 10 months, OS and EFS were 60% and 58%, respectively, cumulative incidence of relapse was 5% and NRM was 32%.
Despite the optimal strategy of DSAs desensitization remains unclear, the use of desensitization treatment guided by DSAs intensity kinetics constitute an effective approach with high rates of engraftment for patients with DSAs in need for an haplo-HSCT lacking an alternative suitable donor.
供体特异性抗体(DSA)可导致造血干细胞移植(HSCT)中移植物失功(GF)。本研究旨在报告马德里造血移植组(GMTH)在接受半相合 HSCT 的 DSA 患者中的经验。
纳入 2012 年至 2020 年在 GMTH 中心接受半相合 HSCT 的患者。使用固相单抗原免疫分析法分析 DSA;在脱敏期间于-14、-7、0 天及第 1 周检测 DSA,直至中性粒细胞植入。脱敏策略因中心经验、免疫荧光强度、补体结合和抗体类型而异。
共纳入 5 个中心的 19 例 20 例接受 DSA 的半相合 HSCT 患者。10 例(53%)患者存在抗 HLA Ⅰ类 DSA(其中 6 例 MFI>5000),4 例(21%)存在抗 HLA Ⅱ类 DSA(1 例 MFI>5000),5 例(26%)同时存在抗 HLA Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类 DSA(5 例 MFI>5000)。90%的患者接受了至少两种脱敏治疗,所有患者的 MFI 均在脱敏后下降(平均降低 74%)。仅 1 例输注后 MFI 逐渐升高的患者出现 GF。使用的脱敏治疗包括利妥昔单抗、免疫球蛋白、治疗性血浆置换、不合型血小板、浓缩白细胞和免疫抑制剂。17 例(90%)患者实现中性粒细胞植入;1 例因感染在植入前死亡,1 例抗 HLA Ⅰ类 DSA 患者尽管接受了强化脱敏治疗仍发生原发性 GF。中位随访 10 个月后,OS 和 EFS 分别为 60%和 58%,复发累积发生率为 5%,NRM 为 32%。
尽管 DSA 脱敏的最佳策略仍不明确,但根据 DSA 强度动力学使用脱敏治疗是一种有效的方法,可为需要半相合 HSCT 且无合适替代供体的 DSA 患者提供高植入率。