Baudinet Thomas, Seguy Benjamin, Cetran Laura, Luttoo Muhammad Khaled, Coste Pierre, Gerbaud Edouard
Intensive Cardiology Care Unit and Interventional Cardiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France.
Bordeaux Cardio-Thoracic Research Centre, U1045, Bordeaux University, Hôpital Xavier Arnozan, Pessac, France.
J Cardiol Cases. 2021 Jan 9;23(6):264-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2020.12.014. eCollection 2021 Jun.
A 52-year-old male was referred for an acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Coronary angiography revealed an acute left anterior descending artery occlusion. The patient was treated with a drug-eluting stent (DES). Despite long and repeated high-pressure inflations (>20 atm) of non-compliant balloons, OPN NC high-pressure balloon (SIS Medical AG; Frauenfeld, Switzerland), rotational atherectomy, and cutting balloon, there was a severe hourglass stent underexpansion caused by coronary calcification. Thus, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) (Shockwave Medical, Fremont, CA, USA) was attempted to re-dilate this calcified lesion. Underexpansion was successfully treated after delivering 70 shockwaves to the narrowest segment. IVL delivers localized pulsatile sonic pressure waves inducing circumferential calcium modification and multiple fractures. Our observation illustrates the additional value of coronary lithotripsy as a bail-out procedure to tackle severely calcified, de novo coronary lesions causing stent underexpansion in the context of STEMI, when all other available techniques failed. < Severe coronary calcification may impair device delivery, stent apposition, and inhibit expansion, thus predisposing to stent thrombosis. Intravascular lithotripsy delivers localized pulsatile sonic pressure waves inducing circumferential calcium modification and multiple fractures. Our observation illustrates the additional value of coronary lithotripsy as a bail-out procedure to tackle severely calcified, de novo coronary lesions causing stent underexpansion in the context of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, when all other available techniques failed.>.
一名52岁男性因急性前壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)前来就诊。冠状动脉造影显示左前降支急性闭塞。该患者接受了药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗。尽管使用了非顺应性球囊(OPN NC高压球囊,SIS Medical AG;瑞士弗劳恩费尔德)进行长时间反复高压扩张(>20个大气压)、旋磨术和切割球囊,但由于冠状动脉钙化,仍出现了严重的沙漏样支架扩张不全。因此,尝试采用血管内冲击波碎石术(IVL)(美国加利福尼亚州弗里蒙特市的Shockwave Medical公司)对该钙化病变进行再次扩张。在向最狭窄段施加70次冲击波后,成功治疗了扩张不全。IVL可产生局部脉动性声压波,诱导圆周钙修饰和多处骨折。我们的观察结果表明,在STEMI情况下,当所有其他可用技术均失败时,冠状动脉碎石术作为一种补救措施,对于处理导致支架扩张不全的严重钙化、初发冠状动脉病变具有额外价值。<严重的冠状动脉钙化可能会妨碍器械输送、支架贴壁,并抑制扩张,从而易导致支架血栓形成。血管内冲击波碎石术可产生局部脉动性声压波,诱导圆周钙修饰和多处骨折。我们的观察结果表明,在ST段抬高型心肌梗死情况下,当所有其他可用技术均失败时,冠状动脉碎石术作为一种补救措施,对于处理导致支架扩张不全的严重钙化、初发冠状动脉病变具有额外价值。>